Anonymous
20 December 2011 at 14:03
Dear Experts,
If the Union made a Settlement with Management
If the Basic + DA determined by both parties are more than minimum wages at the time of Settlement + Other Allowances per month ( Settlement is for 3 years )
But if after 01st year the minimum wages has been revised ( Basic + DA ) but the Settlement wages are less than minimum wages ( Basic + DA ) but including all allowances the Wages per month are more than minimim wages then can union ask for revision of Basic + DA though the wages per month are more than Minimum wages prescribed by the Government?
Karan Gaur
20 December 2011 at 12:31
an employee is paid Rs. 400/- as daily wages for 13 days every month (total 13*400=5200).
Whether he could be an excluded employee because if we calculate his wages in monthly terms that comes to Rs. 10400 (26 days*400)
Anonymous
20 December 2011 at 11:18
i would be grateful , if someone can clarify
the difference among absorption, deputation and direct recruitment? what would be their advantages and disadvantages for an new inductee?
Anonymous
20 December 2011 at 11:16
When the disciplinary proceedings are treated to commence?
When the chargesgeet /charge memo is issued or when the approval from the competent authority is given?
amir haider
20 December 2011 at 10:38
Hello,
when one applies 'through proper channel' from one govt deptt(parent deptt) to another govt deptt (new deptt) and
later joins it, thereby he retains a lien in the parent govt deptt for two years.
during these two years he remains at the strength ( on the roll) of 02 govt deptts. WOULD IT NOT TANTAMOUNT TO 'DOUBLE SERVICE' and an ILLEGALITY or otherwise?
Please explain as the matter is disturbing for long.
regards
Akash
Pappu Yadav
19 December 2011 at 21:22
Dear Sir,
I joined a pharma company as a manager in june 2011 and without any reason i was asked to resign on 22nd Aug 2011.i have actually worked in company from 1st aug. to 22nd aug. 2011.i got salary of only june and july month.Company has not released any salary and expenses on time. company has given expense of june month on 30 th Aug after leaving company.my boss sent a mail to resign then i resigned and hand over all company property to my boss but still i am waiting for my salary of Aug month. and company has not given expenses of july and aug month also. now i have done all the formalties. i spoke to HR and MD also but inspite of sending many reminder Emails and subsequent calls still they are not releasing my salary and other dues. I was employed in mumbai but company is in chennai. they dont have any office in mumbai. during my tenure in company my bosses harrassed me unneccessarily without any reason. my bosses always shouted on me.i cant tell you in words.then i complained to company about my bosses .i think this may be one reason for not realing my salary.i have sent many mails but they are not replying and sometimes they are not picking my phone calls also. now i am very desperate for my money.pls guide me after almost 4 months what legal action can i take to get my salary and other dues? can i lodge police complaint against my bosses for harrassement. actually i want to teach them a lesson so that this should not be repeated with anyone
Anonymous
19 December 2011 at 20:24
if the reference(industrial Dispute) is individual one and award are passed individual in more than 15 matter then whether one restoration application is maintainable in 15 awards ? i am of the opinion that no but in need of citation. any one can help me its urgent
Anonymous
19 December 2011 at 20:22
if the reference are individual one and award are individual then whether one restoration application is maintanable? i am of the opinion that no but in need of citation. any one can help me its urgent
Nariman Bhote
19 December 2011 at 18:38
Sir,
My younger brother died on 28th Feb 2011, at Coimbatore. He was a Doctor with KG Hospital, at Coimbatore for the past 23 years, being head of the blood transfussion dept and died due to ill health and organ failure, while on duty.
He had nominated me in his Providend Fund A/C, to receive all moneys due, in event of his death.
The hospital forwarded all the relevant papers to the PF dept, in Coimbatore, to help me claim the amount due and I also submitted my details, including proof of my identity/residence, etc. I live in Mumbai. Both my parents are dead long ago (mother in 1982 & father in 1984). I have one sister (elder to me, living with her husband & family in Mumbai). My brother who expired, was a bachelor all his life and had never married or had any other dependants or children whatsoever, and no property in his name, or anything. He died at age 54.
The PF dept has not yet (its over 9 months now) settled my claim. They have returned the papers to the hospital (his employer), stating they require a legal heir certificate. I had also provided a copy of the legal heir certificate (which in 1984 I obtained from Coimbatore Tasildar's Office, after my parents died), stating that only us 3 children, were the legal heirs. In spite of this they now want and insist on a legal heir certificate to be obtained for my brother.
I do not understand the logic -- when a person has specifically nominated someone to receive the share/amounts due in a particular case, why they insist on a legal heir certificate now? What is the purpose of nomination, (if this be the case), be it in any matter? As far as I understand, you can nominate any person (not just a blood relation) to receive your largesse...be it your bank balance, fixed deposits, property or any any matter...
I request you to please help and advise, what I should do in this matter? Is it necessary, in the 1st place to produce a legal heir/succession certificate, when you are already named the nominee ?
If so, then how do I go about obtaining this certificate. As I mentioned earlier, I live in Mumbai and ther is no one now in Coimbatore. Pls advise and help. Many thanks,
Nariman Bhote
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Gratuity and other fund
dear experts plz advise me on the service law there is an advocate in delhi who works for MCD(MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI) WORKERS who got retired or expired on job.
according to him after getting the benefits after retirement/death there also remains some money with the department and he files the petition or application and get the further amt to the employee I m totally confused under which law he gets the amt.
plz help me in this matter.