LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Om Prakash Dhusia   20 December 2010 at 06:37

Complaint against the defence lawyer

Sir, if due to ineptness, carelessness and lethrgic approach towards a criminal case at Sessions Court led to the conviction and it was observed that the defence lawyer found wandering for simple logics, can he be brought to book in lawyer's bar association and where can the victim approach if the case was at Lucknow and the lawyer normaly practice at Kanpur?

Om Prakash Dhusia   20 December 2010 at 06:29

Carbon copy of statement of PW as Evidence

Dear Sir, someone suggested that ofcourse judge can use the carbon copy statement of PW for conviction of the accused,whereas the original found missing and its whereabouts are not known so far.Then what does section 65 of Indian Evidence Act 1872 stand for? Is this act only for the general public and not for the judges who are duty bound to safeguard the society for any wrongdoings but they themselves are allowed to forgo those acts and commit blunders?
Kindly shed light on this.

Om Prakash Dhusia   20 December 2010 at 06:19

F.I.R

Dear Sirs,is F.I.R a statement u/s 161 CrPC?
2)Is F.I.R. from the third party for an offence u/s 307 IPC against the person who was abducted, can be used as evidence against the abductors in another court?
3)Can,criminal complaint in another court by mother of abducted against the abductors on enemity about money lending can be used as evidence against the abductors whilst the case has been thrown by that court on Non-appearnace of mother, the complainant in that court?
If need be I can submit the whole story.
Kindly reply.

JAIME   20 December 2010 at 01:13

FRAMING OF CHARGE IN CRIMINAL CASE

THE ACCUSED IS CHARGE SHEETED U/S 465, 467,468,471,419 AND 420 OF IPC, BEFORE JMFC. THE APP IS THE WIFE OF THE LAWYER DEFENDING THE ACCUSED. IN SUCH A CASE IS THERE ANYTHING I CAN DO TO PREVENT INADEQUAT OR INAPPROPRIATE CHARGES BEING FRAMED DEFEATING THE CAUSE OF JUSTICE?

Anonymous   19 December 2010 at 22:08

Public documents

Sir,
It is requested to inform that in case of trial under criminal law.

i. Whether fax copy is a admissible evidence? if so, as a public document?(the correspondence is between two govt departments)?
ii. Whether internal correspondence between the Customs and Central Excise Departments is a public documents?
Thank You,

JAIME   19 December 2010 at 21:45

CHARGE SHEET FILED BEFOR JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS

UPON MY COMPLAINT AGAINST IMPERSONATION, CHEATING AND FORGERY THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR & SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE FILED A POLICE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE PERSON PROCESSING A LAND CONVERSION SANAD IN HIS OFFICE. THE POLICE AFTER INVESTIGATION FILED THE CHARGE SHEET ON 14/06/2010 AND CASE NO. 181/S/10/A IS REGISTERED IN COURT OF JMFC. THOUGH I WAS INFORMED THAT NOTICE WOULD BE ISSUED IN AUGUST, WE THE WITNESSES AND INFORMANTS HAVE STILL NOT BEEN INTIMATED OF ANY HEARING TILL DATE. IS THERE ANYTHING WE CAN DO TO START THIS CASE?

artabandhu   19 December 2010 at 17:44

NI ACT

The cheque was issued by the secretary of a education institution.and the ceque was returned due to in sufficient balance.then is it required to mention the name of the secretary while i presenting the complaint petition before any court of law .

Anonymous   19 December 2010 at 16:55

about N.I ACT 138

DEAR SIR ONE OF MY FRIEND HAS A POST DATED CHEQUE (DATE- 10.04.10) HAS TAKEM ME AND HE PLACE THAT CHEQE ON 31.06.2010 AFTER THAT I PAID HIS FULL AMMOUNT ON 26.07.2010 BUT HE HAS NOT RETURN THAT CHEQUE TO ME. AND HE ASKING MORE AMOUNT FRM ME , SOME OTHERS WAY I FIND THAT HE DID A CASE UNDER NI ACT138 ON 06.06.2010, BUT TILL 19.12.2010 I DID'NT GET ANY SUMMONN OR NOICE FROM HIM/COURT. WHAT SHOULD I DO ? I HAVE A SIMPALE CASH RECIVE OF RS 105000/- WHICH I HAD PAY TO HIM WITH INTREST ON 26.06.2010.

aslam   19 December 2010 at 14:44

depostions cediblity

respected experts

In my case prosecution witness was giving a depostion in the court and other witness was sitting in the court room when depostion was going on. After that turn comes for other witness to depostion in same case. That time question is arising that first witness deposition is not credible beacuse of other witness was sitting in the court room when depositon was going of first witness in same case.
so how is effect in this point in my case and any ciation for that crediblity of witness?
pls urgent

Anonymous   19 December 2010 at 14:29

n i act section 138

if The judgement will against accused from metropolitan court then accused wants to go for an appeal so what is the procedure of appeal.

for Example :

cheque amount is 5.0 lakhs ruppes.