Gowthamnarahari Reddy
30 December 2016 at 22:48
Dear Members,
I am an advocate recently started practice as an individual after 7 years with a senior
I am defending a case in 498a as an advocate
Only a7 & a8 (brother in law & sister-law) of de facto complainant can be convicted in case without a1 or without a2 – a6
if so any judgments in favour of accused-victims.
I did not face any such situation while practicing with my senior
This question is raised because of some hear say (gossips) by prosecution side
I don’t know why this hear say (gossips) came
Witness evidence is in favour of defendant (accused victim) in case i.e all (4) turned hostile
In this case the de facto complainant is leading a happy married (2nd marriage) life, after getting ex parte divorce from her first husband (accused victim No.1) in above case.
And the issue of de facto complainant 2nd marriage was never brought to the notice of Court/Prosecution
Looking forward, for your advices/suggestions
Ganesh Kumar
30 December 2016 at 22:04
Last Year Delhi High court has delivered a judgement (Judgment delivered on: 03.06.2016 W.P.(C) 2235/2011) in which service tax is excluded from the flat which is booked before the completion of the project or booked at the beginning of the product.
I want whether this judgement will be applicable for all. what need to be done to get the benefit of this judgement.
Ganesh Kumar
30 December 2016 at 21:59
Last Year Delhi High court has delivered a judgement in which service tax is excluded from the flat which is booked before the completion of the project or at the beginning of the product.
shivshanker jain
30 December 2016 at 21:55
a company where i had been invited as a investor , offered me a directorship with a 55% share holding , i was asked to pay twenty lakhs against two lakh share of Rs 10/- each. i paid the money through bank transfer , i got the directorship and registered with ROC.
i got two lakh of shares for which i paid the fee of 600 rs and on a board resolution and form pass 3 had been assured and allotted the shares. after three month i come to know that they are planning to remove me from directorship and they have not allotted me the amount of shares they showed and promised, i came to know that immediately after the allotment they filled a cancellation of allotment without my knowledge
what measures and action can be taken now against the act, please advice?
Mehta
30 December 2016 at 21:23
(i) Sale through POA holder not having any blood relationship is valid and legal ?
(ii) Irrevocable POA is a legal documents ? Registration with Sub-registrar is mandatory, what is stamp duty & registration fee.
(iii) What is the validity period of Irrevocable POA, is it on permanent basis.
(iv) Grantee of POA can be more then one.
(v) POA can be given to other then relative
Shashi Kiran
30 December 2016 at 20:16
Hello
My Uncle had made agreement to buy a property last year and made part of payment by cheque to Mr X.. due to sudden death of my uncle and uncapality of his legal heir the deal could not be completed..
Further the Vendor Mr.X also could not give back the advance payment made to him. Now Mr.Y who we know well is ready to buy the property from Mr.X
But Mr.X is not trust worthy, is there option to take the advance amount my uncle had paid to him from Mr.Y through pay order and balance amont be paid to Mr.X to complete the transaction
Please guide
Thanks
Kiran
PRODYOT ROY
30 December 2016 at 20:04
Validity of notarized document in respect of immovable property is valid surpassing the registered settlement deed,1994?if yes what will be the consequence of registered deed? In a nut shell 1)Validity of notarized document in respect of immovable property 2)Before judgement of Supreme Court in the year 2011 what is the legal validity of deed of settlement executed in the year 1994.If there any scope of forgery for transfer of ownership by the way of notarized document before 2011? Judgement of SC in respect of Suraj mal lamp vs Harian. I am extremely sorry for incomplete quarry. Now plz give your valuable advise
Sammeer A Sange
30 December 2016 at 19:41
Dear Sir,
My father in law's building has been recently been sold to a builder and the builder is now the landlord. There is no society and the monthly rent is paid to the landlord.
He has bought 3 buildings in total next to each other in a row from different landlords similarly.
He wants to redevelop all the 3 buildings together.
All the tenants of the other 2 building have signed the Irrevocable Consent Form (no redevelopment agreement has been made yet) and now he has brought it to our building as our building was just sold last month.
The builder says that
1)Each tenant will get 300+105(fungible FSI)=405sqft in the new premises.
2) He is asking the tenants to sign the Irrevocable Consent Form for redevelopment.
3) He says this is the first step. This will be submitted to MHADA and then the officers from there will come and survey and demarcate the total area of the 3 buildings. Once that is done they will get complete all the legal paperwork required by the official authorities and will also make the Redevelopment Agreement which will specify the rent for alternate accommodation at the prevalent rates and its payment method, the area to given to them etc.
4) He has refused to give parking space individually and said that you can park in the compound which will be provided.
5) Structurally the building is not in a good shape with small rooms.
I request your advice as to should we sign the Irrevocable Consent Form now and is it ok that the Redevelopment agreement is made later or is it important to make the Redevelopment Agreement first.
Majority of the tenants have readily agreed for the redevelopment of the building and trust the builder but are confused as to whether they should sign the consent form now or not?
attached please see the format of consent form given for signature.
Thank you for your kind suggestions.
Anmol tiwari
30 December 2016 at 18:24
Hey I am a student of llb 1st year.. I want to do internship in delhi/ncr region Please suggest where can i register myself as intern plz..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Trademark rights
Dear Sir/Mam,
I have applied for Trademark registration from last 3 years and it's in process. I have been using my brand name from 1981 and I do have proofs of using this brand name from 1981. Now some of my competitors are using my brand name.
So as an applicant do I have rights to stop my competitors from using my brand name or what can be the legal steps to stop them?
Regards,
Sahil Sood