Roopin
13 February 2011 at 11:37
Hello Sir,
A SLP is filed against the orders of high court, by supressing the material fact of petioner's status which has changed during the pendency of trial under section 138 of NI Act, the fact was also supressed from high court, is SLP maintainable?
The facts here refers to a complaint filed under section 138 of NI Act before the trial court which is dismissed for non joinder of necessary parties and legally enforceable debt, which is challenged in high court by criminal appeal. During the pendency of the case before the trial court, the propriter concern was converted into a private limited company and this fact was supressed by the complainant, both before trial court and the high court and the same suppression is continued before the apex court, hence my question, is the SLP maintainable before the apex court?
This fact has come to the knowledge of the accused very recently, hence this fact if brought before the apex court, is the SLP maintainable?
Thank you.
Sushil kumar
13 February 2011 at 11:08
dear sir
other party submitted false affidavit in court of justice,
reply filed with documented proofs submitted submitted affidavit is false
what action next by court, please ???
sushil kumar +971557078684, uae
Roopin
13 February 2011 at 09:06
Hello Sir,
A SLP is filed against the orders of high court, by supressing the material fact of petioner's status which has changed during the pendency of trial under section 138 of NI Act, the fact was also supressed from high court, is SLP maintainable?
The facts here refers to a complaint filed under section 138 of NI Act before the trial court which is dismissed for non joinder of necessary parties and legally enforceable debt, which is challenged in high court by criminal appeal. During the pendency of the case before the trial court, the propriter concern was converted into a private limited company and this fact was supressed by the complainant, both before trial court and the high court and the same suppression is continued before the apex court, hence my question, is the SLP maintainable before the apex court?
This fact has come to the knowledge of the accused very recently, hence this fact if brought before the apex court, is the SLP maintainable?
Thank you.
Anonymous
13 February 2011 at 06:47
I took loan from a bank while serving in Dubai- UAE but could not repay due to termination of my service.After a gap of 2 years I recvd a threatening letter from some agent claiming to be appointed recovery agent of overseas bank for untoward action from them if failed to resolve the issue either with them or the the bank at Dubai.Can it be legal for the recovery agent to do so.What remedy is left with me.
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 21:51
R/Members
I am a new enrolled/junior advocate,in given case a FIR has been registerted u/ss 363/366 ipc against two persons,(girl is minor but is 16 +) out of two one has approached me,who is juvenile as per his 4th class school certificate (He left school after 4th class)Police is raiding at his house,presently he is absconding,what i have to do,another accused and eloped girl both are not tracable till now.(in fact this is a consented case and girl has run away with another accused on her own wish but problem is this she is minor)i want to know i have to move anticipatory bail or i have to produce the juneline before ilaka magistrate and seek regular bail,what is law regarding police remand and bail of jujuvenile offender.With regards and thanns in advance.
Satish Yadav Rohtak
Rajesh Kumar
12 February 2011 at 12:18
I hv filed a bounce chq case for rs 75000/-in apr09 and till date person not came to court in any date of case. Although he know that case is going on. He is changing his permannent address time to time but notice is going on his permannend adddress where his family is living. Nonbailable warrent issued agst him but where he is living nobody knows.I hv signed to process a form for declaring bhogra to him through court. But I am confuse whether any thing will happen now.Pls someone help me what should I do.
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 12:04
Respected sir
In DV case can respondents can prey for mediation or this rights is reserved for applicant only.
thank you
with warm regards
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 09:03
R/Members LCI
My complaint us 138 NI act is pending in Rohtak court and fixed for appearance of accused through NBW,previously this case was also fixed for ppearance of accused through NBW,but execution of NBW could not effected,now this case is fixed for 21/03/2011 and i have came to know that in an another crl case,accused is regularly appearing in Panchkula court,Panchkula court case is now fixed for 29/3/11, how i can got execute NBW through courts (Not through police)Kindly help.Thanks
Jai Bhagwan
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
B/W passed - Proclamation u/s 82
In 138 NI case, Bailable warrant has been pending , the accused are absconded in this position u/s 82 crpc proclamation was issued by the court . is it correct one ?( with out NBW)