Anonymous
06 February 2011 at 16:25
what will be the effect of a subsequent bail petition u/s 439 Cr.p.c in the court of sessions judge by a different petitioner for an accused person when a petition of the same kind moved by an another petitioner in the same court for the same accused person is in the pending state
Anonymous
06 February 2011 at 13:54
Sir,
What is the Summery Report A, B, C
and for what and when it is filed by Police authirities when FIR is lodged by complainant ?
Can this be challenged by the complainant? How?
Anonymous
06 February 2011 at 10:34
Dear sir/Madam,
by taking the corner of my wife .family member of my wife are destroying my family.
can i file case for the jewellery ,money what they have of mine and refused officially through reply of notice.
i have proof that they have my money and jewellery of my wife .
can i file a case for the same?
kingly suggest me under what section i can file a case.
Iwould like to appoint a lawyer for the same but atleast i want to know the possibility of such case.
thank you in advance
warm regards
Anonymous
06 February 2011 at 09:29
conviction and sentence of 6 months by the Metropolitan Magistrate for an offence under 138 Neg Ins Act has been upheld by the court of sessions in Criminal Appeal. accused is in custody. What is the remedy? Would it be Criminal Revision before Hon'ble High Court?
Anonymous
06 February 2011 at 08:14
When can a civil court take matter under Sec 340 Cr.P.C and how to refer to criminal court?
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
06 February 2011 at 00:33
My learned Friend,
If the case is on trial at the stage of recording the complainant evidences presented by prosecution/complainant then if the witness were died or is untraceable then can we add new list of witnesses for recording the evidences although we have not disclosed about other witnesses in the criminal case till now.
i.e
New witnesses which we found can also be added in the any stage of criminal trial. ?
Anonymous
05 February 2011 at 23:40
Dear Experts,
1) If street vendors of sweets in roadside bazaars of Noida(Uttar Pradesh) use cheap harmful colors in sweets like jalebees etc. to impart bright orange color, which laws are violated?
2) Complain to which public authority for taking action?
suman
05 February 2011 at 21:04
Pls send me format of board resolution for
authorising a person to file/ defend a case against the company and to do all nessessary acts on behalf of company.
Pls reply soon.
Anonymous
05 February 2011 at 19:58
In a case filed u/s 138 NIA for chq bounced in July 2010, the bank return memo exhibited by bank was dated July 2008. It was confronted during cross examination. On next date during continuation of cross the bank produces another memo with rectified date as July 2010, while in its cross bank had already stated that chq was presented only once and then the case was filed (since cheque also belonged from the same bank and branch so probably they reprinted new return memo and therefore there would also be no records of sending cheque in clearing at the time of making the case u/s 138). The Court is also happy to accept and ready to take on records the new memo. There was no application from either side or any order from the Court to the bank to produce another memo in lieu of exhibited memo.
Question
1) Can at this stage Court without any application from either of the parties and without any orders from the Court till date accept a new document from the complainant at the stage of cross, with no such directions to produce it ?
2) if no, pl let us know some citation / section on this point which bars so.
3) is the interest of accused not harmed when new document is presented by complainant bank to cover its mistake / lacune, since on the basis of return memo dated July 2008 the case does not fall u/ 138 in 2010.
Pl guide how can bank be stopped to file a fresh memo at this stage of trial.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
340 cr.p.c and Judges hesitations
S.340 Cr.P.C. gives power to the Magistrates and Civil courts to initiate prosecution on the parties who gave false evidence during the court proceedings. But, many of the Presiding officers are hesitating to order prosecution just because of the reason that they have to appear before the trail proceedings as a witness. Any body had a similar experience. Any body got favorable orders in 340 cr.p.c petition.