Anonymous
11 September 2010 at 15:52
A case has been filed against me under section 67 of I &T Act.I had allegedly opened an a/c styled as litalidas@yahoo.co.in .My wife e-mail id is litali_das@yahoo.co.in. Some obscene materials were sent from litalidas@yahoo.co.in to one emailid whose identity is unknown.My wife alleged that she came to know of the ID from browsing history and she downloaded the obscene items and transmitted to litali_das@yahoo.co.in.She claimed that her reputation has been damaged and fileda case under section 67 of IT ACT. Police claims that they have evidence that the e-mail ID has been opened by me as it was opened from my house and accessed from different places where I had visited.
Some issues
How did she know the password?
Can the ID said to impersonate her even if the address/age does not match?
As the email was sent to only one ID can she claim to be affected party?
Is it a bailable offence?Can I go to the PS and get the bail?
In case I have to seek an anticipatory bail, can I move to a lower court or go to High Court?
Anonymous
11 September 2010 at 15:15
my brother in law has extramarital affairs with a girl my sister is very upset about this so she want to move a divorce petiton but before that we want to punish both my brother in law and his lady legally ...what should we do please suggest
Anonymous
11 September 2010 at 15:11
in the influence of modern movies my two neighbours childrens involved into physical relation ship (boy 16 years, girl 14 yrs)when the parents of the girl came to know about this they went to the police and the boy was arrested and was booked for raping a minor girl..
though the boy was released on bail and the case has been not began in court what do the law says in these matter where both girl and boy were minor and they on their own consent keept the physical relationship.
Anonymous
11 September 2010 at 15:04
making physical relationship with a mature girl by promissing her for marriage will amount to rape or some other section will be attracted.
Anonymous
11 September 2010 at 14:05
my 62 year old neighbour was arrested under 279 IPC and was immidiately he was produced before the judicial Magistrate First Class.my neighbour was not told that the charges were bailable so he may produce surety. when we know about the arrest and move bail petiton with surety the magistrate told us that he had already sent the accused on three days remand so untill three days passes he wont be released and on request he agreed to release my neighbour on the next day but not on the same day as he told that the remand canot be cancelled on the same day.
is it true that remand canot be invoked the same day and what can we do now against the magistrate
Anonymous
11 September 2010 at 12:12
Hi Group,
Can you assist me? My wife and her family has falsely made a FIR U/S 498A, 323, 3/4DP act. In that she has mentioned a big amount of money which has been shown to be given to my family as a dowry. But she is absolutely telling a lie. My marriage was a simple marriage. Is there any way to ask for the authenticity of the amount shown as the dowry from the IT Dept .
Anonymous
11 September 2010 at 12:05
An FIR has been filed under Section 67 of Information & Technology Act.Is it a bailable offence?
artabandhu
11 September 2010 at 10:49
is 437'A'cr.p.c is applicable in a comprised case.
Satya Mani Tiwari
11 September 2010 at 10:46
My query is regarding rating I have registered as an expert in LAWERSCLUBINDIA forum.I am regularly replying to the queries on daily digest basis I have earned 73 points,my name not in the list hall of fame where as the experts who have less points then me have a name in hall of fame.Some experts even have 0 points even then they are on the list
Please reply how one is rated as an expert
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
complaint before magistrate u/s 200 cr p c
bank officer made complaint before magistrate u/s 200 cr p c. there after magistrate forwarded the complaint u/s 202 cr p c and directed to register the case and investigate the case by sho/si of the concerned police station.the police registered the FIR by Sub Inspector of police.there after Inspector of police arrested the some accused persons with out arrest warrant and surrender the accused persons before magistrate.magistrate remanded the accused persons with out asking any thing.after 12 days accused persons are released on bail.the charge sheet was filed by the inspector of police showing the above arrested persons as accused and the remainin persons released from accused and converted as witnessess.
so, i want to clarify point vide answers sir,
1. agreement contains to clause" any disputes araising this contract exclusively hyderabad courts only"
2. the above witnessess are not under the jurisdection of the inspector of police.
3. inspector of police was not taken any permission for the higher officials to investgate the case apart from his limits.
4. bankers was not filed any complaint before the SHO before filing the case and not expressed that they have filed the complaint before SHO and the same was rejected by SHO or higher police officials.
5. am i right taht,202 cr p c comes under CHAPTER XV and follow the chapter xv BY THE POLICE AND THE MAGISTRATE ALSO.
6. BANKERS FILED THE CASE other than the hyderabad jurisdiction.
7. one accused was arrested 6 days back and submitted the person before the magistrate after 6th by showing the person was arrested on the 6th day morning.
so, i request your good selves do the needful and give me the judgements in the favour.
yours truly,
j.venkateswara rao
cell. 91-9440249958
jvrao_tinku@rediffmail.com