Anonymous
09 March 2018 at 18:26
Case Related to ipc 306 ,
santosh dandekar
09 March 2018 at 12:29
I have my land in Vasai. My neighbour has made boundry around it and now he says that the land belongs to him and he has left no entry for me to enter in my land.
Sunil kumar
08 March 2018 at 22:39
Sir, I am a male person, Myself is working in central govt of India as civilian. My problem is that the director of my office is bent upon to make me harass in every right or wrong way. To fulfil his aim he deputed me under a lady officer whose image was not good. By doing my job that particular no. Of time threaten me for her lady aspect. When I informed my director in written he did not take any action and after my complaint that lady officer give a presentation in writing complaining that her case should be treated in ICC. She makes complaints for official work takin shelter of ICC or took profit of being lady. My director after 5 months initiate a enquiry by ICC. ICC rejects her complaints but without explaining any reason. Even they did not deliver the report or copy of the detailed decision. I got letter from my office admin that her complaints has been rejected. Not only this there are several things which attempted by the admin of my office on behalf of director but luckily they could not get success to fix me as I was not any kind of fault but they tried so many times.
Please let me know what can I do against my director and that lady and for ICC also as there are several things which is done by ICC is absolutely illegal.
Please guide me.
Anonymous
08 March 2018 at 20:09
I have received notice for attending investigation in crpc 160. The case under which i was summoned is written as section 363 u/s 364a/307. I have not a slight idea about that case and i had never involved in any criminal case. Recently i lost my mobile, a had submitted a written application for which in police station. Do i have been summoned because anybody misused it? I don't know what to do People are saying me that they'll falsely accuse me.
Member (Account Deleted)
08 March 2018 at 11:53
Hi,
Is it mandatory to attend all the accused in 498a in examination stage?
one of the accused ran away to abroad and not coming to court and dragging the case to avoid the jailing.
Is there any way to cancel his AB and give NBW or look out notice or red corner notice?
Thanks,
Swetcha
krishna
08 March 2018 at 11:21
in the case of dowry death the trial has yet to start its been over 9months after incident chargesheet is filed how long does the trial to start
Anonymous
07 March 2018 at 23:03
Concerned person is currently out on bail since Sep-2012.Was in police custody for 1 day and judicial custody for 1 day.Last attended court-basically sat in lawyer's chamber in court premises in Dec-2014.Have not received any court summons and not received any copy of chargesheet as well. Lawyer cannot be traced.
Now passport is due for renewal.What should the person mention in the section under "Criminal case declaration"?How and where to find the current status of the case?Please advice.Thanks in advance.
Ashish
07 March 2018 at 20:38
Hi,
I would like to know can a law seal my parents property if the case of 138 is registered under my name.
Police are harnessing my parents saying they will put them behind bars and seal there property.
Please guide me what has to be done
Docok
06 March 2018 at 22:10
respected lawyers
recently my close acquaintance an elderly woman of 67 years involved in a ni case, the woman is the accused, she has taken loan from one person for 1 lakh by issuing blank promissory note and one blank cheque, after repaying the loan the friend did not return the cheque and promissory note and filed in court through his friend for 5 lakhs promissory note and 3 lakhs cheque amount. the accused did not attend the court summons for NI act and NWB is issued, one day the accused was suddenly arrested and taken to court, the police who took bribe and the other lawyer threatened her outside that if the lawyer does not sign no objection certificate she will go to jail and threatened her to tell in court she will pay amount, she admit in court that she will pay amount and next day did not attend court, again NWB is issued, the accused approached the high court to dispense the condition of 3 lakhs requirement to pay to respondent to avail the bail, the high court directed her to surrender in the lower court and take bail and ordered the court when she surrenders use normal conditions to give bail
the case has been tried, the accused through her lawyer rebutted the claim of sec 139 and the complainanat in his cross examination admitted that he is an income tax assessee and that he will fill the income tax returns of that year as he has shown the statement of loan in that but he filed the income tax returns
the accused lawyer contend with the court that the income tax assessee did not file the income tax returns as such the money would be undisclosed amount and cannot be a legally enforceable debt
the accussed lawyer also contend that even if debt exists and cheque was issued and dishonoured when the money is unaccounted it cannot be legally enforceable
the accused lawyer also contend that as per Section 269SS of IT act the amount of 5 lakhs is given in cash form and not in a cheque or dd form hence the transaction is illegal in view of law
but no matter how much the accussed lawyer contended with the court on the legality of the money the court has finally given judgement that the money legal or illegal does not matter that the accused admitted in court that day for one day that she will pay the amount and that it is binding on her and gave judgement
but the lawyer is stating that as per SC judgements and other high court judgements even if the debt exists and cheque is bounced for undisclosed amount the income tax is enough to label the money as illegal and cannot be legally recovered
he quoted mainly http://hc.tap.nic.in/hcorders/2015/crla/crla_394_2015.pdf
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/185077995/
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/164448233/
but judge is insiting on the only point that the accused enlarged on bail and now has to pay the money
the accused only told in court to enlarge on bail and she felt threatened by dire consequences by the opposition lawyer is there no relief for the accused to prosecute the complainant and win the ni appeal case sidelining the admission in court
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Compounding in case of NI 138 cases
If a person wants to make compounding by depositing the amount of cheque in first or second hearing what will be implications in this case?
What are right of the complainant whose amount was paid through court ?
Will there be any amount charged by court for such settlement?
How the complainant will get the interest and cost of the case in case of settlement and what amount t will be granted in this case?