SHYAMSUNDER BUBNA
22 July 2018 at 19:25
IN ORDER DATED 10TH MARCH 2015 THE HON'BLE COURT DIRECTED THE COURT RECEIVER TO PROCEED WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE THREE CONVEYANCES INCLUDING THE CONVEYANCE OF THE SAID FLAT IN FAVOUR OF THE PLAINTIFF OR HIS NOMINEES ON THE BASIS OF UNDERTAKING TO INDEMNIFY THE COURT RECEIVER IN RELATION TO ANY CLAIMS THAT MAY BE MADE HEREINAFTER AGAINST HIM ON ACCOUNT OF EXECUTION OF TRANSFER DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES IN THIS FASHION, AND THE SAID UNDERTAKING IS ACCEPTED AS AN UNDERTAKING TO THE COURT.
THE NOMINEE OF THE PURCHASER IN FURTHERANCE OF ORDER DATED 10.03.2015 HEREBY UNDERTAKE TO INDEMNIFY THE COURT RECEIVER IN RELATION TO ANY CLAIMS THAT MAY BE AGAINST COURT RECEIVER ON ACCOUNT OF EXECUTION OF TRANSFER DEEDS, FORMS AND CONVEYANCES IN THIS FASHION AND THIS UNDERTAKING IS AN UNDERTAKING TO THE HON'BLE COURT.
An agreement for sale of Flat No. 401/401A along with Stilt Parking in Basement of Benhur Apartment has been executed on 28th August 2017 by you in favor alleged Nominee of Plaintiff/Auction Purchaser M/s. Oomerbhoy Investments Pvt. Ltd. along with confirming parties. This is pertinent to note that Nominee of any party must be individuals and not the Corporate Body. Nominee a person in whose name title to real estate or ownership of stock is held but who is not the actual proprietor or holder.
Ansila
22 July 2018 at 14:57
It has been 14 years,my father died and we are 4 sister's. My mom is not an educated so after my father's death my aunt threatened and the property in her Daughter's name. My mom only signed,two of my sisters were major that time. None of them signed. Is there any possibilities that through the court of law we can get that property back?
Vekatesulu Mandin
22 July 2018 at 13:34
My consumer complaint is listed as call on. and when asked date they gave date in the court. but the date is not mentioned in the CONFONET website.
I enqauired with few advocaets waht is meant by CALL ON.
Call on means no more procedure they told like that.
Usually Consumer complaint steps are:- Notice, objections, written arguments, if IA filed - IA, objections on IA, orders.
In my case the judge has taken the OP replies/objections where he was not supposed to take as I already filed written objections as to how OP can file reply after 3 months of reciept of noitce.
Now judge has kept the case in abeyance. without further procedure.
He said he will finish case in 1-2 dates and he gave looooooooooooong date in 3months gap.
What to be done in this csae. My complaint is not moving at all.
Anonymous
22 July 2018 at 12:04
can i pursue my full time mba degree after joining goverment job.I am in 1 year please let me know the solution
Vaidyanathan
22 July 2018 at 11:13
A member of a co-operative housing society in Mumbai made a will wherein his flat be transferred to 4 named individuals. The administrator (also one of the will holder) applies for probate of will and obtains a letter of administration from high court. The letter administration name the administrator as the legal owner of property. A testament of the will attached to the order mentiones 4 individuals with 25% share each on the flat.
1. I want know whether the society has to transfer the flat and endorse all 4 names of individuals or only the administrator's name to be endorsed on share certificate?
2. After obtaining the letter of administraion one of the will holder dies intestate, and in case the wife of the deceased person claims to transfer the 25% share of the deceased person, (after following procedure as bye law No.35) and makes application to society for admission, whether society to transfer the flat to the spouse of the deceased as nominee or absolute owner of the flat?
We are bit confused and hence this querry. Thanks
Anonymous
22 July 2018 at 10:33
After the charge sheet is filed Does the accused need to continue going to police station to mark the attendance every week like before.
Anonymous
22 July 2018 at 09:30
We represent the co-operative movement in Kerala. Co-operative Societies is facing tough time from the year 2000 onwards due to notices issued by Income tax department under various Sections of Income Tax Act 1961. Conflicting decisions are being made by appellate authorities and even High Court only because the legal experts are not well aware of the factual situation. This has resulted in thousands of litigations causing waste of money, manpower, stationery and valuable time of Courts, ITAT, Income Tax Department and Co-operatives. For example, interpretation of Sections 80P, 56, 68 and 40 a(ia) being made by the Department, ITAT and of course the High Court is different from that of the well settled position of law in other States. There are situations that conflicting decisions are forthcoming from the same authority. As a result, the public exchequer has already lost thousands of Crores of Rupees in these litigations which could have been avoided if the concerned authorities had a clear perspective on the decisions of the Apex Court and various High courts in other States. We hope that CBDT will look into the matter urgently so as to take necessary action in order to prevent unnecessary disputes between Department and Co-operatives on settled position of law.
Now roving enquiries calling for voluminous information from co-operatives are being made by the Department u/s 133(6) for no particular reason taking advantage of the decision of the Apex court in Kathiroor Service Co-operative Bank vs. ITO, Kannur.
We would like to hear the opinion of our experts and request them to suggest a few names of lawyers who would be suitable to handle our cases in High Court and Supreme Court.
Imtiyaz Hussain
21 July 2018 at 22:01
Dear Experts,
There is a case pending before the Hon'ble District court at New Delhi for 4 years and I am on behalf of respondent wife. The petition for declaration of dissolution of marriage under Muslim Law, 1939 has been filed by petitioner husband stating that he has given instant triple talaq in 2014. Now the judgement of Sharya Bano vs. UOI has came last year which held that the instant triple talaq is unconstitutional.
So, my question is can I file an application of dismissal/rejection of petition on the ground that such a petition is voidable on the ground that such practice is held illegal, unconstitutional, and in violation of Articles 14 of Constitution?
Plz revert ASAP. Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Legal actions that can be taken against false 498a case
Hi,
Please can someone guide me as to what actions can a husband and his family can take against a wife who lodged in a fake 498s case and now neither her family nor her lawyer can prove the fake false allegations made against the husband and his family. If she is unable to prove them guilty what punishment is she liable to legally for destroying the mental peace of her husband and his family and harassing them for 9 years.
Can someone guide me.