A K Singh
23 March 2017 at 18:36
Case no. W.P (Civil) - 914/2016 has been transferred from Supreme Court to Delhi High Court by an order dated 20/03/2017 for hearing it on merit basis on 10 April 2017.
How i can know status of this case in Delhi High Court Since i tried but i am not able to trace it.
Please guide me on this matter, Thanks in advance.
jayesh kanna
23 March 2017 at 17:23
Hi experts,
Myself & my family that includes my mother, father & brother were booked under section 304B & 498A in Jan 2015. after 2 long years, the trial process finally started this jan'2017. Cross examination of PW1 to PW4 is over during the trial process. There are nearly another 20 witnesses remaining in the trial procedure. During the course of trial of PW1 to PW4, they have given statement in the court mostly which are not in either 161 CRPC or RDO to make the case stronger against us. And they accepted personally in court that they are providing statement not provided either to police or RDO. Here PW1 to PW3 are interested witnesses from deceased family. PW4 is the private evidence. All the 4 witnesses accepted in court that, none of our family visited the deceased or contacted her through mobile for 13 days when the deceased was in her parental home stating her father's illness, which is also the true fact.They have also accepted that there is no written evidence like letter or email from the deceased stating that we harassed her asking dowry.
Finally my query here is, how should we take this as? a progress? positive? or should our advocate be more aggressive? or are we in the right path?
Please advise dear experts
Deepak
23 March 2017 at 16:30
Hello all,
I am planning to buy a residential property(alienated with district commissioner order in 1967) which was originally auctioned as a plot by village panchayat in 1978 and allotted to a person from the same village through a registered sale certificate for auctioned value in 1978. Sale certificate had a condition for not to sale the property for 15 years from the date of sale certificate.
But, the person sold the property to another person in 1979 through registered sale deed(during the period this person has got the Khata in his name) which was again sold to a different person in 1991 through a registered sale deed and which was finally sold to the present owner through a registered sale deed in 1992.
The present owner is having the peaceful possession of the property since 1992 with the Khata being transferred to her name and has built a house in the property after taking panchayath license and building approval plan in 1996.
Encumbrance Certificate also shows there are no pending encumbrances on the property(Although a home loan was taken in 1997 and was cleared in 2016).
Property is in a very good location and hence showing interest on the same.
A nationalised bank has already approved home loan for buying the property.
I dont see any issue except violating the 15 years restriction in the original sale certificate.
Is it safe to buy this property?
Thanks,
Deepak
Mahesh
23 March 2017 at 14:10
Hi,
I have a flat in Thane in Joint name with my father. I lost my father in 2008, post which I updated record with registrar office to remove my fater name and add only my name to property. I did this using release deed(from my mother and sister).
No I want top up on home loan in bank and bank is asking for haiship certificate. Is there any alternative to this. As per my understaindig it takes atleast 7-8 months for haiship certificate. Is there any way I can get done at earliest or any other alternative.
What is the procedure for haiship cerificate.
sailaja
23 March 2017 at 14:03
Hi Team,
Thank you for your support ,I need points on DVC case for MOU what all terms and conditions I can write in MOU on which aspects .
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
sudhakar s. yeradkar
23 March 2017 at 13:56
Respected Experts,
The newly formed Co-Op.Housing Society is conducting society affairs
by the Provisional Committee which is appointed for one year period.
Now they have to issue SHARE CERTIFICATES to the members duly signed by them.
Additionally they have to handover official possession letters & copy of OC obtained from the Builder.
THE ISSUE IS, few members have done illegal construction, encroachment of society spaces, alteration in the flat etc. The Provisional committee has sent official letters to them to demolish/restore the same.
The Committee has decided not to issue SHARE CERTIFICATES or handover them possession letters till they demolish/restore the construction.
I would like to know whether is it correct action of the committee? and what are the implications and consequences.
Thanks in advance.
Yeradkar
Sunil
23 March 2017 at 13:30
Sir,
Can a govt employee do the llb evening course?
Azim A. Charania
23 March 2017 at 11:59
Respected Forum Members
With due respect to you and to your Chair, Need your valuable Views on the above captioned subject matter on my queries listed after brief history of our Factory / Establishment.
We are Private Limited Company having Registered Office at Mumbai Maharashtra, having Pan presence Plant ( Factory) & Office dealing in the business of Oil Blending and refiling of Lubricant Oil and Gas ( LPG ).
In term of Section 2 A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. from our perspective Appropriate Government in our case is Central Government. As we dealing in business which is related to Oil Industries
We have entered in to the Service Agreement with Private Security Agencies for providing security services for our Pan Presence of Factory and Offices which is coming to end by 31st March 2017.
Due to increased in Special Allowance / VDA Notified by State Government / Central Government every Six Month, Private Security Agencies are raising bill demanding difference in DA / Special Allowance.
As per Central Government Notification 2233 Dated 18th September 2008, as per Explanation for the purpose of Notification at Serial number 2 & 4 which read as follow
(2) Where the Existing rates of Wages of any employee based on contract or agreement or otherwise are higher than the rates notified herein, the higher rates shall be protected and treated as minimum wages, applicable for the purpose of this notification to such employee.
(4) The Minimum rates of Wages are applicable to employees employed by Contractors also.
Now the September 2008 Central Notification is superseded by Central Government Notification Dated 19 Jan 2017. number SO 191 E.
As per Explanation for the purpose of Central Notification dated 19 Jan 2017 at (c) & (f) are same as of Serial number 2 & 4 of Central Notification 18th Sep 2008
Further Explanation (j) Central Notification dated 19.01.2017 which read as follow.
Wherein in any area the minimum rates of wages fixed by this notification are lower than the minimum rates of wages fixed by State Government for employees of the aforesaid employment in relation to which the State Government is the Appropriate Government, the rates of wages fixed by the State Government shall in respect of these areas, be deemed to be the minimum wages payable under this notification.
Q Who will be Appropriate Government State Government OR Central Government in our case?
Q Does above Two Notifications are applicable to us as we are Principal Employer & Not the Contractor ?
Q Which Notification we have to follow State Government Notification OR Central Government Notification with regard to Explanation (2) of 2008 notification &(j) of Notification 19.01.2017 attached as above of Central Notification for paying Minimum rates of Wages?
A line in reply is appreciated for such act of kindness I remain indebted to you.
Thanks and regards,
Anonymous
23 March 2017 at 10:24
Respected Experts, I had joined this organisation which is based in New Delhi at their branch in Kolkata in May 2016. They had only given me the offer letter which I duly accepted and had joined but never was provided with an appointment letter and even after requesting many times they did not send the same. The branch was just a godown and all the previous staff had quit but then even I continued and started working. My reporting boss was the CEO of the company based in Delhi. The problem was that the salary credited to us by 20-25 of next month. Which continuously was delayed even after requesting them to pay the salary on time. Later on I got to know this was in practice in the company and even my boss would not listen to me over email, phone or on personal visit and would always reply I will see. Thus not been able to continue with the possibility of delayed salaries I quit in January 2017 on 6 th January. After that I have been requesting them to clear my December month Salary and my travelling and conveyances expenses. But they are avoiding as usual my emails and calls. Please tell me how to recover my dues from them ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
maintenance and alimony
Sir i got divorced on 25 th September 2014 from Gwalior family court on grounds of adultery on my wife's part..it was a one sided decision by the court as my ex wife didn't appear before the court to cross my evidences... Furthershe filed a maintenance case in the month of august 2014(case no-620/2014)which is still in a undecided state as she doesn't appear before the court..as of now its almost 3 yrs.Can u please suggest me how do i get this case dismissed.Further i feel my advocate is fooling me whenever i ask him to process my request for settling down this case.