Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   11 May 2011 at 01:43

498a Case

Please advise a good lawyer /honest one in Vadodara

Anonymous   10 May 2011 at 23:01

criminal case

what will happen if during the time of pendency of a criminal case if accused die??

Anonymous   10 May 2011 at 20:47

SHO Or SHC

1) Public Servant comes under section 21 of the IPC But government servant can be can be called as a public servant or vice- versa. Because Government Servant are not defined. Also if they don't come under section 21 then can we book them under PC Act (prevention of corruption act) . Support the answer with the case law if any. Difference between Goverment servant & Public servant

Also sir what does SHC. Some say SHO & SHC are both the same.

2) SHO is the station house officer. Pls tell me the section where it has been defined that SHO is a station house officer. How can come under SHO category.

Thanks.

mangesh   10 May 2011 at 19:00

138 case

dear sir,we hv one partnership firm with 2partner in construction co. We added 1 more partner for finance purpose with legal documents. We hv recd part payment in firms name. after 6 months he told us to breakup partnership n return money with interest. He insist n pressurised me only for money and he took blank date pdc with written stamp paper. Now he is threatened me of ni138 act. so pl help me out for this matter.

Satyender Sharma   10 May 2011 at 15:44

N.I.Act- Account Blocked

A plot was booked with PSG Developers by paying considerable amount. However, the Developer was not having the land and they refunded the deposited amount by two cheques which were bounced on deposit by me in my Bank. The reason for return of cheques was ‘ACCOUNT BLOCKED’ of the Developer. I had served the Notice in time and also filed the case in time under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act with the Court. All ingradients of Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act attract my case except that the Developer was having sufficient funds in his account which was BLOCKED. Kindly guide me whether my case falls under Section 138 of N.I.Act as the payment was not received even on issuing Notice. Also quote some cases on the Account Blocked.

Anonymous   10 May 2011 at 14:43

D.V.[proh] Act. whether the report of protection officer is mandatory?

Husband is driver in A.P.S.R.T.C., He was married firstly one lady. She left his society at his young age. Thereafter he married my client. Her name is incorporated in service book as nominee for his benefits. My client got four children through her husband. she is now 56 years old. All the children settled. Nobody is looking after her. Husband residing with a concubine in another village. He got purchased about Ac.8-00 guntas in the name of that concubine. He saying that his retirement benefits and other benefits will not be given to my client. Accordingly my client i.e. wife filed a domestic violence [pro] case against her husband and she made his employers as proforma parties to the case. Husband did not appear though he received notices. The employers contested the case. The case is disposed in favour of the wife and directed the husband to pay the half of the retirement benefits and maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month granted till the date of payment of the half of the retirement benefits and the court directed the employers to implement the order. The things stood so. Husband filed an appeal on the said order of the JMFC. His allegation is that the court is erred in passing the order and not directed any protection officer to file his/her report with regarding to the domestic violence incident. My query is whether the report of the protection officer is mandatory or it is directory one? please clarify and suggest any citation/s. Thanks one and all.

BASKARAN S   10 May 2011 at 12:57

CONSIPRACY

A.RAJA WHO IS THE EX CABINET MINISTER OF THE PRESENT CENTRAL GOVT,HE IS THE PRIME ACCUSED OF 2G SPECTRUM CASE, TN CM'S DAUGHTER KANIMOLI ALSO ONE OF THE SHARE HOLDER OF KALAIGNAR TV IE 20% SHE IS UNDER THE SURVAILLANCE OF CBI, BUT TN CM'S ONE OF THE WIFE MRS DAYALU GOT 60% SHARE OF THE SAID TV BUT THE INVESTIGATING AGENCY FIX THE DAUGHTER IS ACCUSED WIFE IS WITNESS, THE AFORESAID TWO PERSONS ARE DOING CONSPRACY, BUT THE INVESTIGATING AGENCY SERVED SUMMONS ONLY TO DAUGHTER. WHETHER IT IS ANY OFFICIAL BIAS.

Anonymous   10 May 2011 at 12:25

Section 138 of N.I. Act - Permanent exemption

I am the Complainant. Accused has been granted permanent exemption, on the ground that he is busy person, has to travel to court and I didn't file say to his exemption application. What remedy -case laws /sections???
Thanks

Munish Kumar Garg   09 May 2011 at 23:10

Bail Cancellation - Help

Hello members

In my case the FIR was got registered U/s 498, 307, 34 IPC against Husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law on the charge that they gave poisonous substance to complainant/wife and she was forced to take it, as her parents was not able to fulfill the dowry demands of her husbands family members.

The FIR was registered and the husband was arrested on that basis but the father-in-law and mother-in-law was granted bail in the case.

As in the contents of FIR it was specifically dictated to the police by the complainant that father-in-law and mother-in-law had jointly hold the hands of complainant and the posion was administrated by her husband, but the learned Sessions Court grant Anticipatory Bail to both father-in-law and mother-in-law on the basis that they were of near about 60 years of age and how they can assist/help for administrating the posion to the complainant.

So please provide me some latest case-law on this point by which the bail already granted to them get be cancelled.

Thanks in advance.

prashant pundhir   09 May 2011 at 20:34

What to do .

Dear Experts,
I am handling a case of bank van robbery i.e. of 394,395,396,307I.P.C.,25/27A.act and the case is that the victims looted a bank van carrying the cash of 5 crore rupees .Inside the van,there is a security guard with two more employees having the licensed weapon but no one tried to secure the cash and not a single fire was done from inside the van .The only way for the defence was to mold the whole charges towards the bank staff and the security guard and I adopted that .Now the case is almost on the final stage .The statements of 313cr.p.c have been recorded .
Now the problem is that the bank also started to suspect on its innocent staff and suspended the security guard and the other employees .Is there any way to protect those innocent persons ?