Sashi Kumar
04 March 2017 at 08:30
I am in the process of appointing an Advocate. Please advice.
My Question is:
What clause can I add in the Vakalatnama so I have the right to terminate the Vakalatnama with my advocate without getting his No Objection and appoint another advocate without going through any problem with my current advocate and court process.
moosa
04 March 2017 at 07:25
sir,
The state government owned N B F C violated chitty rules the Inspector general of registration and the taxes department has their support to the company
The government of kerala is not responding for the complaints they simply forward the complaints to the tax department I have no expectation from the state
please let me know who is the central authority up to minister level
Thank you
Ajay Sharma
04 March 2017 at 07:01
Sirs,
I, Dr. Ajay Sharma has been serving at Sankar Foundation, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, an NGO eyecare Hospital since last more than a decade. During the year 2008 the management has constructed their own hospital building and thereupon I was designated as CONSULTANT (Retina) and my salary was paid as detailed below:
SPECIAL PAY: Rs. xxxxxxx
Less: TDS @ 10% xxxxxx
Take Home xxxxxxx
Now, in view of the personal reasons, I planned to relocate to my home town and had submitted my resignation for the existing position. In view of the above, I would request you to clarify as to whether I am eligible for claiming GRATUITY? Subsequently certain others' Payslips bearing in the following manner:
Basic: Rs.xxxxxx
HRA : Rs. xxxx
Special Pay Rs. xxxxx
Allowance Rs.xxxxxx
Less:PF Rs.xxxxxx
TDS Rs.xxxxxx
Take home Rs.xxxxxx
I request the experts to please look into the matter and advice suitably so as to enable me to claim the GRATUITY amount at the earliest.
Best regards,
Dr. Ajay Sharma
Sagar Kabir
03 March 2017 at 23:04
is there any supreme court judgement saying that the right and title of the bonafide purchaser be made valid and protected. please throw light on this aspect with supreme court rulings
Prateek
03 March 2017 at 22:57
Hello all, i am looking to purchase a flat from a lady in Mumbai. Issue is the said flat was registered in 2012 in 'x' surname after couple of years she got divorced and got married due to which her surname has now changed. though she has all the relevant documents with the new surname for proof like aadhar, pan card, name change affidavit and newspaper ad, i am still concerned regarding the whole process and how will be the new agreement for sale will be drafted and all documents required for the same. plz advice
Prateek
03 March 2017 at 22:40
Hello all, i am looking to purchase a flat from a lady in Mumbai. Issue is the said flat was registered in 2012 in 'x' surname after couple of years she got divorced and got married due to which her surname has now changed. though she has all the relevant documents with the new surname for proof like aadhar, pan card, name change affidavit and newspaper ad, i am still concerned regarding the whole process and how will be the new agreement for sale will be drafted and all documents required for the same. plz advice
D.G. Mohan
03 March 2017 at 22:33
In this budget sec 44 AD(2) has been deleted and the consequences of this is illustrated by this example.
Suppose a partnership firm makes turnover of Rs 25 lakhs.
As per sec 44 AD presumptive rate of 8% net profit amounts to Rs2 lakhs.
Upto last year out of Rs 2 lakhs there was provision for deducting partners salary, remuneration and interest in this amount upto a maximum of 90% as per sec44 AD(2).
Hence taxable income was only for 10% of 2 lakhs which amounts to Rs20000.
So Income tax payable was 30% of 20000 which is Rs 6000 only.
But in this budget sec44 AD(2) has been deleted which means salary, remuneration and interest paid to partners would also not be allowed to be claimed as a deduction.
Hence from this year taxable income will be Rs 2 lakhs .
Income tax payable will be 30% of 2 lakhs which will be Rs 60000.
Please observe that income tax paid has increased by 10 times from Rs 6000 to Rs 60000.
Our next alternative is to audit our books of account and lessen our tax burden. But the basic purpose of introducing presumptive taxation scheme as above gets defeated and all small tax payers will be forced to maintain books of accounts and get audited their accounts, which is also costly affair. When an individual gets exemption from IT upto Rs 2.5 lakhs, why a firm has no benefit like them.
Whether my assessment of problem is correct. If correct why no one is worried. Please clarify
Deena
03 March 2017 at 21:28
Hi, In the matter of A.B.A where F.I.R is yet to be filed, I requested the Judge to direct police to give a notice to the applicant, 72 hours prior to filing F.I.R OR arresting him.
In this regard can anyone please provide me citation or landmark judgement which provides for mandatory 72 hours notice to be served to the accused by police before arresting him???
Or citation of cases wherein such an order has been passed under similar circumstances??
pushpakrishna
03 March 2017 at 20:54
dear experts
in a case u/s 138of ni act it is clearly appearing as there is a material alteration regarding the amount.
the complainent made the figure rs.1,00,000 as 7,00,000.
is it necessary to send the same to an expert opinion to prove the same or can we argue the matter on that point to showing the same .
kindly give me a suitable advice on this.
thanq in advance dear experts.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Mp high court gave judgement on false statement
I was an officer in bank. my service matter was filed in CGIT central govt industrial tribunal JABALPUR ,who decided matter in my favour. my employer DENA BANK approached MP HIGH court on the ground of jurisdiction.who settled case agst me.WHOLE case was based on the nature of duties ,performed by me.Vital issue was power of attorney which is issued to every officer. In my case it was NEVER issued to me and i was simply doing clerical work. Bank recorded FALSE statement IN CGIT jabalpur reg this power of attorney and the same was endorsed by HIGH COURT WITHOUT confirming the facts. later on IN RTI response bank stated ==POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT FOUND ON RECORD.
I am jobless since Long 10 years struggling from court to court. HOW THIS INJUSTICE MAY BE RECTIFIED . attaching high court judgement dtd 11.10.2011 plz help me out.