Deepa
08 December 2009 at 10:30
A Court decree was obtained 82 years back in connection with my ancestorial property in Kerala,in whch parties are named.Most of the parties are no more now,and many are ladies married 60 to 70 years back.Will the legal heirs of these married ladies will have a right on these ancestorial properties? These properties are in our possession for the past 70 years and land taxes were also paid in our name.We are Malayali brahmins and if a parttion is made now among those who have the possession of the property,will it valid?Is there a court decision by which women married before 1974 are not entitled to have rights in their ancestorial properties?
Anonymous
08 December 2009 at 06:17
a person made an agreement of sale/ irrevocable gpa (with possession) after paying the market value of the property.According to the law it is not a sale deed.
He somehow got his name along with address enclosed in the encumberance certificate. One close look at the EC reveals he as the owner. is it a legally allowed or is it a ploy by him to cheat the prospective buyers.
moreover at the site he has put his name as owner. is it legally correct.
a.manoharan
08 December 2009 at 05:24
Dear friends,
What is Charge Decree for the wife's maintenance over the property of husband . I want a leading Supreme Court Judgement or high courts.
Thanks in advance
Anonymous
08 December 2009 at 01:32
Respected experts,
One of my neighbor while constructing encroached around 400sqft of my land in 1997. We approached the Police but they failed to stop him. So, we prayed for Cr.P.C. 144 at the Hon’ble SDM court, and it invoked. But they didn’t obey the order and continued with the construction. We approached Police again, but police again failed to stop them and only given report u/s 188 Cr.P.C. that opposite party has done construction during the period of section 144 of Cr.P.C. and asked us to file a criminal case. Since my retired father was here that time, he failed/unable to take this pain (he has a fear of court and also prefer losing land than to go to the court). Section 144 Of Cr.P.C. got converted into Section 145 of Cr.P.C and we prayed for the ejection of the encroachment. Suddenly a new development took place which is that the same neighbor lost his entire land in a money suit at Hon’ble Patna High Court to a third party in 1998(case was going on since 1974 between them, where the neighbor had lost everywhere), but the neighbor appealed to Hon’ble Supreme Court. In view of this development our lawyer suggested us to wait for the final judgment between them. His plea was that, if this neighbor loses there also, then he will be out of the scene and our problem will solved and if he wins then we will reopen/restore this case later. We attended till 1999 and after that we stopped putting attendance. The opposite party too stopped attending. So, in 2003 the Hon’ble Magistrate closed the case by writing remark that since no body is taking interest since a long period. Now the neighbor case is undecided and going on, also he creating a lot of nuisance. Now the local lawyers are saying that to file a civil suit for title and recovery of possession otherwise the neighbor will get the advantage of adverse law of possession. Now what should I do? Will the limitation comes in a way for fresh civil (Title) suit or shall we file application to restore the old case? What is the use rather significance of the report u/s 188 Cr.P.C which is in my favor? Also shall I wait for the judgement (between them) of Hon'ble Supreme Court, since if the erring neighbor loses there, my problem will be solved. Pls. advice. Thanks to all.
Regarding the reply I want to say that,
In a plot I have got 0.25 acre and my neighbor owns 0.08 acres. The suit which is pending before hon’ble supreme is not between us, it is between erring neighbor and a third party on different matter (specific performance of contract) since 1974 for the entire land of 0.08. If my neighbor loses there means third party will become my new neighbor, who is not litigant. Other thing is that Patna High Court has not made any order regarding my land or my problem. How come I become party at Supreme Court?
Anonymous
08 December 2009 at 00:06
Hello, I saw one similar question in this community.
Wife is working in some different place. Husband is working in some other place. Wife is not joining husband. Whether husband can file case praying for restitution of conjugal rights?
In such a case whether wife can take shelter of her job? Whether court orders restitution of conjugal rights though she is working?
toufik
07 December 2009 at 23:46
I WANT TO RENT OUT MY FLAT TO SOME STRANGER PERSON PLEASE ADVICE ME WHAT I SHOULD DO?I ASKED ONE OUR LAWYER HE SAID DO NOT MAKE ANY RENT(LEASE)AGREEMENT IS IT CORRECT ADVICE BY HIM? WILL IT NOT RISKY AT THE TIME OF VACANT THE FLAT WITHOUT AGREEMENT?
Anonymous
07 December 2009 at 23:30
WHAT IS THE POPULATION OF INDIA?
WHAT IS THE TOTAL NO. OF PUCCA DWELLING HOUSES IN INDIA?
WHAT IS THE TOTAL CARPET AREA OF THESE HOUSES?
WHAT IS THE TOTAL CARPET AREA UNDER DIRECT POSSESSION OF AN UNION MINISTER?
Anonymous
07 December 2009 at 22:35
hi,
my wife filled false 498a dv attempt to murder three forced abortion etc in police station . but the officer was not convinced with so much lie(or may be i was lucky) so her complaint ended up in B summary report.she went to her parents house i immediately filled for rcr can any body advice me what to do next.i dont want her back in my life
kiran
07 December 2009 at 22:23
Hi All,
The divorce case I filed is in interrogation phase.
I would like to know:
1) Can I submit an object of proof at the time of argument.
2) Can a Divorce be granted by Sessions court ?
3) Will Divorce be granted after deciding on alimony ?
4) Will I be asked to submit IT-Returns before the judge can decide on alimony?
Any suggestions are always invited.
Thanks and Regards,
Kiran.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Accident Claim
SIR/MADAM I WANT TO KNOW THAT IN ACCIDENT CASE WHETHER BIKE (INSURED WITH A INSURANCE COMPANY)HAS STRUCK A PERSON AND HE INJURED THIS ACCIDENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT HE CLAIM AGAINST THAT INSURANCE COMPANY.