PURSHOTAM BEHL
08 March 2009 at 07:59
D/sirs,
I want to file a PIL in Delhi HC against the entry of overloaded trucks ,in delhi , kindly suggest.
I have already given notices to Commissioner Transport, DCP-SW, and JCT -police.what to do next?
N.K.Assumi
08 March 2009 at 06:04
If a woman refused to appear before the police station in a summon under section 160 of the CrPc, can she be prosecuted under section 174 of the IPC?
N.K.Assumi
08 March 2009 at 05:38
Dear Members,
Consider this.Bail can be moved even on holiday like sunday etc. For a Christian sunday is a very solemn and pious day. Now if an accused approach a magistrate for bail in his residence on sunday, can the Magistrate says that "Its Sunday and I dont work on Sunday" Come on monday. Is it proper?
mahesh verma
07 March 2009 at 20:01
i filed one case of negotableinstrucment
for recovery of amount due to dishonour of chque. the trial court issued summon to the accused and fixed a date for his statement. on the hearing date i could not attned the court as well as my lawyer could not attend the court. the trial court dismissd the case under section 256 of cr.p.c. I filed a case before session court for revision of the case but the session court also dismissed the case under section401 , 256 (1), 378 (3)( 5 )
401 (5)
please advise me now, what step could i take to prosecute the accused under negotiable instrument act 1881
mahesh verma
07 March 2009 at 19:59
i filed on case of negotableinstrucment
for recovery of amount due to dishonour of chque. the trial court issued summon to the accused and fixed a date for his statement. on the hearing date i could not attned the court as well as my lawyer could not attend the court. the trial court dismissd the case under section 256 of cr.p.c. I filed a case before session court for revision of the case but the session court also dismissed the case under section401 , 256 (1), 378 (30 ( 5 )
401 (5)
please advise me now, what step could i take to prosecute the accused under negotiable instrument act 1881
N.K.Assumi
07 March 2009 at 17:14
Does the doctrine of Resjudicata applies in Criminsl case?
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
07 March 2009 at 12:08
dear sirs,
i would like to know some facts about examination of witnesses in the open court,with special emphasise on cross-examination .that is :
1.what actually is a "CONTRADICTION " AND what actually is an " OMISSION " in the deposition of a witness.?
2.if a witness deposes against / deviates from/ omits from his previous statement,how i should mark such portion ?3.should i put a question that "YOU HAVE NOT GIVEN SUCH A STATEMENT EARLIER TO POLICE U/S 161 CRPC ?
4. THEN , SHOULD I ASK THE SAME QUESTION TO THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER THAT WITNESS HAS NOT GIVEN SUCH A STATEMENT TO YOU DURING INVESTIGATION ?
5.AN INCIDENT WAS WITNESSED BY A SOLE INDIPENDANT WITNESS. COMPLAINANT AND OTHER WINESSES ADMITS THAT " HE " HAS SEEN THE INCIDENT.BUT, HE WAS NOT MADE AS A WITNESS IN THE PROSECUTION CASE.NOW, DURING TRIAL,I WANT TO ASK "WHY HE WAS NOT MADE AS A WITNESS".TO WHOOM ,I CAN PUT THIS QUESTION ? TO THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER OR TO THE CHARGE SUBMITTING OFFICER ? ie, WHO IS THE PERSON HAVING THE POWER TO ADD/ ARRAY/DELETE WITNESSES.....INVESTIGATION OFFICER OR CHARGE SUBMITTING OFFICER ?
PLEASE EXPLAIN IN DETAILS .
ALSO, SUGGEST ME, SOME RULINGS OF HIGH COURT AND APEX COURT.
WHICH PORTION OF EVIDENCE ACT SAYS ABOUT ALL THESE FACTS ?
6. MY LAST QUESTION IS THAT WHETHER A JUDGE/ MAGISTRATE CAN REFUSE TO NOTE DOWN THE QUESTION BY A COUNSEL AND ANSWER BY A WITNESS, ON THE GROUND THAT IT IS IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE ON HAND OR THE MAG /JUDGE HAS TO WRITE ALL QUESTION AND ANSWERS, AS MANDATORY ?
THANKS SIRS SALILKUMAR
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
09447536929
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
07 March 2009 at 12:08
dear sirs,
i would like to know some facts about examination of witnesses in the open court,with special emphasise on cross-examination .that is :
1.what actually is a "CONTRADICTION " AND what actually is an " OMISSION " in the deposition of a witness.?
2.if a witness deposes against / deviates from/ omits from his previous statement,how i should mark such portion ?3.should i put a question that "YOU HAVE NOT GIVEN SUCH A STATEMENT EARLIER TO POLICE U/S 161 CRPC ?
4. THEN , SHOULD I ASK THE SAME QUESTION TO THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER THAT WITNESS HAS NOT GIVEN SUCH A STATEMENT TO YOU DURING INVESTIGATION ?
5.AN INCIDENT WAS WITNESSED BY A SOLE INDIPENDANT WITNESS. COMPLAINANT AND OTHER WINESSES ADMITS THAT " HE " HAS SEEN THE INCIDENT.BUT, HE WAS NOT MADE AS A WITNESS IN THE PROSECUTION CASE.NOW, DURING TRIAL,I WANT TO ASK "WHY HE WAS NOT MADE AS A WITNESS".TO WHOOM ,I CAN PUT THIS QUESTION ? TO THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER OR TO THE CHARGE SUBMITTING OFFICER ? ie, WHO IS THE PERSON HAVING THE POWER TO ADD/ ARRAY/DELETE WITNESSES.....INVESTIGATION OFFICER OR CHARGE SUBMITTING OFFICER ?
PLEASE EXPLAIN IN DETAILS .
ALSO, SUGGEST ME, SOME RULINGS OF HIGH COURT AND APEX COURT.
WHICH PORTION OF EVIDENCE ACT SAYS ABOUT ALL THESE FACTS ?
6. MY LAST QUESTION IS THAT WHETHER A JUDGE/ MAGISTRATE CAN REFUSE TO NOTE DOWN THE QUESTION BY A COUNSEL AND ANSWER BY A WITNESS, ON THE GROUND THAT IT IS IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE ON HAND OR THE MAG /JUDGE HAS TO WRITE ALL QUESTION AND ANSWERS, AS MANDATORY ?
THANKS SIRS SALILKUMAR
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
09447536929
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Plea bargaining
What is plea bargaining .what is its procedure.