LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ANIL KUMAR JAYSWAL   06 November 2016 at 21:42

Right to information act 2005

RESPECTEBLE SIR,
AFTER HOWMANY DAYS OF FILING/SENDING A RTI APPLICATION WE CAN FILE/SEND FIRST APPEAL TO APPELATE AUTHORITY? CAN WE SEND A FIRST APPEAL OF RTI AFTER THREE MONTHS OR MORE OF IT'S FILING/SENDING DATE?

Suhandh Rengaraj   06 November 2016 at 19:42

Partner retirment

I'M RUNNING A BUSINESS WITH FOUR PARTNERS,NOW THREE OF THEM WANT TO GO OUT FROM THE FIRM.WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THEM. PARTNERSHIP DEED IS NOT REGISTERED IN ANY REGISTERED OFFICE.

Khushal Singh Rawat   06 November 2016 at 18:50

Tax consultants and general insurance agent

Dear Sir,
I want to know as per rule A Tax Consultants can become General Insurance Agent.

Thanks,

Adv.S.A.N.Baroodkar   06 November 2016 at 18:21

Order 9 rule 13 rejected, defendant thereafter filled appeal under order 41 rule 1 along with delay

Dear Sir/Madam,

A Suit was filed, Defendant appeared Filled W.S., Issues Framed thereafter remained absent, the plaintiff and his PW filled Evidence and the Suit was decree, exectuion petition filled.

There after the Defendant filed application U O.9 R.13 to set a site exparte decree, which as rejected.

thereafter 8 months later filed appeal U/s 96 R/W O.41 R.1 along with delay condolence application challenging the original decree as exparte (Delay has be Condone)

please help me with any citation to get the Appeal Dismiss

Divya   06 November 2016 at 18:06

Disposed suit amendment, party amendment

Respected Experts

A money decree suit filed in October 2012 has been disposed exparte in August 2014. The plaintiff claimed ownership of some material in thr suit.

Fact was that some 50% material was in reality owned by another party 'b'. Name of this other party was not mentioned in the suit and the original plaintiff claimed 100% advantage in suit.


Some compromise happened between original plaintiff and other party 'b' where plaintiff said he will give 50% rights in the suit and decree.

1. Can a suit be reopened and plaintiff be increased from one to two under Order 1 rule 10. Sub rule 1.

2. Can amendment be done to put across true facts to the court of the role of other party 'b'.

3. Can the decree in the sole name of original plaintiff be amended to reflect jointly in the name of original plaintiff and other party 'b'.


Thankyou

Pradeep Pundalik Kamath   06 November 2016 at 16:19

Court stay in order to be homeless

I am living in a baithi Chawl for more than 30 years. There are only 4 tenants left in the chawl. Also there is a property of Ground plus 1 which has been demolished by KDMC as it is a old building . The owner is same of both the properties. Now we had filed a case against the owner together along with the above said property tenants. Now owner is telling us that u cannot stay here as this place is not fit to stay. Our Ground plus 1 few tenants have done the settlement with the owner. Few have not done. The building is now demolished so now the owner is saying the 4 left baithi chawl tenants to leave this room and forcefully do the settlement. Also we are saying that when u will redevelop u plz give us a flat. Is it correct. It is an old baithi chawl more than 70 years old. Few people living here are more than 70 years old. Plz guide what shall be done as now inflation is very high to purchase the flat. Also the owner is saying that u take a settlement amount of 2 lacs and leave this room on an immediate basis otherwise court will evict you. We went to the police. That are saying that even though ur matter is in court since it is a baithi chawl nobody can remove as it is not a dangerous property. There are only 8 rooms in chawl. Plz help what solution will u provide in this matter.

Shruti Shruti   06 November 2016 at 15:39

Arrest fear

I have been harassed by my ex lover. WE brokeup mutually. But she want to take revenge on me. hence she gave complaint on me. 2 months of enquiry @ women police station. But since the inspector is not satisfied with her allegations, they said to leave this issue & dont be in touch with each other. AT the last enquiry, I was asked to write a letter stating, I will not disturb her in any mode. I wrote it & left the station. 2 months went & no police called us regding this. I thought its over & I am free. But all of a sudden 2 days back I got a call from same police station asking me to come to station. From the constable there to whom I have gud rapport, I got the information that she has approached court. And Looks like court ordered to file the case.
I was supposed to go to police station yesterday but as adviced by my parents after knowking about this, I absconded to other location. & swtichedd off my mobile number also.
Please guide me what do I need to do?
Is that kind of arrest warrant? If so, what do I need to do?
And If not arrest warrant, Can I fight for that case? I am afraid to show my presence.

Member (Account Deleted)   06 November 2016 at 15:26

Cr.p.c 156(3) was rejected

i gave a petition for directing the police to file fir under 156(3) for 420 case. but it was rejected . I had alrdy visited Local police & commisioner off also. Now after Magistrate rejected by 156(3), what Am i suposed to do now for filing FIR?>

The 420 is on having premarital sex with the consent of marriage. But later cheated.

anuja d g   06 November 2016 at 15:13

how to divide anchestral property

My father(who is no more) has divided his anchestral farm lands to my mother name nearly 55 Years back and to my two brothers 11 years back and some property is still in his name our property is nearly 100 years old ancestral property we are two�brothers and�two sisters we didn't got any thing from the property
Now my mother wants to give half of her property to me how to make that one in my name what is the legal procedure to entitle property share.
Anaa

Anonymous   06 November 2016 at 14:38

Sec 498A

I heard that after 7 yrs of marriage, wife can't file a case of 'dowry', is it correct? Has this got any relation with Sec 498a?