Mohammed Vaid
30 December 2010 at 17:00
Hi,
A fraudulant transaction has been done on my Manhattan credit card for Rs. 2200/- and Rs. 1820/-. Amounts are paid to MTNL Mumbai and Reliance Energy Mumbai respectively.
I have raised a dispute with the bank and also planning to file a police complaint about the same of my residence area.
I need to know actually what should I do as I hadn't came across such situation ever. Please guide me.
Regards,
Mohammed.
Anonymous
30 December 2010 at 13:00
How the investigating agency establish demand, acceptance.
WHEN :
1. The work for which the bribe is being paid to a legal attorney engaged by him . nowhere in the voice transcription recordings it is shows there is a demand. Only the complainant repeatedly tells the money and the amount.
2. The govt employees cannot do that work. Neither they are dealing with the file nor they have jurisdiction nor empowered to do the same. Only the officer in the rank of cabinet secretary can do this work. no ldc or udc can do this work. and the officer has clearly mentioned in the letter given to the agency clearly mentioned the work of the accused.
3. His own attoney recevied the amount and was caught by the agency. Complainant another attorney says this amount belongs to some govt employees. then the other attorney was asked to contact those govt employees.
4.the attorney who wa caught red handed didnot know or have any time met those govt employees. But on the directions of agency and the other attorney he hands over the amt to the govt employee on some pretext. Even during his conversation with the govt employee there s no mentione of money or demand etc.
WILL THE CHARGES BE FRAMED.
SINCE THE GOVT EMPLOYEE DOES NOT KNOW FOR WHY THE MONEY WAS HANDED OVER TO HIM. HOW WILL HE MANAGE.
THESE TWO ATTORNEYS STATEMENTS IN COURT WILL BE OF ANY BENEFIT
Anonymous
29 December 2010 at 22:24
My in-laws filed case u/s 406 against me and my parents.Cases against my parents have been quashed by the High Court based on my wife's submission before the court in her case u/s 125 as it was in total variance with her complaint in the case u/s 406.
What remedy do we have in IPC against such false cases?
Do we have sufficient ground to seek damages for malicious prosecution?
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
29 December 2010 at 21:17
The Online trading company issued cheque to their investor for Sum of Rs. One crore (1 chq 1 investor). No documents in support of investments, and No other suportive documents in favour of cheque , or payment . in this situation 138 case filed against trading company . HOw will this case maintainable ? any judgement in favour of this type of case ? kindly post it..
Anonymous
29 December 2010 at 19:21
a person known to me was charged u/s 506(ii).the chargesheet was filed after 112 days in court.Is it valid to demand dismissal of the case on grounds that the chargesheet was not filed in 90 days.
As there are different opinions,some of which say it is absolutely not necessary for filing chargesheet in 90 days,there is some confusion.
Secondly,the allegation of the complainant was he was threatened wich a weapon but no fingerprints of accused were found on the alleged weapon.Can this be a plus for the accused.Opinion again differs here.
I would like to have a correct opnion of the above at the earliest.
Member (Account Deleted)
29 December 2010 at 16:43
If an order of stay reads as:
Respondent no.1 accepts notice. Let the notice be issued to respondent no.2, in the meanwhile the operation of impugned order shall remain stayed.
Is the respondent no.2 entitled to ask the court to vacate the stay upon appearance into the matter?
What if court does not vacate the stay?
Can an application for vacation of stay be filed seperately?
Member (Account Deleted)
29 December 2010 at 15:58
an order was challenged before high court in a civil service case, being illegal, decietful, fake, fraudulent and forged.
The high court justified the order but did not touch the grounds of fraud, forgery and decietfullness.
Is it for that the civil court is not a competent court for commenting on same?
there was no any defence raised by respondents against these grounds.
Can we move to criminal court for establishing the fraud committed by respondents in issuance of the said order?
Order is certainly fake.
Member (Account Deleted)
29 December 2010 at 15:16
What is the difference between false and forged document ?
R.SHAH
29 December 2010 at 12:09
sir,
my ex-wife by concealing /suppressing her remarried material facts obtain order in session court. and same order was executed in lower court for amount beyond her remarraige date. now i m planning to file fraud case can IPC 415 & 420 be attracted in my case along with IPC 209 & 210.
kindly be advise
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
recovery of cell phone in jail
Dear Experts
This is my subsequent query because previous answer was illusive.Whether recovery of cell phone from a prisoner is contravention of sec 120 A of the IPC and punishable U/s 120 b(2) of the IPC or not? please opine