Balaji Bakthavathsal
20 November 2018 at 19:43
Dear Learned Lawyers,
In a false and fictitious civil suit filed by the plaintiff seeking partition of a property on which the plaintiff has no hold at all, the trial court, after the conclusion of the evidences of the suit, the judgment date was marked as 18.07.2018. However, the judgement was not delivered as the plaintiff side wanted to present their side argument which was closed after grating sufficient time (11 adjournements and almost 3 months time). The IA petition was allowed and after that the case was posted for judgment on 26.09.2018 for the second time. And this time, the plaintiff came forward to reopen the case again to present a vexatious document as evidence and it was too allowed. After that process, the suit was announced for judgment for the third time on 30.10.2018 and on that day the judgment was postponed for the reasons that the judgment is not ready and the judge is busy with some other case as per the direction of the Hon’ble High Court. The judgment again postponed to 13.11.2018 for the fourth time stating that the judgment is not ready. Again on 13.11.2018, the judgment was postponed to 19.11.2018 for the fifth time stating that it needed some clarification. On 19.11.2018, again the judgment postponed to 23.11.2018 for the sixth time, this time stating counselling as the reasons which is not clear.
Can you please learned lawyers, elucidate the situation and advice me further course of action to be taken ?
Thanks & Regards
Thirumalai Dasan K
20 November 2018 at 15:02
Dear Sirs/Madame, Due to various issues, I filed a Consumer case in 2016. Sent one Legal Notice requesting documents related to Land, in 2017. Even the MD of the builder met my advocate twice in his law chamber in 2018. I turned down a request on 27.4.2018for a meeting with him slated on 7.5.2018. I have been sending RTI queries, Grievances with CMCELL and PMO. They filed a complaint stating that we are filing all complaints to make money on 1.5.2018 @ Police Station. CSR was closed. They sent me a Defamation notice for 5 Cr dt 18.5.25018 and I replied on 01.6.2018. The PS called for an enquiry against a CMP Petition with magistrate court on the same complaint, under Sec Cr Pc 161 & 91) as if they have to submit my statement by 61.11.2018.I recorded my one page statement with PS on 08.11.2018.Police did not give me a copy of complaint. As on today, 20.11.2018, I have not received any notice from court nor found in a cause list till 30.11.2018. My advocate tries to get the case document from court but it is not found /received. The case number itself not traceable in court. Your advise on this please. Thanking you
Thirumalai Dasan K
20 November 2018 at 13:14
Dear Sirs/Madame, Due to variuos issues, we as a group of owners under a welfare assocaition (registered) staged a oneday fasting protest in July 2015. The association introduced by the builder filed a suit in magistrate court and dismissed in 2018. I filed a Consumer case in 2016. Sent one Legal Notice requesting documents related to Land, in 2017. There were people from Builderside , retired judicial officer spoke to me and my advocate. Even the MD of the builder met my advocate twice in his law chamber in 2018. I turned down a request on 27.4.2018for a meeting with him slated on 7.5.2018. I have been sending RTI queries, Grievances with CMCELL and PMO. They filed a complaint stating that we are filing all complaints to make money on 1.5.2018 @ Police Station. CSR was closed. They sent me a Defamation notice for 5 Cr dt 18.5.25018 and I replied on 01.6.2018. Now an important department ordered (20.9.2018 & 20.10.2018) for reinpsection.Now the Builder Filed a CMP Petition with magistrate court on the same complaint ( Defamation notice). Can he file CMP in (Nov 2018, under Sec CrPc 161 & 91) and I recorded my statement with PS on 08.11.2018 instead of pursuing defamation case, when I replied to his defamation notice wtih all evidences. Thanking you
Anonymous
20 November 2018 at 00:34
Dear sir,
My parents purchased a MIG plot in New Town, Kolkata, governed by New Kolkata Development Authority (NKDA). Later, he constructed a house on the plot. Last year they gifted me the house along with the plot. Now, the mutation of the building has been done with the local authority (NKDA). My question is,
i) Do I need to mutate the land separately with Land Revenue office?
ii) The local authority (NKDA) has only mentioned the details of building in the mutation certificate. The dimensions of the plot area are not mentioned in the mutation certificate. Can it create a problem in future, in case of any dispute?
jains
20 November 2018 at 00:00
A lady born and brought up in Karnataka state. Mother Keralite father Kannadiga. Married to a Karalite boy. Marriage at Kerala. Husband filed divorce petition and obtained expartee divorce order. Questian is, still she could file D.V case, that too in Karnataka. ?
Anonymous
19 November 2018 at 23:23
What is full form of "RTS" (RTS appeal) w r t Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.
Ranbir
19 November 2018 at 22:49
dear sir, a man had one brother and one sister and had purchased a property in the year 1929 though married had no legal heir that in his
property his married sister and brother both reside but after the owners death his brother transfered the property in his name and is trying to oust the sister from the said property does the sister has any legal rights in the said property she is living in that property for
90 years
Baba
19 November 2018 at 22:06
Dear Experts,
I am raising this question with name. Sorry i did not know one should not raise as anonynymous.
This is regarding 30 years old, my father's property.
The property was baught by my father from Mr.X, Mr X baught from Mr.Y.
Title Deed1 has East to West 40,North to south 65 area 6 cents Mr X baught from Mr Y.
Title Deed2 has East to West 45,North to south 60 area 6 cents My father baught from Mr X.
Actually East to west supposed to be 60, North to South 45,area 6 cents.
However bit encroachment happened with slight deviations in all four directions and area is 5.5 cents now.
Now father is no more, we (mother, brother and myself) are legal heirs.
We are planning to sell house. Anyway we are not interested in claiming encroachment we are fine with existing area.
My question is,
1.We should amend the original document (and linked document) for right East to West, North to south measurements (which is swapped in original documents) and right measurements which any way less now due to emcroachment and for existing area and then sell?
If yes, what is the process knowing fact that my father is no more and also Mr.X who sold to my father is old and cant move. Mr.Y is no more as well.
OR
2. Can we directly register to our buyer with all corrections just for existing area without correcting oroginal documents.
Please suggest.
Mudit Shukla
19 November 2018 at 21:05
My client, Rhythm Equity Pvt Ltd, (Investor) is a foreign venture capital fund registered in India. They wish to make an investment by way of a fresh issue of shares into Blues Pvt Ltd, (Company) a company registered in India. Ms Aguilera, (Promoter) of the Company will continue to hold 73% of the shareholding post issue. In the course of their negotiations, the Investor suggests that they insert a clause into the SHA to be able to appoint two out of five directors on the Board. The Promoter notes that the provisions of the Companies Act 2013 provide for the majority shareholder to appoint the Board. The Investor seeks my advice as to whether the SHA can contain a clause for a particular shareholder to appoint directors, even if they are not majority shareholders.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regularization of contract employee.
Govt.regularized some of the contract employees who are recruited under the same advertisement but in different post in the same dept. Can we claimed the same regularization?.Is this the discrimination?. Are these regularized employees similarly situated employee to the irregular employees .