krishnamohan
08 January 2010 at 21:31
i want to know colonel in military is he equal to which rank in police whether he can give orders to ci, dysp of police look out the matters he is giving
Anonymous
08 January 2010 at 21:29
hai,
one case is filed on 13/04/2005 with u/s 447,506 r/w 34 ipc. then immediatly he take bail.from that time he dont know about that case status. my question is how to know his case status now?
Venu Gopal Haritash
08 January 2010 at 16:04
Please provide any suggestion or any ruling which counter in the court's ruling passed in the case of Harman Electronics Vs National Panasinoc ltd year 2000 for the territorial jurisdiction.
Rahul Deshpande
08 January 2010 at 15:29
My client has been registered under a criminal case & charged by police constable under IPC section 34,353 in year 1998. The case has come up for evidance now. The charges have been framed. Like to know whether court can acquit him under following circumstances:
Kindly guide on following.
1.What are the ground on which the accused can be acquitted by court?
2.Does the non-attachment of attendence sheet or duty sheet to chargesheet( to prove he was on duty) by constable can be strong reason to prove that circumstances as to case did not exsists?
3.Incase constable produces record of his attendance during course of trial - will that be admissible as evidence keeping in view the fact that he did not attach it initially with chargesheet?
4.The statement of doubt has been made in the chargesheet that accused could have been under influence of alcohol- but no medical/blood test report has been atttached. Will this favour accused?
5. What will constitute as material evidence in this case? Does the witness account constitute material evidence?
5. Can accused get permanent exemption during course of trial incase counsel applies for it?
Looking forward to your opinion.
Rahul Deshpande
08 January 2010 at 00:44
My client has been registered under a criminal case & charged by police constable under IPC section 34,353 in year 1998. The case has come up for evidance now. The charges have been framed. Like to know whether judge can discharge him under following circumstances:
1. Incase prosecution witness deny that they do not remember the event.
2. Incase prosecution witness does not turn up or police constable does not turn up
3. Incase police constable did not to attch duty report or attendance to prove he was on duty at the time of event to the chargesheet
4.If not under above; any other things which you can suggest which can go favourable for him.
Furhter ,like to know the case judgements that will be helpful in this case with a general opinion in regard to judgements in IPC353 cases
What would be the circumstances in which he can be acquited keeping in view the fact that case is around 12 yrs old & burden of proof is on state.
Thanks
Saket
abdulrahaman
07 January 2010 at 23:17
Dear sir ,
kindly clarify by givingcase law.
1) If a complainant by keeping his own employee as main Accused filed a criminal case aganst other employee and third parties for the breach of trust and non execution of contract ,cheating,etc to the extent of 2 crores .The main accused was working with the employer even after filing criminal case until the other persons were arrested.
How far this case is valid in the eyes of law?
Anonymous
06 January 2010 at 11:33
i would like to lodge complain against blackmailer for the black mailing the my client i would like to refer the law of it so pls provdie the full name of the said act and if possible then provide the soft copy of the said act
Anonymous
06 January 2010 at 10:16
Dear Experts,
MR X had joined a rival group of company after getting an offer letter from the rival gruop.The previous employer threatned through his HR head that if he joins the rival company they will defame him, harrass him and register a police complain.Mr X has got this threatining call recorded in his cell phone. Mr X aslo gave a writtn complain to the Police Comm stating that he would be framed by the big people as addmitted in the tape. No action or inquiry made on this. Later the previous employer registered a false complain u/s 420, 467, 468 ,114 112- b etc. because of his contacts. Mr X failed to quash and get A/B from high court. Mr X has to remain out of sight due to this.The complainent has not given any proofs of the IPC's stated to the police, but his intention was to harras MR X and not allow him to continue the new Job.MR X has all relevant documents to prove his innocence, but his apprenhension is that ,police may not take everything on records because they might be questioned later on for registering a false complain. Of course the police is not harassing the accused or his family but how can he put an end to this mis fortune? Going to jail and getting a regular bail is the only remedy? The IPC registered are grave but with no proofs,because this was to only harrass Mr X. and keep him away from the new job.
Urgent guidance needed.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Atrocities Act-plz help
I had filed a complaint against a person that he had verbally abused me, which I couldn't prove; he (the opposite party/respondent) had stated that their was no communication between both of us, and that he do not know me; and has very cunningly stated that I am putting false case against him since he belongs to SC(schedule caste) category and requested that action should be taken against me under atrocities act. I had not made any comment about his caste, in fact was even unaware about his caste. Please comment.(note I am from open/genera/non reserved category)
{one of a good move is to state that for action to be taken against me under the above mentioned act;I have to be non SC/ST; though I am not SC/ST; as per his own statement he do not know me, hence even do not know my caste, hence this indicates that even before knowing proper facts in detail he is trying to misuse law and put false counter case against me}