Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 14:29
i have searched the google but i haven't found this rules
Maharashtra Open Prisons Rules, 1971
Maharashtra Prisons (Remission System) Rules, 1962.
With amendments if any
so it is a request to the members to help me out or can paste the above mentioned rule under this forum.
Rules required.
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 10:54
I have a cheque from my business partner which I presented to the bank and it got bounced.
Due to other urgent work I couldn't send him a legal notice within 30 days.
Can I present the cheque again (6 months valid time is still there)in the bank and get it bounced and then send legal notice?
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 09:58
In UP there is a pprocess followed by Allahabad HC in 498A cases- when a criminal writ is filed in persuance of Article 226- Quashing of FIR the court refers the case to mediation and provides 'saty of arrest' with a direction that Mediation centre should submit its results and if its successfull the cases are quashed.
Can anyone confirm that what if the mediation is successfull and both the parties agreed and signed the mediation agreement which stated some conditions like applying MC divorce and some payment.
The boys side complied and paid the amount but then the girls side did not file MC divorce petition.
Now they are praying HC to vacate the stay. Is it possible to back out from agreement at mediation centre that was as per direction of HC.
Ruchi arya
26 August 2011 at 09:48
Sir, my client has been filed FIR for 498 (A) case in may 2007. In this FIR some statement was wrongly written by police. But this FIR signed by my client because she was in tension and having fear. Now the hearing is started in court.
Can my client say actual fact in front of honorable justice on hearing date, which is not written in FIR or wrongly written? If yes kindly please how is possible? the hearing date is 30th August 2011. Please help.
Ganesha Mathur
26 August 2011 at 09:48
Hello Sirs,
A person has filed a police complaint against my friend who is living at Bangalore giving absured allegations like he is drunkard, dishonest, criminal threat to society etc. at Gujrat police station.
I was suggested to file a defamation case on it, my question the defamation case can be filed only at Gujrat or can it be filed at Bangalore also since the place of residance of my friend is at Bangalore.
Please clarify the juridiction of filing the defamation case on this.
Ganesha Mathur
26 August 2011 at 09:44
Hello Sirs,
A person has filed a police complaint against my friend who is living at Bangalore giving absured allegations like he is drunkard, dishonest, criminal threat to society etc. at Gujrat police station.
I was suggested to file a defamation case on it, my question the defamation case can be filed only at Gujrat or can it be filed at Bangalore also since the place of residance of my friend is at Bangalore.
Please clarify the juridiction of filing the defamation case on this.
Regards,
Jayesh Kumar
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 09:27
Can I demand my maintenance application above Rs.1500/- maintenance per month please discuss with case law
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 07:10
Respected LCI, A revision case is pending before the district sessions court. When the case is listed the Judge call the respondent and set her exparte and heard the revision petitioner's arguments and posted it for orders. After two hearings the respondent counsel has appeared and filed a petition to re-open the case for his arguments. Is there any provision of law so as to enable the respondent to re-open the case under Cr.P.C. Kindly clarify
kuldeep kumar
26 August 2011 at 03:12
173 2 and 173 5 what situation they cover.little doubtful taking 173 5.it says if sec 170 applies.i reach to its meaning that if police have found some evidence then attach them or if no such evidence reported simply file a report under 173 2.in this view of fact if a person want to give any document to police to be filed with in 173 5 can he do so? pls clarify
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
U/s. 138 of the n.i act
DEAR SIR,
I HAVE FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT U/S. 138 OF THE N.I ACT FOR THE DISHONOURED OF THE CHEQUE.
I HAVE NOT FILED THE PURSIS / APPLICATION FOR CLOSING OF THE EVIDENCE BUT STILL THE MAGISTRATE RECORDED THE STATEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED U/S. 313 OF C.R.P.C AND MATTER WAS KEPT FOR FINAL ARGUMENT BY WAY OF LAST CHANCE TO ME.
I FILED AN APPLICATION U/S. 311 OF C.R.P.C FOR RECALLING OF THE WITNESS THAT IS COMPLAINANT HIMSELF FOR THE PURPOSE BRINING THE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON RECORD WHICH ARE CRUCIAL AND VITAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE TRUE , CORRECT AND PROPER DECISION OF THE CASE. AFTER RECORDED THE STATEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED U/S. 313 OF C.R.P.C
THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S 311 OF C.R.P.C STANDS REJECTED.
PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR VIEWPOINTS
ARE THERE ANY JUDGMENT WHICH STATES THAT IF I HAVE NOT FILED THE PURSIS / APPLICATION FOR CLOSING OF THE EVIDENCE. BUT STILL THE MAGISTRATE RECORDED THE STATEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED U/S. 313 OF C.R.P.C AND MATTER WAS KEPT FOR FINAL ARGUMENT BY WAY OF LAST CHANCE TO ME.
WHAT TO DO FOR BRINING THE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON RECORD.
PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR OPINION & REFERENCE ON IT.
THANK YOU