Anonymous
18 April 2011 at 22:20
Sir,
I am medical representative having no mobile phone & my manager wants me to buy it at my expense, as he wants to talk to me any time in a day on official matters,though i am calling him almost everyday or at least alternate day.
I have told him that wherever we go (hospitals & doctors)mobiles are not allowed.
I sending reports & correspondence thru' e.mail. My e.mail id is also there with him. Nothing is that urgent in this profession except his motive of policing.
He keeps disturbing & harassing on mobiles to other collegues of mine, its informed.
He says buy else face consequences.
One collegue of him has committed suicide in his earlier co.(where he worked before) because of harassment on mobile.
Can company make me compulsion like this under any law/legally?
Please guide how to approach?
Its health hazard as our job involves traveling on road.
Anonymous
18 April 2011 at 19:14
does plea bargaining realy helps the accused as well as d court in disposal of a case in d
shortest time or it just allures an accused?
JAYANTA KUMAR DAS
18 April 2011 at 18:17
Query :
I am a Contractual Lecturer in Electrical Engineering at a Diploma Engineering College (State Govt. Institute)under Dept. of Technical Education & Training, West Bengal. The "renewal" of every Contracts of 06 (six) months after an artificial gaps of 02/03/04 days are there. I am there since 11.11.2003 continuously in this way. I am also given the duty of the Head of the Electrical Engineering Department in spite of presence of "regular" Lecturers present in the said department. Can I claim "regularization" of my job ? and how ? I am 01st(first) Class in B.Tech. in Electrical Engineering. This "Post" is Gr.A of State Govt. Service.
Sir/madam, please do answer to my this query.
Anonymous
18 April 2011 at 14:25
Dear Sir,
One Employee of Engg.college has served 8.7 years in the institution,he resigned and now he is claiming for Gratuity,but employer is refusing to release the gratuity amount by stating that you have not served the notice period,when employee joined the organisation,there was no condition about the termination of employment,in the appt.letter nothing has mentioned about the termination of employment (Both Sides),kindly clarify me whether employee has right to claim the Gratuity as per the Payment of Gratuity Act .
Anonymous
17 April 2011 at 18:32
hi, my name is vasanthasekar,
I worked in a small bpo for 8 months for the salary of 4000rs per month but i didn't got my 4months salary, so i quit the job, im asking my salary for the past 4 months after quitting my job but he is not paying my salary, he doesn't have the attitude to pay me, Is there any way to get my salary, but the thing is its not a registered company and they haven't provide me any proof like offer letter or pay slip , so where do i start and how to get my salary.
Anonymous
17 April 2011 at 15:37
Hi ,
my problem was i have been released from company on 26 th of feb,there written that
i have been released from imeadiate effect and collect my release formalities from pune office (As i joined pune office Head office is in Kolkatta)but when i reached to pune office they are not giving me any of letters and my last months salary .
Please guide me ..
Lt COL R S shekhawat
17 April 2011 at 10:53
sir
iam an serving manager in SAIl
MAJOR R S SHEKHAWAT
09449833730
SAIL VISL bhadravathi
as per GOI MOD letter iam eligible for grant of INCREMENT for the commissioned service renderd prior to joining civil-ie SAIL
sir,
iam i legally eligible to get such increment\benefits
please clarify the same from legal angle
the copy of GOI letter is reprodued as under;-
560/43/TA-(a)/03/00/S(GS-1)
Government of India,
Ministry of Defense,
New Delhi, the 7th Jan 1994
To
The Chief Secretary to
All State Governments/Union Territories .
Subject: Concession & Incentives sanctioned by State
Governments to Territorial Army personnel.
Sir,
This refers to Ministry of Defense letter No.47560/GS/TA/-3(a)/306-B/D(GS-VI) dated 19th February 1985 and letter of even number dated 8th September 1992 on the incentives by State Governments to Territorial Army personnel.
2. Most State Governments have instituted some cash awards/grants for the winners of Territorial Army decorations/Medals. However, these awards were instituted a long time back and have been rendered insignificant by inflation. In many States, this reward is limited to Rs.2500/1500 only. It is requested that this may be revised to a minimum of Rs.5000/- for TA decorations and Rs.3000/- for TA medals. Some State Governments have already made the revision.
3 Government of India had also recommended that the facilities listed below may be considered for Territorial Army personnel. These incentives were listed by a committee which was set up to go into the Territorial Army and are already being given by most State Governments :-
(a ) Grant of 01 increment for every 03 years Territorial Army service, as is being given by the Government of Uttar Pradesh.
(b) Counting of Territorial Army embodied service for purposes of seniority, promotion and other considerations to those entering civil services.
(c) Exemption of Road tax on vehicles owned by Territorial Army personnel as is being given by west Bengal Government.
Yours faithfully,
Sd/xxxx-
(S.K. JAIN)
Joint Secretary (G
Ashok. B.V.
16 April 2011 at 16:43
hi
the answer to your query is as follows;
The proviso to section 2(n) is added by amendment Act 20 of 1987. The proviso (ii) states that "in case of a company, any one of the directors, shall be deemed to be the occupier;" Thus in Bharia Metal Containers Pvt. Ltd. V. State of UP 1990 (77) FJR 93, it was held the section 2(n) does not permit a company to nominate anybody else for the purposes of the Act other than one of the Directors of the company"
However, in 1994 II C. L. R. 312, 1992 II CLR 575 stated that any person other than a director can be occupier within the meaning of section 2(n).
Ultimately, the supreme Court in the case of J. K. Industries Ltd. V. Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers reported in 1996 (6) SCC 665
The basic question was whether in the case of a company which owns or runs the factory, is it only a director of the company who can be notified as the occupier of the factory within the meaning of provisio (ii) to section 2 (n) of the Act, or whether the company can nominate any other employee to be the occupier by passing a resolution to the effect that the said employee shall have ultimate control over the affairs of the factory. The Supreme Court approved of the former proposition. Thus as per this judgement no person other than one of the directors can be occupier under the meaning of section 2(n) (ii).
PBS KUMAR
16 April 2011 at 16:01
Dear Experts,
I am in grate confussion. Who is an "OCCUPIER" as per Factories Act, 1947 ? The contravension is only Board of Director nominee has been appointed as Occupier or only any one of the Board of Director has nominated as Occupier ?
Your response is most urgent, if any provide with case law or any G.O. may please supply.
Regards,
PBS KUMAR
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Increments during suspension
I would like to know whether increments falling due during suspension period of an officer of a nationalised bank is payable.Himadri Shekhar Bhattacharjee