LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Manju   19 November 2016 at 13:32

thumb impression

Hello sir/madam

I'm a boy and my left thumb has been cut and i got stitches ,when I'm 4yrs old . now I'm pursuing M.com ,and the faculty needs my left thumb impression for some registration process . can I give my right thumb impression instead of left ,is there any restrictions .

uday sharma   19 November 2016 at 11:53

Interference in my privacy by neighbors

sir infront of my house a plot which was single story shop is purchased by one of my neighbor. he demolished that old shop and constructed a new three story shop with all
windows and door facing my varanda or open area of my house where we use to sit freely with family. now he has rented that shop to another state laborers
to live there.we are in trouble now. we talked to the owner that it is not house you cant give it on rent for living and requested that please cover balcony of both second and third floor which is facing our varanda or open area to stop direct interference. in reply he said it is my building and i will not change any thing. now it is big trouble for us we cant walk in morning and evening, we cant
sit in sunlight, we cant even sit in open area of house freely , as we always feel someone is watching us. in solution what we can do . if we construct a wall of 60 to 70 feet high, it will sustainble (or last long) what should i do. please help. i have attached file photo for more clarity.

Shiva Shankara R Shetty   19 November 2016 at 11:21

Anecsters property

Dear Experts;

I’m planning to purchase 600 Sq. Ft. out-house property in Jayanagar 4th ‘T’ Block, Bangalore south.

The undivided site is 2400 Sq. Ft allotted by City Improvement Trust Board (later renamed as BDA) in the year of 1958 to the M.R. Ramachandra and issued a possession certificate. Based on such possession certificate, he constructed house measuring 600 Sq. Ft. as out-house.
Ramachandra has two son’s, elder son is M R Prakash and younger son is M R Ramesh. Initially, all are living jointly (Father, mother, elder son, his wife and younger son) in the same house. After getting the marriage of younger son, he decided to construct separate house, in the front portion.

After that, Ramesh constructed new house (1350 Sq. Ft) in front portion and moved there. Father was living along with elder son. A female child born to elder son. Later, male child born to Ramesh.

Immediately, father moved to the younger son house and neglected the elder son.
In 2008, father executed a will. As per the will, the out-house (600 Sq. Ft) given to the elder son and the front house (1,350 Sq. Ft) given to younger son. There is common area which measures 450 Sq. Ft. which belongs to both.

In 2011, M R Ramachandra died and in June, 2014 the absolute sale deed executed between Dy. Secretary, BDA (1st Party) and Mr. Prakash and Mr. Ramesh (both are 2nd party). In July, 2014, the release deed executed by Mr. Prakash and releases 1,350 Sq. Ft. to Mr. Praksh. However, the release deed speaks about the provisions of the will and mentioned the Schedule A (covers the entire property) and Schedule B (covers Ramesh’s share). But, it doesn’t speaks about Prakash’s share. The remaining area is common area and as per the will, it belongs to both and should not construct any structure.

In Aug, 2014 Mr.Prakash also died. Now, Khata of the said 600 Sq. Ft transferred to his wife. Now, she want to sell that property.

Now, my lawyer says that, out-house which measures 600 Sq. Ft is belongs to both the sons and having valid titles based on the absolute sale deed which executed in the year of 2014. As per his view, will is final document for legal heirs (not for buyer) and absolute sale deed is base document for buyer of such property. For buyer, the valid title comes from absolute sale deed only. Because, such sale deed is executed after the execution of will. Therefore, sale deed the latest and final document.

As per the sale deed, the entire property belongs to both. Then, 1,350 Sq. Ft release in July, 2014 from elder brother to younger brother. However, younger brother still having 50% share in out-house.

He was demanding for partition deed between the brothers or consented witness from the younger brother. However, Mr. Prakash not ready for either of partition deed or consented witness.

Now, my advocate refer for second opinion. So, my question is whether my advocate view is correct? Any alternative available? Can I proceed to buy the property?

I attached the soft copy of the release deed for the reference.
Thanks in advance.

Pramilla   19 November 2016 at 11:00

498a

I attended with my son for investigation in the police station in 498a cash, we asked the police to give us a sign on our application that we attend this but he refused and said that this is not necessary, is it right?

Capt ravi Kudari   19 November 2016 at 08:08

Audio tape as evidence

I submitted old tape recording of my wife' s arguments threats done in 1997 and mobile recorded voices of 2 years ago. Have converted both to digital CD.Judge rejected stating tape record is old.I want to counter it.

mayur   19 November 2016 at 05:00

Tenant

hii
im from mumbai im staying in a home with my family we bought this home on mutual understanding that we will pay half amt and emi to the owner but in a week the owner showed up with 20 goons and started throwing our things out so anyhow the society people supported us and the police were called we were saved, this was year 2000 august 2, then he kept coming and be taking the emi but in 2010 feb the person whom we deal with his wife (actual owner) filed an case for rent or vaccant the premises so some lawyer said that you must agree that you were the tenants and he agreed in court that we were the tenants now the court has odered to vaccant the premises and pay the 6 year rent.. the owner had died.. what should i do my family is cheated help..

Shrban   18 November 2016 at 23:19

Car accident

I am residence of sector 39 Noida. 11th Nov I was parked my car in front of my home, in the mid-night another car hit my car from backside and my car get damaged.
G4S security is in place to provide 24x7 security inside the society, the G4S security in charge knows all about the accused car owner but he is not ready to provide any details about the accused.
I talked with Society president and society security in-charge but no one is ready to provide me the details even they have all details about the accused car owner.
I was register a police complain against the case but till now there is no action taken by police.
Today I came to know about the accused car owner’s details from some other sources.
Is there any way to complain against the accused car owner as well as society security in charge and G4S security in charge ?

Shrban   18 November 2016 at 23:10

Car accident

I am residence of sector 39 Noida. 11th Nov I was parked my car in front of my home, in the mid-night another car hit my car from backside and my car get damaged.
G4S security is in place to provide 24x7 security inside the society, the G4S security in charge knows all about the accused car owner but he is not ready to provide any details about the accused.
I talked with Society president and society security in-charge but no one is ready to provide me the details even they have all details about the accused car owner.
I was register a police complain against the case but till now there is no action taken by police.
Today I came to know about the accused car owner’s details from some other sources.
Is there any way to complain against the accused car owner as well as society security in charge and G4S security in charge ?

cddevaraj   18 November 2016 at 22:43

MOU legal validity and registration is required

Sir, what's the legal validity of MOU, registration is required and Stamp duty at Karnataka
DEVARAJ

John P Thomas   18 November 2016 at 22:14

Debt under the debt recovery act

Bank filed a suit against its servant for realization of money for an amount more than ten lakhs, on the allegation that the money due to the bank is the misappropriated amount and the same has been acknowledged by the servant . Whether the suit is maintainable or the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit in the light of the bar under section 18 of the Debt recovery act?