hello respected team lawyersclubindia , a false evidence(Document) has been prepared and produced in court in her dovorce case and 498a case by my bhabhi.
what sort of punishment can she get or not after producing such false evidence in court on oath.
Our lawyer said that under section 340 of crpc, she might be booked, but he never gave us clear picture. plz guide us
Dear Sir
My Father had taken agricultural loan of Rs.20,000/- from Bank of India (Ratnagiri Branch) in the year 2006 but the same is not known / inform to us (family members). In the year 2012 my father is expired. In the year 2014 suddenly the branch manager from above mentioned branch inform me about this loan through my friends in my native place. after few days I visited the branch & had meeting with the branch manager. I asked branch manager to issue notice to me (for loan recovery) or give me in writing the details of loan but he denied for the same. in the last 10 years (from the date of loan taken) we have not received any notice from bank for the recovery of loan/ installment.while discussion branch manager told me that this loan was wrongly treated / accounted in our system & it was not showing in our loan account & during the audit it is come to know. today the branch manager had came to my house & he was insisting my mother to sign some papers. now the bank is insisting to pay Rs. 46000 (20000 principal + 26000 interest)
Please advice on below points
1) How can i make sure that loan was taken by my father
2) how can bank wait till 10 years without recovery of loan
3) how can I check if government had waive off agricultural loan taken from farmers but because of bank mistake this loan was not waive off.
Thanks
ਮੈਂ ਇਕ ਕੇਸ ਧਾਰਾ 138 ਦੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਚੈੱਕ ਬਾਉਂਸ ਹੋਣ ਕਰਕੇ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਿਸ ਵਿਚ ਜੱਜ ਸਾਹਬ ਵੱਲੋ ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਸਾਲ ਦੀ ਸਜਾ ਹੋ ਗਈ। ਜਿਸ ਤੇ ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਨੇ ਮੌਕੇ ਤੇ ਅੰਤਰਿਮ ਜਮਾਨਤ ਕਰਵਾ ਕੇ ਉਪਰਲੀ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਚ ਅਪੀਲ ਦਾਇਰ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਅਤੇ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਹਾਜ਼ਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਇਆ। ਉਪਰਲੀ ਅਦਾਲਤ ਨੇ ਅਪੀਲ ਖਾਰਜ ਕਰਕੇ ਸੀ ਜੇ ਐਮ ਕੋਰਟ ਨੂੰ ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਤੇ ਕਾਰਵਾਈ ਕਰਨ ਦੇ ਆਰਡਰ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤੇ। ਪਰੰਤੂ ਅੱਜ ਇਕ ਸਾਲ ਗੁਜਰ ਚੁੱਕਿਆ ਪੁਲਿਸ ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਨੂੰ ਗਿ੍ਫਤਾਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰ ਰਹੀ ਜਦੋਂ ਕਿ ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਪੁਲੀਸ ਚੋਂ ਰਿਟਾਇਰ ਕਾਂਸਟੇਬਲ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਬਡ਼ੇ ਅਰਾਮ ਨਾਲ ਆਪਣੀ ਪੈਨਸ਼ਨ ਲੈ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ।ਸੀ ਜੇ ਐਮ ਕੋਰਟ ਵਾਰੰਟ ਭੇਜਦੀ ਹੈ ਪਰ ਸਬੰਧਿਤ ਪੁਲਿਸ ਅਫਸਰ ਦਾ ਇਕੋ ਜਵਾਬ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਮਿਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਰਿਹਾ। ਜਦੋਂ ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਮਹਿਕਮੇਂ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਹੀ ਪੈਨਸ਼ਨ ਲੈ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਦਾ ਕੀ ਹੱਲ ਹੈ। ਮੁਜਰਿਮ ਕਿਸ ਤਰਾਂ ਗਿ੍ਫਤਾਰ ਹੋਵੇਗਾ। ਕੀ ਉਸਦੀ ਪੈਨਸ਼ਨ ਬੰਦ ਹੋ ਸਕਦੀ ਹੈ। ਜਾਂ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਪੁਲਿਸ ਅਫਸਰ ਤੇ ਕੋਰਟ ਕੋਈ ਐਕਸ਼ਨ ਲੈ ਸਕਦੀ ਹੈ?
Greetigs Sirs.
CAN 498A CAN BE AGAIN FILED, ONCE THE SAME CASE WAS LOST BY WIFE (DISMISSED BY COURT AFTER PROPER TRIALS).
SAME WIFE SAID IN THE COURT, THAT THE ALLEGATIONS LIKE DOWRY, CRUELTY ETC., ARE FALSE AND CREATED BY HER PARENTS.
AND
AFTER THAT INCIDENT
A CASE WAS BEEN FILED BY THE WIFE ON HER PARENTS FOR MISLEADING HER, TORTURING HER AND FORGING HER SIGNATURE BY HER FATHER.
THE FATHER AND BROTHERS OF THE WIFE WAS BEEN BROUGHT (ARRESTED) TO THE (SAME, WHERE THEY REGISTERED 498A)) POLICE STATION FROM THEIR VILLAGE.
AND THE WIFE'S BROTHER WAS JUST SELECTED FOR SI POST AND WAS IN TRAINING.
NOTE: THIS ARREST ORDERS WHERE GIVEN BY THE SAME COURT. ONCE THEY WHERE SHOWN THEIR PLACE , THE CASE WAS LET GO...
WITH CONDITION THAT THE PARENTS OF THE WIFE SHOULD NOT DISTURB HER OR COME TO HER HOUSE.
NOW AFTER 8 YEARS OF HAPPY MARRIAGE.
THERE WAS A MARRIAGE OF WIFE'S YOUNGER BROTHER. AND WITH THAT THEY AGAIN ENTERED THE HOUSE/ LIFE OF THE WIFE.
PROBLEMS STARTED. SHE LEFT 3 MONTHS BACK FOR DASHSRA FESTIVAL, LEAVING 13 YEARS. KID. WITH ARGUMENT.
NOW I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN OR SHE CAN FILE AGAIN 498A AND DV CASE.
.
RESPECTED LAWYERS,
IN FAMILY COURT COMPROMISE PURSIS FOR MAINTENANCE UNDER SECTION 125 WAS MADE AND SIGNED BY APPELANT AND RESPONDENT ON EACH PAGE AS WELL AS BY ADVOCATES OF BOTH SIDES AT THE END OF PURSIS.ON THE BASIS OF COMPROMISE PURSIS LEARNED JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT DID ORDER FOR MAINTENANCE AFTER EXPLAINING AND READING IN OPEN COURT.BUT AFTER 2 MONTHS APPELANT WENT TO HIGHCOURT AND DID CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION FOR MAINTENANCE .GROUNDS WERE 1) THREE MINOR CHILDREN CHILDREN HAVE NOT SIGNED 2) HER ADVOCATE HAS NOT EXPLAINED PROPERLY.HIGHCOURT ORDERED THAT PURSIS WAS IMPROPER ACCORDING TO CPC ORDER 23(1) AND 32(7) AND SET ASIDE .HIGHCOURT HAS SUGGESTED TRIAL COURT TO DECIDE MAINTENANCE BUT CONTINUE TO GIVE DECIDEC MAINTENANCE AS INTERIM RELIEF TILL FINAL JUDGEMENT OF TRIAL COURT COMES.MY ADVOCATE SAID THAT CIVIL RULE CAN NOT BE APPLICABLE TO FAMILY COURT.SIR WHAT IS YOUR OPINION?WHY SHOULD RESPONDENT SHOULD CONTINUE TO GIVE MAINTENANCE IF PURSIS HAS BEEN QUASHED.GIVE UR SUGGESTION. WHAT SHOULD RESPONDENT SHOULD DO?SHD HE MOVE TO SUPREME COURT?IS IT POSSIBLE TO ADMIT CASE AND TO TAKE STAY AGAINST HIGHCOURT ORDER.KINDLY REPLY.THANKS
RESPECTED SIR
IF SON QUARTERLY SCHOOL FEES IS ABOUT 15320/- IN THIS TOTAL 15320 , TUTION FEES 8520/-, LUNCH FEES 2100/-,OTHER FEE 4700/-. MY QUESTION IS THAT
1)TOTAL FEES IS TO BE CONSIDERED OR ONLY TUTION FEES ? BECAUSE IN INCOME TAX REBATE ONLY TUTION FEE IS CONSIDERED.IF RULE TO CONSIDER ONLY TUTION FEE FOR MAINTENANCE 125,KINDLY GIVE ANY SUPPORT/EVIDENCE/JUDGEMENT TO PRODUCE IN COURT.THANKS
Is the police station remarks, as case not traceable sufficient to right off the fund, for any institute and close the case.
Is the police station remarks, as case not traceable sufficient to right off the fund, for any institute and close the case.
Dear Sir,
This is to inform you that I am the only heir of my parents who were expired. But they both are trusty member of a land which was bought by them and along with other members and after buying the same land a school was built on it which later on was affiliated by the West Bengal Govt.
But due some or the other after running for lot of years the school was closed. Now some builders and local counsellor want to start an English medium school their which I AM SURE THOUGH THEY SAY THAT BUT LATER IT WILL BE CONVERTED TO A OWNERSHIP REALESTATE BUSINESS.
Now my question is that if a school grows OK or I am against the same land to become ownership flat by the real estate businessmen.
So in this status can I be a member of the same trusty? And secondly can I claim my right for the same?
Affidavit sign before SPL exe magistrate in 2004
My wife bro declared thru affidavit that their younger batchllor brother died intestate hence his property,they are only heirs now he sold room and also died then affidavit binding on his heirs to distribute share of room to other heirs.