Anonymous
14 June 2011 at 22:09
Q) my query is as under:-
A contract was awarded to a contractor having valid licence for providing services of helpers & drivers through inviting tenders for a period of six months.Then the contract period was further extended for a period of six months on revised rates on mutual concent of both contractor and employer.
Now this period is again going to expire.
Whether the contract period will be further extended on the same rates without inviting the tenders.Is there is any limit for extending the contract period of present contractor in rules for outsoursing of services like drivers and helpers in govt.dept./corporations/boards.
sudarshan jain
14 June 2011 at 16:26
We are a cargo company operating at delhi airport registered with delhi labour department but the central labour department is aksing us to register with them. please help us to know which authority we should be registerd with
N.J. MISHRA
14 June 2011 at 15:06
whether educational institute affiliated to any university is an industry under Industrial Dispuate Act, 1947. if no, kinldy suggest any case law, if yes then under what provision it is an industry.
members please suggest me
C.A Alok Mukherjee
14 June 2011 at 12:59
A corporate had adequately covered by way of insurance of its stock of raw materials from fire theft and riot etc. They are in continuous policy and paying the premium for the risk cover due to above. Recently the company had suffered loss due to destruction of property in the work place due work place violance by it's contract workers. Whether such loss can be claimed from insurance company by considering factory workers as an external factor.
I want expert's to share us some light by providing a case law for this.
PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA
14 June 2011 at 09:02
Dear Sir,
In our company we are getting 40% Hra of Bacic+Special Allowances .But we deduct the HRA in proportionately if any Loss of Pay.Is it justifiable.
Pradeep
Anonymous
13 June 2011 at 12:38
I was Branch Head in a scheduled commercial Bank and was suspended August, 2010 without issuing any explanation/memo. After a lapse of almost ten months no charge sheet has been framed and issued to me till date. Is there any time limit to issue charge sheet after suspending an employee.
As per my knowledge in Government departments if charge sheet is not issued within three to six months of the suspension, suspension is automatically revoked.
If time period is not specifically mentioned in the department's service manual then what is the supreme court ruling.
Is there any supreme court ruling of maximum stipulated time to issue a charge sheet to the employee after suspension.
I AM GETTING SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE AS APPLICABLE IN DEPARTMENT'S SERVICE MANUAL.
It is very much clear in my mind that I have not done anything wrong.
And I exactly want to know supreme court ruling for the maximum time period to issue charge sheet after suspending an employee on the grounds of preliminary investigations as our department's service manual is silent on this subject.
Further, there are instances in our Bank where an employee remained suspended for years together without issuing charge sheet to them.
mir mohamed ismail ali
13 June 2011 at 10:24
SIR,
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THAT THE LABOUR LAW AND EMPLOYMENT RULES ARE SAME FOR CALL CENTER, BPO AND OTHERS IE. LIKE BANKS, INDUSTRIES, FACTORIES, INSURANCE AND OTHER GENERAL AND THEY HAVE RIGHT TO APPROACH TO LABOUR OFFICE OR LABOUR COURT, THE LABOUR LAWS IS SAME FOR ALL OR WHAT PLEASE CONFIRM
ISMAIL ALI
Anonymous
12 June 2011 at 14:36
non-allocation of work
I am working in a AP Govt.Undertaking as an Executive. After promotion as top executive in September 2009, I have been not allotted any work or duties of the post of are also not defined and no such orders are issued. I was kept idle since then. I approached CMD several times with a request for allocation of work. He is saying that he will definitely issue the orders at the earliest and no such orders are issued so far. I am unable to sit whole day without work. It is cause embarrassment and mental agony. Kindly suggest the possible solutions to this problem.
Reply by Expert : palnitkar v v
Normally a person is made to sit idle by way of punishment. But in your case it is strange that you were promoted and still kept without work. This is a kind of punishment. You may move the industrial court or administrative tribunal or the HC as the case may be.
Reply by R.Ramachandran
As rightly pointed out by Mr. Palnitkar the matter appears to be quite strange.
When you say that you were promoted as top executive, what is the designation of that top executive?
Is the said position is a newly created one in the PSU or was existing prior to your promotion?
If it was existing prior to your promotion, then who was occupying that position? Whether that person is still in the PSU or not?
When you say that you made several requests to your CMD, whether such requests were oral or in writing?
If it was only oral, why did you not thought it fit to give a request in writing?
Further information to the above:-
Thanks to Mr.Palnitkar and Mr.Ramachandran for giving their suggestions.
They need some more information for giving categorical reply. Accordingly I am giving the following points:-
1. I have been working in this AP State Govt. PSU since 1984 joined in the feeder cadre of LDC and gradually elevated to the post of DGM (HRD) in the year 2000. In the year 2002 when I processed a file based on the rules, the CMD asked me to change the note as per his taste which is politely rejected by me. Due to this cause gradually some misunderstandings developed between us and some officers played their part for increasing the misunderstandings. The ultimate result is that I was posted from corporate office to the branch office along with post in the year 2002. However no work was allotted to me. In the year 2005 my turn in the seniority has come up for consideration for promotion and accordingly the DPC under the same chairman has recommended my name for promotion to the post of GM(HRD). The existing post of DGM(HRD) in the branch office was diverted to the Corporate Office and one post of GM(HRD) was diverted to the branch office and I was posted in this GM(HRD) post. Again no work allocation was given to me. Once again my turn for promotion to the post of CGM(HRD) has come up for consideration due to the retirement of the existing incumbent and I have been promoted to the post of CGM (HRD in the year 2009. Again the post of GM(HRD) from the branch office is diverted to the corporate office and the existing post of CGM (HRD) from the corporate office is diverted to the branch office and I was posted in this post. Now also no work is allotted i.e., since 2002 (nearly 9 years) in the cadres of DGM, GM and CGM I was made to sit without allotment of any work. There is a left over service of 5 years to me.
In all the three cadres I have submitted written requests for allocation of work but in vain. In the present post of CGM also I made a written representation to the present CMD, who is a gentleman and approached him personally several times. He is very considerate but he is not able to take a decision as the influence of the former CMD (with whom I had a rift) is acting upon him. Both the CMDs are IAS officers. The is the actual position.
As I have been facing this situation since 2002 and bearing humiliation and insult, kindly suggest possible solutions for my problem.
Anonymous
12 June 2011 at 00:02
I am working in a AP Govt.Undertaking as an Executive. After promotion as top executive in September 2009, I have been not allotted any work or duties of the post of are also not defined and no such orders are issued. I was kept idle since then. I approached CMD several times with a request for allocation of work. He is saying that he will definitely issue the orders at the earliest and no such orders are issued so far. I am unable to sit whole day without work. It is cause embarrassment and mental agony. Kindly suggest the possible solutions to this problem.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
important
I was workin in an organisation and had applied for leave...my leave was sanctioned tough. But after the leave i couldnt resume work on the date mentioned due to medical reasons...i had informed the organistaion too. but after few days they refuse to hear any reason and terminate my services for the reason being prolonged absenteeism and also refuse to release my salary for the days i worked stating i was very irregular to work...wherein i had taken leaves for valid reasons during probation. just want to know wether is my termination justified n am i elegible for my salary as well as my relieving letter.? if so what should i do ? helpless.... tried tellin them but they not ready to even speak. please help....
thankyou for the guidance...
tt