J.C.Mishra
11 February 2011 at 21:16
Sir,
My elder brother is a physically challenged person. In our village he had a spat with one of our village persons regarding some village matters. That fellow is a worker of state ruling party. After some days of the incident one night when my nephew was on a visit to marriage party he attacked him along with some other people.Police denied to register the FIR, so my brother filed a petition in the SDJM`S court by booking the accused under section 498, 506, etc of the IPC. When the matter came to the police for investigation, the local police under the shadow of the ruling party, favoured the accused persons, granted them bail from the police station itself by manipulating the statements taken from the witnesses under section 161, without questioning any of the witnesses and finally submitted the charge sheet in the court by making them free from all the major charges.
In the meantime the main accused registered a false FIR in the name of my other family members by booking them under the same section of IPC.The concerned police authorities registered his FIR and also arrested one of my brothers and forwarded him to court. In between when we saw the biased attitude of the local police we submitted one written representation to the district S.P. demanding to inquire the matter by some senior police officer or crime branch. In return the S.P. directed one D.S.P. to inquire the matter. We complained about the partial nature of concerned police officers. That appeal remained pending for about one year and and finally some days before we came to know that the same police official has submitted in the court that my other family members whom he made accused in his false FIR are absconding and the police has also submitted the charge sheet in connection with the arrest of my brother by retaining all the charges as lodged by that man.
Please advice me what shall I do now in order to have a fair probe into all the incident so that justice can be prevailed and the involved police officials could be punished.
Moreover it is submitted that the concerned person is an anti social and is recently booked by police authorities of some other police station in a shoot out case and his advance bail has been rejected by the Hon`ble HIGH COURT but he has not been arrested till date.
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 19:37
I am an employee, as manager in a Bank.
In the year 2003, my wife filed a case against me under maintenance under CRPC 125. I was awarded Rs.5000/- that time my gross emoluments was only 6500/-. Now I am promoted as an officer and my net emoluments are Rs.25000/- above. My wife is trying to get my emoluments through Right to Information and probably she is filing against me again for increasing the maintenance. I am paying Rs.5000/- as Rs.2000 to my wife, 1000 to my younger child son (since above 18 years) and 2000 to my working daughter. As per decision I am supposed to pay Rs.2000 to my daughter till her marriage. She has probably married now (Love Marriage). What will be the consequences.
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 19:26
Are Pyramid Schemes and/ or Multi-Level Marketing Business Models illegal under Indian Law?
What kind of an agreement should be executed in order to protect one's self from criminal action/ proceedings?
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 12:14
Accuse apeel in session court but i am not Receive session court notince.one month is completed.So please advice me how to get session court notice
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 11:01
What is maximum and minimum conviction under IPC 406, Is some one directly lodge an FIR under this section or move to Court to file case under IPC 406?
Arvind Singh Chauhan
11 February 2011 at 08:22
State files withdrawal application. Whether accused has right to object or not ?
Accused is not heard generally on the point of withdrawal. What can accused do, if he wants to be acquitted after contesting the case.
Co accused arranged the withdrawal of case. But one accused wants to contest, because case was totally false and politically motivated.
gurditt Singh Saini
11 February 2011 at 06:33
Sir,
A party pleaded in civil suit supported with affidavit, that defendant was served through legal Notice under specific postal recipt no. But later on it was found that on that day a notice was received under the same postal receipt No. by the defendant, but that was not sent by Plaintiff/counsel. Whether case u/s 340 is made out against the Plaintiff or not?
Anonymous
10 February 2011 at 22:05
I were attacked by a mob led by my neighbours in a matter of land related dispute. The neighbours were claiming that I am not owner of the the disputed land. The either sides have filed FIRs on 14-03-2010. The charges against me are that I have destroyed the property of my neighbour and put him under loss by Rs.50000 t0 60000.
I have levelled charges against my neighbours that they had attacked me and beaten me and also threaten me to kill me.
Police had filed the both cases as Chapter Case and send to Mamlatdar in April 2010.
Even after more than 10 months the case is still pending. My queries are as under.
1. Within what time limit a chapter case needs to be disposed off ?
2. The FIR filed against me is not correct. Can I file defamation against the complainant after the outcome of Chapter Case ?
3. Can I become Self Witness in FIR filed by me as I am the only witness and others are willing to join as witness for me due to their safety reasons ?
prsmitra
10 February 2011 at 21:44
in the charge sheet police stated in the night time (2nd wife) killed 1st wife son stating that her husband not to sleep with him and deceased not heard her voice and murder him. the accused brought by husband as a concubine
But nobody present or see murder.
circumstance evidence only.
please give whether it is come under 302 or not or some other section
most of the witness turned hostile
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
murder case circumstantial evidence
Hi
My name is Adv Satyaram R. Gaud. I am conducting one murder trial wherein prosecution is completely relying upon circumstantial evidence mainly in connection with 2 ground 1.deceased cell phone found in possession of accused and 2. s.27 of evidence act i.e. disclosure of dead body at the instance of accused person.
So ple help me with the probable defence in this regard and relevant legal point along with applicable case laws of Bombay High court and apex court...if at all.
Comments will be appreciated...
Thax
Regard
Satya Gaud