anil verma (registeronlyfree)
27 April 2013 at 22:13
SLP PENDING PROCEEDINGS IN LABOUR COURT UNDER SUMMARY TRIAL BY REMAND ORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
In one of my case, the hon'ble High court has remanded one of several issues framed before labour court to be decided afresh upholding rest of the award.
against this remand the employer has filed clarification application before High court which also has been rejected.
the summary trial proceedings are still pending before the labour court and the issue remanded is yet to be decided, the employer has filed SLP before the hon'ble supreme court, facts of which are not known.
are employer justified in filing SLP during pendency of summary trial yet to be concluded.
the high has held 80 % award in my favour. pl suggest me what to do and how to counter the said act of the employer?
Sir all the reply has been received under spam mail, hence no information Pl reply again, it is very important.
kamal kumar
27 April 2013 at 19:06
Hi to All Experts,
Can anybody suggest me regarding time frame for filing the Statutory Complaint in the Army, as far I am concerned that is 60 days from the date of punishment. But some how we delay in filing the complaint, for the same can we go through with the condolence appeal after expiry of the prescribed time frame. And if yes is this in the rules, then please give the reference.
With regards...
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
27 April 2013 at 18:39
SLP PENDING PROCEEDINGS IN LABOUR COURT UNDER SUMMARY TRIAL BY REMAND ORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
In one of my case, the hon'ble High court has remanded one of several issues framed before labour court to be decided afresh upholding rest of the award.
against this remand the employer has filed clarification application before High court which also has been rejected.
the summary trial proceedings are still pending before the labour court and the issue remanded is yet to be decided, the employer has filed SLP before the hon'ble supreme court, facts of which are not known.
are employer justified in filing SLP during pendency of summary trial yet to be concluded.
the high has held 80 % award in my favour. pl suggest me what to do and how to counter the said act of the employer?
ANAND T MALUSARE
27 April 2013 at 14:47
appointment was on deputation for one year by absorption. absorption order was mentioning joining dated. services are transferred without break in service ( leaves, PF etc are transfer to present department).
Department was passed resolution for seniority i.e. for deputationiest joining date is be consider for seniority and Gom resolution was passed and services are considered as "Old Service".
Other 3 persons r on deputation. 2 r retired and parent dept services are considered for promotions and retirement dues. 1 person was promoted on 31.12.03 on senior post.
other all remaining officers / staff are on redeployment basis ( fresh appointment )
The judgment was delivered by Hon. Supreme Court is as……K Madhavan and Anr Vs Union of India and Ors etc., Judgment dated 09/10/1987.
so which will be joining date is consider for seniority.
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
27 April 2013 at 09:07
SLP PENDING PROCEEDINGS IN LABOUR COURT UNDER SUMMARY TRIAL BY REMAND ORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
In one of my case, the hon'ble High court has remanded one of several issues framed before labour court to be decided afresh upholding rest of the award.
against this remand the employer has filed clarification application before High court which also has been rejected.
the summary trial proceedings are still pending before the labour court and the issue remanded is yet to be decided, the employer has filed SLP before the hon'ble supreme court, facts of which are not known.
are employer justified in filing SLP during pendency of summary trial yet to be concluded.
the high has held 80 % award in my favour. pl suggest me what to do and how to counter the said act of the employer?
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
26 April 2013 at 22:59
SLP PENDING PROCEEDINGS IN LABOUR COURT UNDER SUMMARY TRIAL BY REMAND ORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
In one of my case, the hon'ble High court has remanded one of several issues framed before labour court to be decided afresh upholding rest of the award.
against this remand the employer has filed clarification application before High court which also has been rejected.
the summary trial proceedings are still pending before the labour court and the issue remanded is yet to be decided, the employer has filed SLP before the hon'ble supreme court, facts of which are not known.
are employer justified in filing SLP during pendency of summary trial yet to be concluded.
the high has held 80 % award in my favour. pl suggest me what to do and how to counter the said act of the employer?
ANAND T MALUSARE
26 April 2013 at 22:29
My appointment is on deputation for one year. After completion of one year absorption order is issued later by 2 months and made absorbed in the present department ( Maharashtra Government) . My query is about seniority ....
a. which date will be consider for seniority ( joining date in parent department, joining date on deputation, date of completion of deputation period or date of absorption order)
b. services of the parent department is considerable for seniority
c. what are the term for seniority of the deputationiest.
vaibhav jain
26 April 2013 at 21:44
could some body please tell me about no. of national Labour commissions & their recommendations.
In dire need, will be grateful for help
Tricia Thiel
26 April 2013 at 15:05
WOuld someone be able to advise me on the correct procedure that should be followed when someone is not meeting their work performance requirements in a professional service role? Can someone be dismissed for this and what process needs to be followed. Thank you.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Denial of master employee relationship
Respected experts,
What questions can be asked to an employee in cross examination to prove that there was no relationship of master employee. In fact, there was none.
Written statement stands filed questioning the locus standi of the person for filling statement of claim. It is a reference by appropriate government. Kindly advise.