Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   29 May 2011 at 18:14

help me in this caase please !!!!!!!!!!!!

good evening to all of respected seniours...

Vijay Kumar   28 May 2011 at 22:50

Challanging CAT order

How CAT order can be challanged?
By way of Writ or Appeal?

Abi   28 May 2011 at 21:47

Employer not accepting resignation

Hi,
I am working as Asst. Manager Marketing with a reputed packaging solution company in Pune. Even after 1.2 Yrs of service I am not confirmed with the firm (no reason as such). I have resigned from my position recently but my resignation has not been accepted yet. The only official document I have is the offer letter which doesn’t talk about the notice period etc. Though I have mentioned 2 week notice in my resignation letter. I have a imprest bank account (current account) which is used for everyday branch operations. I am solely responsible for branch operations, sales and finance since there is no one to take care of other responsibilities, however not mentioned in my offer letter. My question is what if the company doesn’t send my replacement till my relieving date as mentioned in my resignation letter? Can I stop reporting to office and close the bank account? Not sure what should be done as far as legal law is concerned. Kindly advice.

Anonymous   28 May 2011 at 10:47

Replacing Competent Authority in a disciplinary proceeding just to follow higher official's wish

Labour Law:
A worker was issued with a chargesheet alleging unauthorised absence for over an year by refusing to join in the transferred place. He denied the charge and in the disciplinary proceedings that ensued thereafter, the Inquiring Authority concluded that the charge was not proved and recommended dropping of the charge. The Competent Authority who ordered the Inquiry, after going the proceedings of the enquiry and the recommendations of the Inquiring Authority wanted to close the issue but his higher office would not permit him to do that. He was asked to issue a letter to the Charged Employee that he (CA) does not accept the findings of the IA and asked the employee to reply to some more points why he should not be punished. The Charged Employee replied the letter of CA and the CA was satisfied that the case needed to be closed. But the higher office still insisted him to issue a letter to the Charged Employee that the charge is proved and the period of alleged absence is treated as 'not spent on duty'. The CA was hesitant but the higher office replaced him with another official as CA just to get the instruction of higher official followed. All these happenings are internal between the authorities but the sufferer is the worker. Can the management replace the CA after all the disciplinary processes are completed except issuance of final orders ? Only to tow the wish of a biased higher official. What is the remedy ?

Anonymous   28 May 2011 at 10:44

Notice Period

A friend of mine is working in a company as HR Officer.She has been working in the company for the past 8 months. As per the Appointment letter she ought to give one month notice in case of giving up the job. There is yet another condition saying the employee has to pay 4 months salary if she wants to be relieved of the job within one year of joining, provided she has been given any training. But no special training was given to her in the last 8 months. Now she has given one month notice as she wants to leave the job. Now the management demands 4 months salary. please advise as to how to deal with this situation.

Ajay Pal Jangra   27 May 2011 at 22:53

Promotion Quota and Direct Quota not decided/ defined.

Subject: Promotion Quota and Direct Quota not decided/ defined.

Sirs.

We are members of Haryana Forest Rangers Welfare Association and we have a query regarding number of posts against Promotion Quota and Direct Quota in cadre of HFS officers. There is a sanctioned post of 54 posts of HFS officers in Haryana Forest Dept.
The cadre was fixed as below by the Financial Commissioner & Principal Sect. to Govt. of Haryana from existing 37 to 54 vide his order dated 11.6.2009. These 54 posts are categorized / classified as –
1. Total No.of Posts for various functions/posts in Haryana Forest Deptt. =44 no.
2. Total No.of Posts for Deputation Reserve (for Haryana Forest Development Corporation and other departments) =7 no.
3. Leave Reserve =3 no.
Total =54 no.

The Ratio in HFS cadre for Promotion Quota & Direct Quota as prescribed in the rule is 67:33 i.e. 67% by promotion and 33% by direct recruitment.

Our queries are as follows:-
1. If department can recruit HFS officers in Direct Quota, against the post of Deputation. (i.e. 7 no. in this case as per order of F.C.& P.S. ).
2. If department can recruit HFS officers in Direct Quota, against the post of Leave reserve(i.e. 3 no. in this case as per order of F.C.& P.S. ).
3. In case posts of Deputation i.e. 7, are abolished due to merger of corporation or otherwise, the directly recruited HFS officers can be removed from service.
4. If these directly recruited officers will not affect the cadre strength in future due to abolition of deputation posts.
5. As number of posts to be filled by Promotion Quota and Direct Quota are not defined in the said order of FC & PS, whether it should be calculated as
(i) 67:33 of 54 i.e. 36 by promotion and 18 by direct recruitment or it should be
(ii) 67:33 of {54- (7 of deputation +3 of leave reserve)} =44 i.e. 29+10=39 by promotion and 15 by direct recruitment.
6. If there is any service rule, guideline or court ruling to decide the cadre strength of promotion quota and direct quota where deputation posts and leave reserve posts are involved. (Quote rules or example if any)
7. The promotion quota and direct recruitment quota should be decided by logic or by the arbitrary or discretionary power of authority where no service rule or court direction is available.

With regards.


ravi juneja   27 May 2011 at 22:05

Fixation of seniority

My department had given the advertisement for recruitment of 90 Engineers in the stream (Electronics-30, Mechanical-30, Electrical-30).

The department had followed the following recruitment procedure:

1. Electronics (30Nos) - Interview in month of june,2007 and joined in service on August,2007.

2. Mechanical (30Nos)- Interview in September,2007 and joined in October,2007.

3. Electrical (30Nos)- Interview in November-2007 and joined in service on December-2007/ January,2008.


Now the department is making seniority on the marks awarded in selection process and make inter see seniority.

My Query:

Can the department make the inter see seniority on the basis of awards of marks in selection process ? by ignoring the length of service and can we prove the selection of mechanical and electrical selection is a subsequent selection.

My Submission :

1. when the electronics engineers had joined the service the fate of Mechanical & Electrical was not there.

2. When Mechanical Engineers joined Electronics Engineers already served in department for two months and even when electrical engineers joined electronics engineers had served six months in job.


Sir,
I need the good judgement on seniority issue where length of service cant be ignored of supreme court of India. My case is going for argument in September and i need the help of esteemed professionals and served the real purpose of the website to get me justice. I am the sufferer of electronics batch whose seniority is affected badly.




Ajay Pal Jangra   27 May 2011 at 20:41

Not getting promotion from the post of Range Officer to HFS officer due to due to pending litigation

Subject : Not getting promotion from the post of Range Officer to HFS officer due to due to pending litigations among senior HFS officers.

Sir
We the members of Haryana Forest Rangers Welfare Association are not getting our promotion to next post of HFS due to various & several litigations pending in Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana. 7 HFS officers are to be promoted to IFS cadre and these vacancies are due for promotion since 1.1.2008 (4 no.) and 1.1.2010 (3no.). These litigations are regarding seniority and confirmation among HFS officer. These litigations are result of over cleverness, selfishness and over ambitions of some of HFS officers. Until and unless these litigations are decided by court, there can be no vacancy for promotion of Range officer to HFS. Court may take another 2-3 years to decide these litigation. The department is not promoting Range Officers to HFS saying that there is no vacancy due to above mentioned reasons. As a result of this the Range Officers are badly affected and service carrier of members of this category is also badly affected. It is causing us harassment, blocking our future prospects and pecuniary losses as well without any fault of ours.
Please guide us-
1.Whom to approach and how we should proceed to get our right of promotion which was due to be provided to us immediately after 1.1.2008 and 1.1.2010.
2. Some posts (may be 6 no.) of HFS officers of Direct Quota are vacant but we are not getting promotion against these posts also. It will take about 3-4 years of time to the department to fill these vacancies due to procedure of recruitment and training. Can we get promotion against these posts as after court decision these vacancies can be adjusted again.
3.Should we suffer without any fault of ours.
4. How we can get justice and our right of promotion.

With regards.

abhay paralikar   27 May 2011 at 16:44

Payment Of Gratuity Act

Is gratuity needs to be paid on the Special Allowance given to employees.

abhay paralikar   27 May 2011 at 16:41

Minimum Wages Act

I am working in a hotel as a Manager Personnel. I understand Rebate is provided in Minimum Wages Act on Food provided to employees. Can i know the full details please