Arvind Singh Chauhan
15 March 2011 at 21:33
I have sent summons to opposite party in DV Act 5 times but these remain unversed. Even delhi police remain unturned. what other methods may be adopted for proper service in DV Act.
Anonymous
15 March 2011 at 18:13
If Addl.CP Crime ordered to DCP to investigate the case through senior officer before one year and still DCP can not order to Investigate the case to any officer and I know about that now through RTI when I recd that order letter. What can I do? Can I get report through RTI from DCP regarding from whom,when the investigation is done? bcoz house robbery is done before 1.8 yr.
Request to suggest.
Baljit
15 March 2011 at 18:11
1. What sections of CPC will apply to a person if he/she knowingly commits a fraud and obtains documents related to a property by fraudulent means i.e. by falsely stating the facts.
2. What happens if the same person goes to the court and knowingly submits the same papers obtained frauulently, in front of a judge in a court. Can the judge send him to jail, if yes again what sections of CPC will apply to him.
3. What is the procedure for filing a police report (F.I.R) in Delhi against such crime as it has happened to us and how can we file a police report and what sections of criminal code will be applied..
shailesh shah
15 March 2011 at 17:42
If F.I.R. is registered under IPC 454, 457 & 380 who should be appointed for investigation from Police Dept. if the burglary loss value is Rs. 50 Lac or above. Is it possible to get standard guidelines on appointing person for investigation
Anonymous
15 March 2011 at 17:31
I was in a relationship with a guy. I recently broke up with him. He has a few of my pictures, my text messages and a few voice recordings of when we had had phone s*x. He is blackmailing to publish it online if I don't succumb to his demands; which of course include getting intimate with him. I do not know what to do... Pls advice!!!
wifebetrayed
15 March 2011 at 05:44
any time limit for police to file challan basis FIR. If police does not file challan what happen to FIR Status
Anonymous
14 March 2011 at 20:20
Whether any of the states governments issued any notification to establish special courts following the provisions of The protection of Child rights Act 2005
imteyaz farooquee
14 March 2011 at 19:03
Dear experts,
Kindly express your detail of Bovine Animal (protection & smuggling) Act and also send link to see the act on net.
sushil bhatt
14 March 2011 at 17:27
CB-CID has sent a notice u/s 160 of CR. PC to all Directors of the Company for appearance and give statement before it in respect of a FIR registered by the state Government against some of its officials for embazalment/misappropriation of govt. funds.
The Company is a contractor of that state government.
My query is whether this notice u/s 160 of CR.PC can be quashed by the High Court upon motion of the company.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Very very Urgent Supreme court matter fixed for 16/3/11
r/mEMBERS
six persons were tried in trial court,one was convicted us 302 ipc and rest were acquitted ,later on Highcourt convicted all six accused persons uss 302 read with 149 ipc,one accused who was held guilty by trial court and highcourt preffered a SL:P Crl before Supreme Court which was dismissed at admission stage.Other five persons also preferred an crl appeal under enlargement of supreme court jurisdiction (As a matter of right bcoz they were acquitted by trial court and were held guilty by highcourt.Now this crl appeal is pending in supreme court and arguments are going on,appellant counsel as well as court also intends to decide case of the accused whose SLP was dismissed earlier ,with this pending appeal,in other words we wants to reopen the case of the accused whose SLP was dismissed earlier,because if court acquit all these five accused than there is a legal problem that conviction of the alone accused whose SLP was dismissed earlier us 302/149 ipc is not sustainable.Kindly suggest any provision or citation for reopening the case of the accused whose SLP was dismissed earlier .Thanks