MohammedRaffiq Bijapur
28 December 2010 at 21:32
I want to know whether a Muslim widowed can claim maintenance against her father-in-law under Sec-125 of CrPC.
MohammedRaffiq Bijapur
28 December 2010 at 21:29
I want to know whether a Muslim widowed can claim maintenance against her father-in-law under Sec-125 of CrPC.
MohammedRaffiq Bijapur
28 December 2010 at 21:25
I want to know whether a Muslim widowed can claim maintenance against her father-in-law under Sec-125 of CrPC.
Member (Account Deleted)
28 December 2010 at 20:43
Can judgment of a civil case have any binding over a criminal case in high court, as per law?
If such finding is produced before court, will us get an opportunity to counter the same?
Anonymous
28 December 2010 at 19:30
After seven days of love marriage arrange by parents son threaten parents to book under dowery act. parents of bride were very rude all the time during ceremony,this was the complaint of mother.Reaction came in sms by son.
can u tell how to protect parents?
Kartik dhar
28 December 2010 at 14:27
Hello Xperts!
I am going through a divorce. She has not filed any Divorce Petition yet. But she has kept my daughter and my pet dog. She wants me to give her divorce and leave her and carry on with my life.
I have no place to stay and accommodate my parents as the house was gifted orally to me by my wife's mother. She is now asking me to vacate the house, she has also taken away my Maruti Swift car by fooling me. Though the car is owned by her.
In return when I asked for the compensation she has given me a cheque of Rs. 95 Lakhs against mutual settlement for Divorce.
I am sure this cheque will bounce and she will deny the alligations further.
1. What are my options to file a case u/s 138 of NI Act.
2. Or what am I supposed to do?
Please advise appropriately...
Much appreciated!!
Anonymous
28 December 2010 at 13:49
After charge sheet was filed u/s 420/467/468, Accussed noticed from case/diary submitted by the police alongwith Charge sheet that I.O. has not included his documents provided to him in support of his innocence in the case, rather enclosed the documents which were provided by the complainant with forged signature of the accussed. I.O. even not confirmed from any source the genuiness of the documents provided by the complainant. Whether accussed can appeal to re-investigation OR FURTHER INVESTIGATION of the case either to court or to higher police authorities or to any other agency because evidences submitted by accussed to I.O. were not included by I.O. and the I.O. included the forged documents with acussed forged signature.
Anonymous
28 December 2010 at 13:24
what will happen if a person do not appear before the court after receiving a summon for a cheque bounce case
santosh
28 December 2010 at 13:16
Dear expert ,
goods were supplied for amount of Rs. 50,00,000/- (fifty thousand) accused paid from time to time 45,00,000/- in cheque but his nine cheque amounting to Rs. 5,00,000/- were bounced, (stopped payment by the drawer) now the examination of P.W. No. 1 is over, P.W. No. 2 (the broker is over) the broker evidenced that the goods were delivered and sold through him to the accused. And he has noted in his brokage receipt the trucks nos. and the name of the transporter through whom the said goods were delivered. After when we called P.W. No. 3 the transporter he turn hostile, we asked him whether he knows the accused he denied by name, when we shows the same accused in the court he identify him, he evidenced that the said original register is not traceable in his office ( from the period between 25.02.2010 to 06.06. 2010, the period the goods were send to the accused) the also admitted that there is no due (transport charge) between the period 25.02.2010 to 06.06.2010 of the accused ) the transporter also admitted that there was no such complaint by his drivers that the goods between 25.02.2010 to 06.06.2010 were not delivered to the parties. However originals records are with (p. w. no. 4 ) who has recorded the trucks nos. weight of goods , and the period between the goods were loaded into the transporter trucks. The defense advocate decline to cross. till now it is not a case of the defence that the cheque was given for security purpose, whether the cheque has been stolen
Pl. guide me how the evidenced given by the transporter will affect my case.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
obscene phone calls
how much time v can take for lodging FIR against any obscene or threatning telephinic calls whether v need to record the conversation using voice recorder or not