Anonymous
18 February 2010 at 12:36
sir,bank memo main cheqe dishonour ka reson para 16 main no account\account close on advise likha tha. magar apradh vivran main insufficiant fund likh diya gaya.parivadi ne 215 216 ka aavedan dekar apradh vivran main sudhar ki mang kari,jismain maine objection karte hue kaha ki 215 216 varant mamle ke liye hai.138 summon mamla hai,jisme apradh vivran 251 se 259 main badalne ki koi vyavastha nahi hai,aapki kya openion hai.
SATYANARAYANA K
17 February 2010 at 23:57
My client is complainant in 498 A of I.P.C case, now my client wanted to withdraw the case, presently the case is in Crime stage and police did not file charge sheet till now, due to her complaint her husband Central Govt Job lost, there is no income Department ordered as after closed the 498 a case then job will be reinstated, due to that reason, my client suffering as a humanity hence she wanted to withdraw the case against her husband immediately please suggest sir
My query is (1) if my client withdraw the case in crime stage is there any problem, (2)If after withdraw the case if husband again harass my client is there same value before the Police station (3) If harass my client May give complaint again u/s 498 a is it possible to accept the case by police. if there is any section to withdraw the case immediately please give with full details, waiting for your valuable replies, thanks to all experts
suhasini
17 February 2010 at 22:42
Respected sir,
Is brainwash a crime? If it is then what are the evidence which can help the victim.
Thanking you.
vinod bansal
17 February 2010 at 22:15
R/Members
I want to know whether against a order of acquittal of magistrate in a gambling case in which maximum sentence is provided maximum one month or maximum 50/- rs. fine,appeal/revision by prosecution is maintainable or not.plz suggest. Thanx
Ranganath
17 February 2010 at 21:48
Ld counsels,
In a criminal case will the accused be examined at any point by any of the counsel (both prosectuion / Defense).
Is the exmination done under section 313 CrPC a thorough test of facts on accused or a brief accept/deny question. Will accused be asked to explain specific facts arising out of the witnesses.
Please clarify.
Thanks
pkm
17 February 2010 at 20:56
zyZ Company wind up as per the order of high court.Official liquidator appointed. The necessary legal consequence was discharge of all the employees and officers from the services of the company including the Board of Directors. Xyz company before wind up has filled case against a EFG company under N.i.act.What will be the legal status of the case filled by XYZ company :
1. Who will pursue the case viz Ex board of Director or Official liquidator
2.If ex board of director, in what capacity.
If EFg company is also wind up , whether such type of provision are covered under N.I.act/ companies act
yogesh bawiskar
17 February 2010 at 20:28
In the absence of original notarised document, whether a xerox copy of such document can be used as a secondary evidence in N.I. Act as a proof of consideration? and if yes ? how?
Anonymous
17 February 2010 at 20:26
In the absence of original notarised document, whether a xerox copy of such document can be used as a secondary evidence in N.I. Act as a proof of consideration? and if yes ? how?
Sujit J Pathak
17 February 2010 at 18:29
I am in need of urgen advise form all Ld Experts in my case, I am praticing advocate having 2 years experience. I am appearing for accused in case u/s 138 of N.I Act before Magistrate court Dadar Mumbai, On 11th Feb my maater was kept for futher cross of the complainant but due to ill health i couldn't attend court and magistrate rejected adjournment application filed by accused and even closed the evidence. Now the matter is for recording statement of accused but i want to cross examine, Is there any way to re open the evidence. Thanks and regards Adv Sujit Pathak
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
section 125
hello,
I need to know any authority on the following facts.........
That that husband has been directed to pay maintanance to her wife and revision hasbeen filed against the said order.
The point i would like to know is that one witness was examined in defence of husband's case and his examination in chief was recorded but the cross was deferred as court timewas over.On next date the presiding officer was on leave and on next date an application was moved for adjournment as the said witness was not present but the said application was rejected and the court passed the order and as such the testimony of this witness was left out of consideration.
The point i would i like to know whether the matter can be remanded in these set of circumstances and is there any authority in this regard.