Master the Science Behind Firearm Evidence. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   11 February 2010 at 13:07

regarding case booked under 306

its the case filed on y aunt &Uncle as their neighbour(A lady)committed suicide. actually there is small dispute between two familes and 2 days before also it was.
now the case filed by her husband on all my uncles family(even children $girls &1 boy) that because of the dispute she has died.
now they are in remand & we applied bail but judge didnt sanction. Now the family is in deep trouble, how to save them?

Anonymous   11 February 2010 at 11:57

Tranfer of property


Dear Sir,
Under the SRA schme our property has been transfered my mother which was in the name of my father who had been expired.And my mother want to that this property transfered in the my name instead of sharing with my step-brother.
So we can do this according to power of attorny?

Pawan Patil   11 February 2010 at 10:25

Will of Property


Sir/ Madam,

I want know if I made Will before my death. In that Will I mention I will give my property to one son instead of two sons?

Is it legal?

Is it Will should registered or on stamp Paper?

I am awaiting your valuable reply


Regards, Pawan




Anonymous   10 February 2010 at 20:46

daughter right

one person have two sons and one daughter he has 4acres of agricultural land acquired from his father and he has another 6acres his own property. his childrens became major daughter get married my question is whether daughter has any right to share that property respectively 4&6 acres.she can claim on that property

preeti   10 February 2010 at 18:54

Plz help

My friends husband and inlaws demanded Dowry from her and her family. they were together for 13 months and when she was unable to bring in the dowry, her husband left her at her parental house. he was untraceable for 2 months and after much efforts from my friends parents they came for a meeting wherein her husband refused to live with her without money. after 1 month he filed a section 9 against her. it will be 2 years for this case in this july. after repeated failed attempts for reunion she filed a 498 against them. trial of it still not started. its now been two year tht they r living seperatly.
ection 9 case is still in court. no RCR has been ordered by court. one reply was filed by my frnd 1.5 years back sayin tht since inlaws demanded money and her husband himself left her at her parental home she is unable to join the company out of fear of her life. court has issued some concerns to her huband and asked him to file a reply which he didn't for the last 8 months.
Now she want to file any such reply which can save her from her huband forming ground for divorce.

My question is tht if husband can file for divorce on any grounds? wht r the loopholes in section 9 against girl in this case. she still want a reconciliation provided they will not demand any dowry. Plz help on this urgently.

umakant   10 February 2010 at 17:33

marriage

Ravikumar is working in a corporste sector. he has developed intimacy with his colleage-co-worker RANI.They were living togetherfor about 5 years without binding themselves in any marital tie,Ultimately Rani delivered a child .later on, ravikumar has developed intimacy with another lady and decided to perform marriage with her .On this issuue there was a strained relation between Ravikumar and Rani.rani seeks legal remidies , including injunction order preventing him from performing marriage with another lady suggest remidies for rani

Anonymous   10 February 2010 at 17:01

KIND ATTENTION

Dear friends

As my client's father has disowned my client which is having matrimonial litigations.
My query is this whether he can reside with his father in his father's house.

if yes then why?
if no then why ?

Yogesha   10 February 2010 at 17:00

Panchayath Parikath

Hi,
There was a Panchayth Parikath(Land Partition) made 15 years ago in front of leaders of the village. The Land Belong to A(Father) and B(Mother) and D(Second Son) was divided for three sons C, D and E.All are agreed and signed to the paper except B(Mother). Is it a valid Parikath now.Son E is Fighting to get the land according to the Parikath but C and D are opposite to it.Is it possible for E to win the case through the court.Can son D(Second son) enjoys his own property regardless of the Parikath which was made 15 years ago.One more thing is B(Mother) is passed away.she is no more.Please reply.

Aruna   10 February 2010 at 13:26

Comment on Bail

1.Does Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 , Section 125 is bailable?

2.What is the maximum penalty and maximum how many times Bail can be granted?

3.If the Husband is habitual defaulter maximum how many times a warrant can be issued?

Mohamed Ali   10 February 2010 at 11:11

Remedy

This question is repeatedly filed not to disturb members, the idea is to get osulutely right View. As the matter is little bit complicated..

Sir,In this Sunni Muslim partition suit, The decree dated 1960 is a preliminary decree,In that preliminary decree our grandmother was 3rd plaintiff and her share is declared as 1/17th share in all the suit schedule properties,

Final decree proceedings was filed in 1986 and is still pending,

She has 3 children One predeceased son with 3 childrens, and 2 daughters who survive her.

As some of the legal heirs(children of predeceased son) of 3rd plaintiff were brought on record in the Final decree petition as LR's of 3rd plaintiff by mistake for which the other legal heirs did not object at that time in 1986, even though they are not entitle for any share as per Mohameddan law.

The final decree proceedings court is not ready to decide Interse dispute among one 3rd plaintiff's Legal heirs to decide who are the legal heirs who are entitle for share in 3rd plaintiff's share, The court says it is out of scope of final decree court to decided who are the legal heirs who are entitle for share in the 3rd plaintiff’s 1/17th share.

As we have (daughters)already filed a application in the pending FDP to delete these LR’s but our I.A is dismissed .

We have collection of very good citations(ILR 2004 KAR 3599, Air 1982 Patna 89,Moolla CAssim 33, Cal 173 at page 178, 1992(3), KAR L.J.666(DB) etc on Mohameddan law ,which clearly shows that the predeceased son’s children are not entitle for any share..

what is the right remedy for us in pending final decree proceeding?

1)Can we go for a negative prayer through new Interlocutary application in the pending FDP saying the childrens of predeceased son are not legal heirs of 3rd plaintiff as per Mohameddan law, The court has to decide who are the legal heirs of 3rd plaintiff as sated in CPC Order 22 rule 5.

Or


2) Can a seperate Orignaluit be filed to declare who are the correct legal heirs as per Mohameddan law to succeed in the 1/17 th share of 3rd plaintiff, as FDP court is not ready to decide \ Interse matters between legal heirs of plaintiff.

3) Will Sperate suit will not be a resjudica as final decree is still pending


4) Can a declaratory suit with out court fees be filed just to declare who are the legal heirs of 3rd plaintiff?