Anonymous
14 November 2018 at 00:34
An affidavit of evidence, filed by complainant with in a cheque bouncing complaint was unattested. Summoning of accused was done. Accused appeared and during trial his counsel started cross examining the complainant on said unattested affidavit. During cross examination he putted the question of unattested affidavit. Cross was deferred after some questions.
Is the unattested affidavit in given circumstances admissible in evidence? If not, what is the remedy?
Ranbir
13 November 2018 at 21:56
Dear sir,
What is the procedure to file writ petition in high court at calcutta
Anonymous
13 November 2018 at 21:47
Hello Honorable Experts,
Greetings!
I'm Thirupati from Chennai but I had taken asylum in South Korea from last 1 year because of some reasons and now I'm in India again as my problem got solved but I want to know that can my refugee status of South Korea affect the visa application for any other small or major country?
Anonymous
13 November 2018 at 21:12
section 340 of the crpc is the exception to the general rule
Can perjury be filed in Family court if yes then need relevant para probably from a civil manual
Rahul
13 November 2018 at 16:09
Dear sir,
Where can i get the data with regard to CA firms with LLP status.
Only numbers (zone wise) will do.
Regards
Anonymous
13 November 2018 at 13:04
Dear Sirs/Madam,
Have filled RCR and it was pending in court still since May 2018, in lieu course if i file a Divorce petition, do i need to pay the following below as quoted by opposite side.
1. (15 lakhs - Marriage Expenses)
2. 10000 INR -Monthly maintenance where she earns Rs.65,000 in IT Firm (Pay slip is available)
3. Share in the current residing house - Loan based on myself and the respondent - her claim is since the duration bank has given loan based on her salary and my salary capacity.
Questions
*will she eligible for reimbursement of marriage expenses at current scenario –of RCR Terms
*Will i succeed from paying maintenance since she is a working women
*Will i need to face the trouble of black-mail for share of house since the property is in joint name.
Trusting the experts in Lawyers Club, i bestow upon for a solution which will help in fixing my mind and go for the positive decision
Please help
Thanks
Bhargav
13 November 2018 at 10:59
Sir, please let me know about a declaration deed and its contents
Anonymous
13 November 2018 at 10:59
CASE DETAILS.
Entered into agreement of sale in 1962. Filed specific preformence suit OS NO 389/1969 Entered into fist compormise in 1976 for 21 acers. filed an EP NO 58 OF 1984. In this EP again entered into second compromise on 21-02-1985(Compromise decree) DHR/Plaintiff was allotted 12 acres, and physical possision has been given JDR... and EP is closed.
Filed an application on 30-06-92.(MRO file No.C/7/1992) After compromise decree, DHR/Plaintiff, instead of approaching the executing court (IN THE COMPROMISE DECREE there is specific clause in case the JD fail to execute the sale deed you can execute the sale in the court ), MRO has registration of the sale deed, Basing on the said compromise decree, the MRO after collecting the Stamp duty and registration fee, with the consultation of the concerned Subregistrar and issued a certificate,
25-09-1993 After issuing the above certificate, the petitioners/Defendants have preferred the
present appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Authority claiming that the MRO has not
given any notice before issuing the said certificate and also the MRO has no jurisdiction to entertain
the said case.The RDO opinioned that since it is a decree passed by a civil court and that the MRO
has rightly passed the said order and hence there is no need to middle with the orders of the lower
court and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
04-12-2000 As against the orders of RDO, the Revision Petitioners/Defendants have preferred the
present Revision. After due enquiry, the Joint Collector has dismissed the Revision and confirmed
the orders passed by the below revisional authorities. of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattdar Pass
15-10-2001. As against the said orders of joint Collector, the Revision Petitioners/defendants have
filed a Writ Petition before the High Court. The Hon’ble High Court has confirmed the orders of
below authorities and dismissed the Writ Petition. In its orders, the High Court has disclosed that
the plea of not issuing notice cannot be raised at this point of time and the revisional authorities
have rightly passed the orders as per the Act.
07-02-2005 As against the said order, the Revision Petitioners preferred this Writ Appeal before the
Division Bench. In this, the Division Bench has quashed all the orders passed below authorities and
also set aside the orders of the High Court, Single Judge.
SLP NO. 10907/2005. As against the said orders, the DHR/Plaintiff preferred this SLP and the SLP
is Dismissed on 13/10/2015.
My lawyer filed two petitions EA 744 to open EP 58/84 and EA 745 to execute the sale deed of the second compromise decree for 12 acres In the city civil court where this compromise decree executed. after the supreme court order in 2015.
The judge had dismissed the case on the grounds the petitioner/decree holder is not bonafide in prosecuting the proceeding.
Reasoning of the judge.
The Petitioner/decree holder did not even state as to why he has chosen to go before MRO(mandal revenue officer) though there was a specific clause in the Order/decree "that in case the judgement debtors did not execute the register sale deed in his favour he shell be at liberty to get executed the same through the COURT"
For section 14 limitation act our lawyer marked these judgements
Ghasi Rams case (1998) 6 SCC200
MP Steel corporation vs commissioner of central excise.
judgement debtors
Ketan V. Parekh vs Special Director,Dir.Of ... on 29 November, 2011
MY LAWYER TOLD IN THE ARGUMENTS THAT IN THE MEANTIME THE GOVERNMENT OF AP HAVE AMENDED THE ROR ACT. AND A PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE TO REGULARISE THE UN-REGISTERED SALES U/S 5-A OF THE A.P RIGHTS IN LAND AND PATTEDAR PASSBOOK ACT 1971 AND RULES 1989 SECTION 5-A OF THE ROR ACT PROVIDES REGULARIZATION OF CERTAIN ALIENATIONS OR OTHER TRANSFERS OF LANDS WHICH READS AS FOLLOWS
"NOT WITH STANDING ANY THING CONTAINED IN THE ACT THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT 1882 THE REGISTRATION ACT 1908 OR ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE. WHERE A PERSON IS AN OCCUPANT BY VIRTUE OF AN ALIENATION OR TRANSFER MADE OR EFFECTED OTHER WISE THAN BY REGISTERED DOCUMENT THE ALIENEE OR TRANSFEREE MAY WITHIN SUCH PERIOD AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. APPLY TO MRO FOR A CERTIFICATE DECLARING THAT SUCH ALIENATION OR TRANSFER IS VALID.
q1. whether the good faith /due diligence/bona fide decided on what factors?
q3 My lawyer told me to file revision in the high court
Bhargav
13 November 2018 at 10:57
Sir, what is " declaration document" and what is its content
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Transfer of ownership of unregistered flat
Dear Sir,
1. The property in question is a CGHS flat at Gurgaon and in the name of my brother.
2. Entire purchase price was paid out of the sale proceeds of the flat which was in the name of my mother who has expired two years back.
3. I have paid substantial amount to my brother to clear his dues from private lenders.
4. My brother's share in the property is equal to the money I have paid to him.
5. For the purpose settling the share in the property, my brother has executed a GPA in my name for putting property on rent or sell etc.
My query:
1. Whether on the basis of this GPA I can sell the property?
2. Whether I can receive sale proceeds in my name?
3. Do I have to transfer the property in my name in Registrar Office and HUDA and Society Records?
4. For completing above transfer, is it OK to mention family settlement as reason for such transfer?
Request the learned experts on property matters to clarify.
Regards.