Amarjit
05 August 2019 at 13:05
Dear Sir/Madam
My trade mark name is EUROTOYS.
The Trade Mark application is open to objection on relative grounds of refusal under Section 11 of the Act because the same/similar trade mark(s) is/are already on record of the register for the same or similar goods/services.The detail of same/similar trade marks is
1. EURO and status is Exam Report Issued ( APPLICATION DATE 13/04/1998)
2. EURO and status is Opposed ( APPLICATION DATE 19/02/2003)
What should I do. Both the above mark not register and its pending from long time. Also What is the format of Reply.
Please help.
parvathi reddy
05 August 2019 at 12:56
We found a 900sq feet property for sale. Land Owner says this is ''Hakku Patra'' property more than 15 years old and he purchased it 3 years back from another person and he wants to sell his property now. And this property can be registered as "B Khata".
He said he has all legal documents.
So, can we please know the clauses, rules and regulations before buying it.
Please advise
Nikhil chaudhary
05 August 2019 at 09:38
Hello dear Lawyers,
A civil suit regarding the property title is going on. The case is in the last
stage plaintiff evidence, defendant evidence and additional evidence is
over. Very soon arguments are going to be started.
My Questions are-
1. I came to know about very strong evidence just 2 days back.
I want this evidence to be submitted as evidence in court.
How can I submit this evidence in the court now since the case is in the last stage? Is it too late now?
Please tell me a way.
2. I have a civil case going on in court and all the evidence and cross-examination has been completed in
it. If I run a criminal case now, will this evidence and cross-examination be taken again? Or in criminal case evidence and cross-examination of both parties won't be done because it is already completed in civil case?
Nithin
04 August 2019 at 20:19
Hello sir/madam
I'm working in private organisation and more I have applied for govt exam.
In the notification of exam it is mentioned that you have to get noc from your present employer.
My question is: is noc should be provided by private employees during the time of interview or not..?
Thanks and regards
Nithin
amit
04 August 2019 at 18:45
Manish wants to open a ABC (P) Ltd. Company for running a water filling plant & for this purpose Manish has also taken loan of Rs.75 lacs from two banks. Manish’s very close friend Deepak requested to involve in his aforesaid business i.e. ABC Company.
On 28-02-2007 a company ABC has been registered in which Manish, Akshay & Deepak are the directors as per Memorandum of Association. Deepak had given Rs.5 lacs (3+2) to Manish vide two cheques dated 10-02-2007, in Manish’s previously running firm ‘XYZ Enterprises’ on pretext that ABC Co. Account has not yet been opened so please take this amount for my involvement and my share in the said business.
Manish and Deepak to take water & soda filling of a well known brand had given advance to some person who has franchise of the said product and that person in Delhi assured that he will give permission for the water and soda filling to ABC Co. but for the purpose Manish and Deepak has to pay Rs.10 Lacs to him for giving permission.
Manish and Deepak had given Rs.10 Lacs in cash (since at that time there was no boundation for cash transaction) to that person so that he allow them and give permission for water and soda filling, but the said third person continuing averted (Taalta raha) on one pretext or the other. Thereby cheated both Manish & Deepak.
The days have been passed but the said thirds person in Delhi ran away somewhere and Neither Manish nor Deepak had made complaint to this anywhere.
Now, all of a sudden after 12 years Deepak started blaming Manish that you are responsible for all this & further issued notice U/S 420, 406 IPC through his advocate and demanded to give back his Rs.5 lacs with advocate fees. Also involved Manish’s father too for all this. Since father has nothing to do with all this since he was a Govt. Emplyee in 2007.
To rise cause of action and ground Deepak falsely made statement in legal notice that he had given money as advance to Manish in his XYZ firm for establishment of Manish's ABC (P) Ltd.Company and even after 2-3 years Manish has not refunded his money.
Q1. Is Deepak liable or locus standi to claim his amount from Manish ? Is Manish Responsible for all this?
Q2. After twelve years does a criminal offence U/S 420 and 406 against Manish and his father prevails?
Q3. Deepak being a ABC Co. share holder and one of the Directors can file criminal case against Manish (another Director) and his father after twelve years?
Q4. What remedies can Manish and his father have to get out from this false case being made by Deepak?
Q5. any other remedies?
Venkatesh
04 August 2019 at 14:23
1.What does it mean if case is put under "adjourned admission".
2.What does it mean if case is put under" specially ordered case".
In the cause list of high court
Lawrence William
04 August 2019 at 13:49
Hi friends,
Till September 2009 I was working for a media company and left that company to join another media group for better carrier prospects. In this process the previous company slapped a case on me with grave IPC�s 408, 420,114,120/B, 467, 468, 471 etc. During final charge sheet only 2 IPC�s 408 & 420 were produced before the court. Rest all were removed due to lack to relevant proofs. Now, the case is going on in the court since last 10 years. The complainant had turned up once in court during the trial. I have remained present in court regularly since 2009. Since these are false implications the company is not having proofs to prove me guilty. No one from the Opponants come to the court since last 9 years. Plz advise me on how should I get rid of this endless pain & agony?
krishna
04 August 2019 at 12:33
How to pay nala challan through online?
Is survey number mandatory for payment of nala challan?
Jaydeep singh
04 August 2019 at 09:53
I was warned in first year of my collage.i will face any complications for UPSC selection?do i have to mention it on the attestation form.
I repeat it was" warning "but was a written settlement. Plz help
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Confirmation in PSU on completion of prescribed period
Sir, i joined insurance company (PSU) on 01 feb 19, and as per terms and condition my probation period is 6 month which can be extended as per discretion of management, also if i leave service during probation i am suppose to pay all the salary drawn by me and additional 25000 as cost of training. However if i leave post confirmation, i need to give 1 month notice and in case of breach of this i need to pay 1 month salary. My Divisional manager has sent my CR for confirmation with recommendation to confirm me w.e.f 03 aug 19 instead of 01 aug 19, as i had two days leave without pay. The confirmation CR says if Regional Manager does not agree with the recommendation of Divisional Manager, he should justify his action.
I submitted my resignation on 05 th aug 19 and wanted to leave the service without any notice period, in lieu of this i agreed to pay one month salary. But company is saying you are not confirm because 3 aug was saturday (holiday) and 4 th is sunday (holiday), so your confirmation letter should have been signed on 5th aug and since i have rendered resignation on 5th i cannot be confirmed and i have to pay 7 months salary. Is this justification right. My confirmation is due on 3rd aug.