Anonymous
21 August 2011 at 19:15
against a labour court award though mentioned as ex-parte (But not ex-parte as the employer has filed w/s, rejoinder, issues framed application but during argument after refusing to file documents case order ex-parte) employer file recall application after 30 days of the publication of award which was duly rejected.
The reference was made in central act, but the application was rejected in state act,as the application before the labour court was presented by authorised representative of the employer on PLAIN PAPER WITHOUT MENTIONING ANY ACT AND WITHOUT AFFIDAVIT,DELAY CONDONE APPLICATION.
Now the award has been challenged before the writ court.
Is this rejection of application in state act will have any serious implication before the writ court as the reference is made in the central act?
how this issue can be effectively dealt before writ court without any adverse affect on the award.?
is the any specific ruling in this matter which may help?
Do suggest with ruling PL.
Anonymous
21 August 2011 at 19:14
against a labour court award though mentioned as ex-parte (But not ex-parte as the employer has filed w/s, rejoinder, issues framed application but during argument after refusing to file documents case order ex-parte) employer file recall application after 30 days of the publication of award which was duly rejected.
The reference was made in central act, but the application was rejected in state act,as the application before the labour court was presented by authorised representative of the employer on PLAIN PAPER WITHOUT MENTIONING ANY ACT AND WITHOUT AFFIDAVIT,DELAY CONDONE APPLICATION.
Now the award has been challenged before the writ court.
Is this rejection of application in state act will have any serious implication before the writ court as the reference is made in the central act?
how this issue can be effectively dealt before writ court without any adverse affect on the award.?
is the any specific ruling in this matter which may help?
Do suggest with ruling PL.
Anonymous
21 August 2011 at 18:21
My relative was dismissed from a Nationalized Bank which reads as under:
DISMISSED WITHOUT NOTICE FROM THE SERVICES OF Nationalised BANK WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT WHICH SHALL ORDINARILY A DISQUALIFICATION FOR FUTURE EMPLOYMENT.
The charges proved are only in respect of procedural irregularities in sanctioning and disbursal of a credit facilities. The charge that lack of integrity and honesty has not been proved.
Does this mean that my relative can be employed in any private sector including a private sector Bank?
Anonymous
21 August 2011 at 10:44
An employee is under probation for 6 months.
He is not cooperative and does not discharge his duties diligently.
Can he be terminated before the probation period without notice?
dinesh narayan
21 August 2011 at 09:31
The contract Labour (regulation and abolition)Act has provision for constitution of state and central labour Advisory board which studies and recommends the abolition of contract labour system.
The state labour advisory board must have conducted a study/and survey,and on the basis of that it would have abolished contract labour system under section 10 of the contract labour regulation act .
0
Anonymous
21 August 2011 at 09:02
I had written examination for departmental examination and didn't get selected. I got the copy of answer sheets through rti act I moved many positions after reevaluation, before the promoted persons and management served the show cause notice to the junior most person. He got the stay for that show cause notice. Then I filed O.A. at CAT. But it was dismissed due to non producing of documents for reevaluation by the management.
can i go to the High court and what is the time limit for appeal. pl guide to me what can i do the further process.
Anonymous
20 August 2011 at 23:16
I an working as a General Manager (HR) in the State PSU. It is a solitary post created in the Headquarters office of the PSU in the year 1990. The PSU is having territorial Zones and under Zones Circles are there. All my predecessors worked as GM(HR) at the Headquarters office of the PSU. I am also working as GM(HR) of the PSU at Headquarters office of the PSU. Now my post is at Headquarters office and orders are issued in writing to me that I should be stationed at Zonal Office, which is away from the Headquarters office and to look after the works at Zonal office. The post from Headquarters is not diverted along with the incumbent. The post is at Headquarters (I am drawing pay and allowances at Headquarters pay drawing unit) and however working at Zonal office. This is done to create humiliation to me as I am not dancing to the tunes of CEO.
My query is a solitary post created at Headquarters office in 1990 for the sole purpose of discharging duties at HQs office and the person presently working in the said post can be asked to be stationed at Zonal office. Is there any way to challenge this as it is causing humiliation to me.
PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA
20 August 2011 at 15:29
Dear sir.
we have received a letter from State Advisory Contract Labour board Regarding Cancellation of Contract system .In our company we are engaging the labour as when required but, due to shortage of Labour in Jamnagar from some time we are engaging them on regular contract basis through a registered Contractor.Regarding wage part we are paying Minimum wage as per govt rule and other benefits like Bonus,leave and canteen facility.Now we do not know why Labour Board is doing this activity. Will you give any guide line in this context.
Pradeep Kumar sharma
shailesh pandey
20 August 2011 at 12:41
kindly assist me to know that while inspection of ESIC the inspector is initiating charges on leave encashment,repair & maintenance, overtime, conveyance , & all other head as he wish. kindly clarify that actual deduction to be made on what head.
regards
shailesh
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Nonpracticingallowence
Hello,
I am in gujarat,here Non Practicing Allowence(NPA)is given to Doctors who are Govt.Employees but nothing to PublicProsecutors. What and how are policies in other states? Shall we file writ in HC?