Amy Ruffin
10 May 2010 at 22:57
Sir
I am living in a house which I have inherited after my fathers death and one of my fathers brother is staying in a portion of the ground floor with his family and was supposed to leave the house along with his family after my fathers death is not vacating and troubling us by stopping our water supply and using foul and abusive language. Two weeks back I talked to my Uncle and told him I will get switch put separately to boost up the water and I went with the plumber three four times but they kept on refusing and asking us to come later. Then I went downstairs and opened the door and got the work done after which my Uncle came and started abusing/threatening us and beating up the plumber. He even picked up a stone to hit him on his head so two three of us caught him to stop him. Then we went to police station and lodged a complaint and got the medical examination done for the plumber though he was saved and had minor bruises. Also we have CCTV footage of the incident which I have shown to the SHO and DCP but they are hesitant and not lodging an FIR as Uncle is a senior official in the government. Please advise what I should do to get an FIR through court, what is the process and how long does it normally take as now they are further threatening us that police will not take any action on them and they will get away scot free
Anonymous
10 May 2010 at 09:42
I AM BEING ASKED TO STAND AS A WITTNESS IN A CASE FOR THE ACCUSED WHERE HE IS BEING ACCUSED FOR DISHONOURING OF POST DATED CHEQUES.
WHAT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY. DO I HAVE TO PAY UP THE MONEY IN CASE HE DOES NOT?
DO I HAVE TO APPEAR EVERYTIME HE IS SUMMONED?
IN CASE HE DISAPPEARS , WHAT IS MY LIABILITY .
WHAT HAPPENS TO ME IN CAS HE DOES NOT APPEAR FOR A COURT SUMMON
Anonymous
10 May 2010 at 08:36
A lodges a complaint with police against B for putting up an unauthorized hut on A's land. In the police enquiry, B denies that he has got anything to do with the hut. The enquiry is closed accordingly. Later on A removes the hut on his land. Now, C files a complaint with the same police against A for dismantling his hut, claiming as owner of the said land. Now is 'A''s act illegal under IPC or any other law. In an earlier title suit between the predecessors' in title of A and C, the decision was given by a civil court in favour of A's predecessor's in title in an exparte decree. Till date the exparte decree has not been set aside. Can the title issue again be agitated by the successors in title.?
Anonymous
10 May 2010 at 00:54
Sir,
A person has obtained an order of Circle Officer with submitting fake document and Circle officer too has colluded with him and has manipulated entire order sheet, in one date CO (Circle officer) has put signature on that date even he was not posted here. Does this come under cheating or any other criminal section? Is documentary evidence is sufficient or any other evidence is reqd.?
Thanks and regds.
charanjeet singh
09 May 2010 at 20:52
Is complaint of dishounoured cheque with endorsement 'signature differ' is maintainable U/S 138?
If yes, any authority regarding this?
Anonymous
09 May 2010 at 20:44
Can the informant under Section 378 of Crpc go on appeal against the acquttal of the accused?
Anonymous
09 May 2010 at 20:41
can presiding judges be made party in any appeal as he has tampered evidence on record in a murder case and can punished by higher courts and under what provision a complaint can be lodged against the presiding judge
Anonymous
09 May 2010 at 20:07
i am the informant in sec 302 ipc case and the accused are acquited and can i file any revision are appeal against such acquittal before high court and if can,means under what provision of CRPC
Anonymous
09 May 2010 at 19:38
the applicant is a transporter and provided transport facility to party in tune of 10 lac.the party issued the cheque of rs 10 lac to applicant.but when cheque deposited by applicant the same returned with memo "cheque destroyed in system" what is this is it covered under 138 ni act any citation please.when applicant asked the meaning of memo the bank replies that party had cancelled the said cheque.
Information Technology
Dear Sir, a minor has done child pornography and the police has filed complain against him. There is no any other crime and this was done in school students group. More than 12 students were together but the computer was used from the residence of minor and there fore their is a charged of pornography under information technology act. The student is bright in his study and through out his career is above 85%. What can be the defence to come out from this issue.