KAPIL
22 April 2011 at 17:42
Sir,
Someone person has filed suit upon me with a debt liability of Rs.2lac against cash loan. Whereas I have not received any cash amount from nor signed agreement. He is misusing my old blank cheque.
KAPIL
22 April 2011 at 16:53
Sir,
I was given a blank cheque to him as token money against property in 1995, i said him that the same cheque will be encashed only if makes agreement with me in written. But he did not made any agreement with me nor return cheque to me. I had number of time visited in his office with my wife, he did not given back my cheque. In June 2005, Bank Closed my account without intimation due to not maintaining minimum balance. In 2009 he presented the same cheque into bank, the bank return the cheque to party with remarks "insufficent fund". Now he has filed suit upon me with the demanding Rs.2Lac under section 138. He is saying that he has given cash loan to me against the same cheque. Please suggest me
Anonymous
22 April 2011 at 15:30
A cheated B by a false document in 2001.now B understood this .can B file a criminal case against A? in 2011, is there any limitation to criminal case?
Ajay Parashar
22 April 2011 at 10:56
Dear Sirs
I have been doing a partnership business with two more partners. The account operation of bank is to be done any two partners. It was a trend that one partner going out of station signed the cheques and give to another for making necessary payments for smooth running of business. In this trend, I also give some cheques to my partners after signing but they misuse the same after some dispute, by filling the name of their close aids and file the court cases u/s 138, they are also party with me but their advocate is different from mine. I don't know the beneficiary of those cheques never done a business dealing and they can not prove the liability towards those cheques. What is the remedy for me?
Tapash
22 April 2011 at 10:53
are there guidelines framed by the Various High Court or Supreme Court to grant or refuse bail in such cases?
Anonymous
22 April 2011 at 07:38
I want to prefer an appeal to Supreme court. cheque bounce second appeal against acquittal.
Can anybody suggest me an advocate AOR.
I am ready to pay the fees as per the standards of the Supreme court middle class legal aid center.
sitaram satapathy
21 April 2011 at 23:40
What is the law regarding limitation for cognizance magistrate to allow accused on police remand
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 20:49
Demand notice sent through Regd. Post with A/D and the same was returned with Postal Endorsement " Not Known ".
Is the endorsement "Not Known " a good service ?
I am for the accused ... I need few citations to prove that Not Known is not at all a good service.
........... Could you help me out of this problem ?
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 17:56
Sir,
i would like to know whether bail is possible in a case where the prosecutrix has not taken the name of the accused petitioners in the FIR but has taken the names of accused petitioners in sec 161 and she has not given her statement in sec 164 where almost 2 months have been passed since the offence. moreover the injury report is not suggesting any offence against her. Fsl has also not been done.
the accused petitioners are in J.C.
now after 4 to 5 hearings prosecutrix has taken the names of the accused petitioners in 164 but at some other time as she mentioned in FIR , she is changing her statement time,
whether in these new circumstances defence can take these things for getting bail
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
bail
can a jmfc give a bail to a person arrested under session triable case..eg.302 IPC