Srinivas.B.S.S.T
02 April 2009 at 20:21
A is the land owner, he has given GPA to B, B inturn entered into a development agreement with C to construct a multi storied residential apartment complex.
Subsequently C constructed an apartment complex and in the same one unfinished flat was sold to Z. B on behalf of the A as GPA holder and C as a developer executed a register sale deed in favour of Z.
Later the flat was remained unfinished and now Z wants to file a case in consumer forum seeking a direction to finish the balance works of the flat or give money for taking up the finishing works.
Can he file case against A, B & c or C alone is liable?
Member (Account Deleted)
02 April 2009 at 17:28
what is the liability in case of accused issued a Bearer Cheque to the Complainant as an friendly cash?????? will the accused punised under NI Act 1881
himanshu singh
02 April 2009 at 17:26
Dear sir, i have a share trading account in Reliance Money. I am not satisfied with the services of Reliance MOney, they usually deduct the amount from my trading account, when i complain for that they take time to resolved the complain more than one month after making lot of phone calls, i have spend more than Rs500 in making calls & waist my time about 5 hours in conversation with the customer care.
I have faced such type of problem many times, now i am fedup with the services of Reliance MOney i am planning to close the account of Reliance Money, but i want some compensation for the inconveinced caused by the reliance money.
Now i want to know :
1.Can i claim for compensation? if yes for what amount.
2.What is the process for claiming compensation?
Thanking You..
Legal Eagle
02 April 2009 at 17:21
Hi. I have appointed a consultant for doing a particular job (auditing). He charges me his professional fees, alongwith it he also charges me his msc expense incurred in attending to that task. In such a case does service tax be attracted, if so then under which section of the service tax act?
Legal Eagle
02 April 2009 at 17:17
Hi everyone. I am having five to six trust in Bombay duly registered before the Charity Commissioner's office. The object clause of all the Trust deed is the same. Now because of the increase in work, I want to amalgamate all the Trust on the ground that all the Trust deed have a clause that the Trust can donate its corpus or part of it or amalgamate with any other trust having similar objects. Please note that the recital of the deed says that it is an irrevocable trust. I am desperate in amalgamating, as it will be easier for me to handle.
My query, Can I amalgamate, if so then under which section of the Bombay Public Trust Act? Do I have to take prior written permission of the Charity Commissioner or have to inform him about the amalgamation. With this irrevocable clause in it can I still amalgamate, taking permission. Please also let me know the procedure step wise if I can amalgamate?
Awaiting for an early reply,thank you.
neelam desai
02 April 2009 at 16:48
Does a Company (Transferee Co) require to pay stamp Duty on transfer of shares/ Debentures by the Transferor Co upon Demerger (Scheme of Arrangement) ?
Request your views
Regards
Rajesh Semwal
02 April 2009 at 14:05
Respected Members,
PLease tell me about the above term and Section apply on it.
M. PIRAVI PERUMAL
02 April 2009 at 11:59
A & CO. IS MANUFACTURER OF 25 DRUGS/PRODUCTS.
B & CO. WANTS TO PURCHASE 25 DRUGS/PRODUCTS FOR MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING THROUGHOUT INDIA.
I HAVE TO NOW DRAFT AN AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF B & CO.
LEARNED EXPERTS PLEASE ADVISE ME THE VITAL CLAUSES WHICH I HAVE TO INCORPORATE IN THE AGREEMENT.
lakshmi
02 April 2009 at 11:27
What is the meaning of filing a pursis?
The present context relates to a 138 complaint wherein evidence of the complainant has already been recorded but the representative has left the orgn. The court is insisting that not to declare the repr. as hostile witness instead file pursis in the Court i.e. give off evidence.
Hence, clarification is required whether filing of pursis is a correct thing to carry out or not.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
right to liberty
dear sir/madam,
In an Examination hall, flying squad came and took up malpractice check-up, during which the students, of age 16-22 years age, are asked to remove their dresses, in search of chits.In this case, any chits found, they are debarred successive exams and their entire previous exams are cancelled. in this aspect i would like to know and it is necessitated to take an advise:
1. Can a student be punished retrospcetively under malpractice?
2. Can a student be checked, by removing their clothes or touching their personal belongings, under malpractice check ?
3. Is it not the violation of Art 20(1) and 21?
4. Is it not the abuse of the children?
thanks, in advance, for one and all.