Anonymous
25 February 2011 at 14:55
What are rules regarding providing class "A" to any under-trial.
Anonymous
25 February 2011 at 14:54
What are rules regarding providing class "B" to any under-trial.
vinay
25 February 2011 at 14:23
my wife got expired after 9 months of marriage on 30/08/10. all rituals were done only in presence of her natural parents. they did not objected any where that time. nor they blamed us that time for anything. even they dint asked for postmortem. just her eyes were donated.
but then after 10 days they wrote a letter of 10 pages to society blaming that we killed their daughter. they asked society in written for taking some action against my family. some of the office bearers of society being relatives of my in-laws took their side and asked us on verbal basis to return jewellery to them. though my in-laws have not done legal complaint or complication for us till now(feb,11). Even society did a meeting on 5/10/10 regarding this. In that meeting my wife's uncle asked society to take jewelleries of neha from us stating that when she is no more in this world, why should we keep her symbols. it must be used in any social welfare. he accepted in meeting that they wrote that letter by mistake but he is not ready to accept that in writing.
We are chasing society from that time continuosly for the result of meeting through registered with ad letters. but even they are not giving any written consent. They are just asking us to forget everything that happened. Now they are saying on verbal basis that THIS IS YOUR FAMILIAR ISSUE. WHAT SOCIETY CAN SAY ON THIS?? Even they have sent a letter on this issue to the national body of our society.
Can i suit a case of defamation against my inlaws?? Is there any time limit to complaint for defamation?? do society will be also effected if i suit a case of defamation against my inlaws?
Rajesh Khattar
25 February 2011 at 08:54
Dear Sir,
I am presenting my case in detail.And this is my request to all the Expert please guide us.
My Nephew aged 17 years met with an accident with speeding Swift Car on 13th Jan. 2011 and that was the Head on Collision. My Nephew was on Activa Scooter ( with out Gear ) . He was seriously injured and admitted to Hospital. My Nephew was having proper License, whereas the Driver of the Car didn’t have the License but his car was insured. Police imposed IPC 279, 338 and 427 at that time.. My Nephew was put on Ventilator and after 5 days Ventilator removed and from 20th Jan he started recovering. But at that time he was on Liquid diet but on 23rd Jan. Hospital Staff ‘s negligence they gave him Solid food that struck into his wind pipe and he died. Hospital showed “ FAT AMBOLISM “ in Death summary. After our Protest , Police sent the Organ to PGI Rohtak and Madhuban for further Investigation and imposed another IPC 304A. The Post Mortem report is still awaited. Hospital did not provide us any Report ( i.e. CT Scans/Examination Report), Even Hospital Doctors don’t want to meet us to tell the reason of Death.
My Questions are :
1. Are these IPCs are sufficient.
2. Owner of the Car and Driver of the Car will be punished or not if so then for how many years.
3. What can we do against the Hospital for their negligence.
4. My Nephew was the only son of my Brother and his everything was dependent upon him. How much we can claim for this case.
I request to all the Experts to please guide us .
Regards
Rajesh Khattar
Faridabad
Prashanth Reddy
24 February 2011 at 23:51
Hi,
i filed a petition on behalf of the complainant in the court to assit the prosecution in a Sessions Case. one of the culprit name in this case was not added.
please let me know how add that said culprit name in the charge sheet to prosecute?
Looking forward to hear from the experts, atleast I will try to do justice to the complainant family. as the complaint was expired after giving the Dying Declaration to the magistrate in the hospital, but she was told in the DD stating the sisters.
but the Police was added only one sister name in the Chargesheet. I do not want to leave other sister(culprit).
Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 20:24
Respected sir/Madam,
In continuation of my last query regarding mediation.
if the case proceeds for longer period and finally applicant wont be able to prove even a single point what she has mentioned in her main application
In such sequences at last if she says that she wanted to stay with her husband but on the otherhand due to the case and mental and physical problem which is purposely provided by her to the husband husband refused to stay with her then....
court's role will be negative or positive for such husband.
and what one husband suppose to do when wife purposely endanger the lives of the matrimonial family?
is court consider the facts ore mere women law?
these questions are genuine as far as juditial system is concern because if today it is DV case just to supress the matrimonial family it may tommorow a 498a case can threat and destroy many lives.
thank you
Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 18:20
Respected sir/Madam,
Can Court deny for mediation if respondents demands to settle the matter?
if proper reason provided to the court for mediation but Applicant deny in such circumstances can respondent demand of certified copy of her denial?
case of dv is not forwarding from past one year and the only earner of the respondent family has lost his job due to mental stress and hypertension .
from the begining of this case he is telling to the court that he wanted to stay with the applicant but she is not staying only and mere demand of money from her side but courrt is not giving attention on his words.
what to do in such situation ?
if trial court denies can we appeal in high court for mediation ?
Biraj
24 February 2011 at 18:00
I have a friend who was charged under sections 420/406/34 three years ago after FIR;s were registered in three police stations against her finance company. The company had been operating for two years and had been honoring all its instruments and was making payments till the time of the FIR. The company is registered and the FIR was based on a rumor but the police seized the offices and factories of the company and froze all bank accounts as well as her personal account and took out arrest warrants for the MD, who was outside the country on a business deal. After knowing the case she came back and surrendered to the police after 2 months and was remanded to custody for 5 (FIVE) months. Till the time of her bail no charge sheet had been filed by any of the three police station.
After almost 3 years nothing has happened and have learned that one of the police stations has yet to file charge sheet. The comapny has been closed all this while and evrything in the factories is rotting.
Please advice what can be done now as it has become clear that the rumors had been spread by an influential politician and none of the depositors have any complaints and are willing to go on record. In one instance the 4 signatories to the FIR in one station have a total deposit of 13,000/- only when the company has satisfied clients who have invested in crores. What are our options now? Should she approch HC to squash the FIR? Is it true that there is a ruling by Punjab HC that 420 ans 406 cannot be used together?
Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 16:53
Dear Members
I read section 417-cheating then what about 420-whether it is for cheating for other.
sessions division.
7. Territorial divisions.
(1) Every State shall be a sessions division or shall consist of sessions divisions; and every sessions division shall, for the purposes of this Code, be a district or consist of districts.
Provided that every metropolitan area shall, for the said purposes, be a separate sessions division and district.
(2) The State Government may, after consultation with the High Court, alter the limits or the number of such divisions and districts.
(3) The State Government may, after consultation with the High Court, divide any district into sub-divisions and may alter the limits or the number of such sub-divisions.
(4) The session's divisions, districts and sub-divisions existing in a State at the commencement of this Code, shall be deemed to have been formed under this section.
Query : What does the section want to convey in detail pls becasue i am totally confused.
Also What do u mean by executive magistrate ? What are the powers they have ? & among the magistrate who is the superior magistrate in chronological vice pls elebroate in detail if possible with the rights they have & their duties ?
Thanks In Advance.
God Bless u All.