Anonymous
26 June 2022 at 18:48
I was live-in relationship with a lady. During our relationship I have entrusted 200 gram gold in good faith.
Now she leave me & married again & hide herself. Her mother give written statement that the lady has taken 200 gram gold ornaments from me. She refused to return my gold. I am filing 156(3) CRPC for lodge FIR u/s 420 IPC & 406 IPC.
Will police arrest the lady ?
Could I get my gold back ?
govardhan varma
25 June 2022 at 23:05
What is the Section of the return of the Documents in the CrpC?
Anonymous
25 June 2022 at 21:42
Agar kisi par ipc sec 323, 504,506 me case ho to usme kitni saza ho sakti h or kya ye bail mil sakti ya nhi...isse kese defence kiya ja sakta h?please reply i am very scared.
Anonymous
25 June 2022 at 18:40
498A IPC is filed by my daughter in law against me. I have no relationship with my daughter in law since last 8 years.
In Chargesheet there is no allegation against me but I am accused. No witness stated anything against me.Trial is not started. My daughter in law is residing at distance place. I am a senior citizen.
Can I file a counter case in my local court ?
Will court punish her and under what section ?
Anonymous
24 June 2022 at 23:23
Sir,
I have lodge FIR against XXX to whom I have entrusted to keep my gold ornaments.
She had kept my gold article in her house & some of the gold has been given to her daughter.
To quit refund of my gold article she intentionally lodge a FIR for theft against her daughter & send her daughter to unknown place.
Neither she nor her daughter are ready to refund.
Police did not take any step but ask money from me.
Can I approach court & state that police did nothing & asking money from me ?
Madhu Mittal
20 June 2022 at 21:06
A Loan is given to a Proprietorship Firm on the basis of post dated cheque of Proprietorship Firm duly signed by its Proprietor and A Promissory note signed by his son as Authorised Representative of Proprietorship Firm. When cheque presented, it was dishonored due to Insufficient Fund . Legal notice was got issued to 1. Proprietorship Firm 2. Proprietor 3. Authorised Representative. No reply from anyone of three.Case u/s 138 was lodged and Cognizance was taken against all three, Proprietor and Authorised Representative got bail. Substance of accusation was stated u/s 251.Now An application for discharge without mentioning Section in trial court has been put by Authorised Representative taking pleas that there is no relation of his with Proprietorship Firm and he was falsely implicated. Now there is A Supreme Court three bench decision Named Adalat Prasad V Rooplal Jindal in which it was stated that now remedy for accused is only u/s 482, Trial Court can not review its decision.Now there is a Supreme Court Decision Named Raghu Lakshminarayan Vs. Fine Tubes Decided On: 05.04.2007 according to which Proprietor Concern is not a Company u/s 141 N I Act, so its employee can not be implicated as accused. The reasoning for this decision not 100 per cent correct, according to someone’s view and mostly based on civil law which is also not correctly interpretated.
Now u/s 141 N I Act , Company means ……….includes a firm or …..
Here as per someone’s interpretation, a Firm is written, not Partnership Firm. So there a strong pleas that ‘a firm” includes not only both Partnership Firm Registered and Unregistered, but Proprietorship Firm also. Reliance is placed on following namely :
1. HIGH COURT OF MADRAS ,Swathi Creations Vs. Sivanandham Agencies, Decided On: 17.12.2004 MANU/TN/1575/2004 2. HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Y. Venkata Reddy Vs. Jagadamba Enterprises and Anr. Decided On: 03.01.2002 MANU/AP/0893/2002
2. at : https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/firm-definition-meaning/ A firm is a commercial enterprise…sole proprietorship, ..
3. Payee Proprietorship can lodged case u/s 138 (SC decision in Shankar Finance and Investments Decided on 26.06.2008) whie in Civil suit not in Payee name
4. It is settled law that statutory provisions shall have precedents over the judicial pronouncements
Now Guidelines is sought on following points:
1. Whether SC decision Adalat Prasad V Rooplal Jindal is sufficient to get application of Authorised Person dismissed at Trial Court ?
2. What is the correct law whether Proprietorship Firm is a company or not u/s 141 N I Act ?
3. If Proprietorship Firm is a company u/s 141 N I Act, how to deal with SC Decision Raghu Lakshminarayan Vs. Fine Tubes a) at trial Court 2) at High Court u/s 482 3) Whether can be called decision per in curiam on the basis of above
4. Anything else, by which Proprietorship Firm can be recognized a company u/s 141 N I Act
5. Any other guidelines, so that application of Authorised Representative can be dismissed not only at Trial Court level, if necessity arises u/s 482 also.
Member (Account Deleted)
20 June 2022 at 11:08
Hello.im a bachelor.i have physical relationship with a married woman.That woman secretly captured our intimate videos and now blacmailing me for money.what can i do?
Anonymous
18 June 2022 at 21:27
Respected Experts in this platform,
I am a newly enrolled Advocate in a small district of Chhattisgarh, and I need a small favor so please help me out with some relevant judgments for husband's bail for charged under section 498A IPC.
All the facts logged in FIR are false, like same as every case out there that the husband had a dowry demand, mental torturous, etc.
please do help me with relevant judgments.
Anonymous
17 June 2022 at 13:35
I went to PS & lodged GDE. Police take action on GDE. But I am not happy upon police. Can I go to court for lodge FIR u/ s 156 (3) CRPC ?
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/ask_query.asp
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Wrongful concealing of my son
After my wife's remarriage she has taken my son to an unknown address. I have heared that she is planning to sale my son. I didn't know where my son is.
I approach local police station but they didn't help.
How could I get my son back for his welfare ?