Dear Sir,
Can it pls be reply-
A deemed registred Ltd, company collects the a deposit/advances, remained attahced with its principal company which is public-listed one in BSE/NSE/etc: ok.
Now after taking money, appointing agancy workings,start harrasnments, diladalla, & issues payments for admitted liability, which is made to stop -dishonestly,?
[ 138 case filed, in 32/35 days,]
Also fails to refunds the dues,claims, etc, but
sells out its shares,rights,etc to third party.
What are the steps under which such section- rule- acts etc are in existance, to curbed and controll & making awareness to Public too,can be adopted.
which are different courts are to be approached, compalint to be sent, where, how, with along with Police stn if so, pls guide.
thanks
janaki raman
i have some business transaction with a company. these transaction run around five year . in 2005 company unwritten demand some security cheque .i have give around 15 cheque blank cheque only company name is mentions. And my signature amount
column is blank .
23th of july 2009 I closed that account due to some problem . immediately I inform company person . due to some dispute our business is closed .
Company present some cheque on 22.9.2009 due to account closed the cheque is dishonored . they send me legal notice 19.11.2009 . i file a criminal case against you.
Dear sir
1. i have evidence that cheque is issued in 2005
2. I inform the company that account is closed
i have some business transaction with a company. these transaction run around five year . in 2005 company unwritten demand some security cheque .i have give around 15 cheque blank cheque only company name is mentions. And my signature amount
column is blank .
23th of july 2009 I closed that account due to some problem . immediately I inform company person . due to some dispute our business is closed .
Company present some cheque on 22.9.2009 due to account closed the cheque is dishonored . they send me legal notice 19.11.2009 . i file a criminal case against you.
Dear sir
1. i have evidence that cheque is issued in 2005
2. I inform the company that account is closed
P. PARASURAMAN,
N. SANKAR,
ADVOCATES,
VELLORE -9.
DEAR FRIENDS,
PLEASE LET ME CLARIFY WHETHER THE SPECIAL OFFICER (IMPLIED BY NAME) OF A CO.OP SUGAR MILL IS LIABLE FOR THE DEATH OF A WORKER OF THE SUGAR MILL WHILE HE WAS HIT BY THE REVERSING CONTRACT CANE LORRY IN THE UNLOADING SITE OF THE SUGAR MILL CAMPUS UNDER FACTORY ACT ON THE PRETEXT OF NEGLIGENCE AND LACK OF SUPERVISION, APART FROM THE PROSECUTION OF THE LORRY DRIVER UNDER 304 (A) IPC, COMPENSATION BY THE MILL AND COMPENSATION UNDER MCOP. AT THE TIME OF ACCIDENT, THE SPECIAL OFFICER WAS HOLDING ADDITIONAL CHARGE ONLY. FURTHER THE DIRECT SUPERVISING OFFICER (FACTORY MANAGER) HAS ALSO BEEN PROSECUTED UNDER THE FACTORIES ACT. WHEN THE FACTORY MANAGER WHO WAS DIRECTLY SUPERVISING HAS BEEN IMPLICATED IS IT NECESSARY TO PROSECUTE THE SPECIAL OFFICER WHO WAS HOLDING ADDITIONAL CHARGE THAT TOO BY HIS NAME INSTEAD OF DESIGNATION. APPROPRIATE CITATIONS MAY KINDLY BE GIVEN.
when a magistrate order u/sec 156(3) he received report u/sec 173(1) & taking cognigence u/sec 190(1)(a)
Expect it u/sec.202 gets report u/sec.173(2) & taking cognigence u/sec.190(1)(b)
is it all right. pls varify these statement
Sir I wanted to know that which type of defences available to accused in SC & ST Act. What is the meaning with in public perview. Whether at the time of commission of offence any person from Swaran Communnity is necessarry. Whether the person who belonged to Backward class can be made accused in SC and ST Act.riven
Our family is in serious problem . Please help us with an honest suggestion regarding a fake IPC 420 case on my father . Before i convey my problem let me start from beginning . My father is a superintending engineer in Coal India(psu) presently posted in jhanjhra area (west bengal). He was trasferred from korba (chhatisgarh) to this present location in january 2008 . As my father was holding key position in previous posting and being a civil engineer had to deal with different contractors working for coal india. But when he was transferred one contractor who had not a good relation with my father took advantage of the situation and started asking for some money(40k) telling my father has taken from him . While my father is a honest man and never taken any money from him , hence refused all together . Therefore when my father was transferred, after 20 days that contractor lodged a false case of IPC 420 on 22nd jan 2008 that too not as a bribe but ''my father has taken 83 thousand rupee (double the amount that he bargained ) on the name of giving him employment'' . As a witness he pressurised two other contractors . The problem is that the person has a good relation with Town Inspector and the local MLA and therefore the investigation we suppose is a myth . Here i would like to tell that they have no proof as check , draft , my father's signature , etc and all the witness are verbal . My second point is that employment in coal india is not a subject of any civil engineer and they are nowhere in the scene . Even when investigation was done by local police in my father's project, the same enquired from different departments and said that no job application or land aquisition request is there in any department ( we have the copy of that). Henceforth my father applied in local court for anticipatory bail but was rejected stating 'the investigation is still under process '. So my father as per advocate's instruction waited for the primary investgation to be completed and got busy in his work , (he also felt that since this case is just to blackmail hence the police my itself dismiss FIR). This year one day a person phoned telling that the police may come any moment to arrest him so better take an anticipatory bail . Perturbed my father hired a lawyer in bengal and sent him to chhatisgarh court to seek AB . But perhaps papa failed to recognize the wisdom of lawyer, he again went to the same court and moved a petition but instead of writing "second" wrote down " first " , hence lower court told rejected it stating the fact and said to ask for oppology to honourable court . He did the same and got 16th sept 2009 date for hearing but due to unavailibility of case diary gave 23rd sept 2009 as next date . Meanwhile on 19th evening few inspectors came to arrest him and took him to korba by road . As per rule they should take him to court but instead they freed him in korba . This shows they didn't come to arrest him on permission of court and what we came to know afterwards that "to arrest someone from other jurisdiction they must have permission of the court where they are going to arrest a person . So the reason to take my father there was to intimidate him and succum to the demand of complainant (the IO asked a big amount to dismiss the complaint). But again my father refused and left that place . Yes i forgot to mention that after bringing him to korba the policemen said that sought out the problem we have never shown anywhere that we arrested you (but back in west bengal few of my father's well wisher kept the copy of arrest ). By the way on 23rd when again hearing started the judge called my lawyer and said there is no need for hearing as once your bail plea is already rejected in this court so we are legally bound not to give u bail and it won't be appropriate to reject yet again and move this plea to high court you will get bail there . Actually now after this much problem we came to know that never move for AB or bail where it isriven
tell me about sec. 27 of evidence act in the context of sec. 162 of cr.p.criven
sir , whether I.P.C is a matter of concurrent list .AS recently u/sec.377 Delhi H.C.declared a popular decision in this respect & provided validity to the Homosexuality in Delhi.riven
where /what is the provision to pro a free copy of bail reje
Dear frients,
where/What is the provision of law or circular to provide a free copy of Bail rejection order to a UTP.