LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

amarnathdhamayanthi   28 August 2011 at 13:05

Sec 133 of crpc for rdo report

i already ask query for property return from police officers in sec 133 of crpc, i had received answers to file petition before rdo, now i have one doubt in said answers i.e., whether i have to file a petition completion of rdo enquiry or at any time even pendency of the rdo enquiry?

Anonymous   28 August 2011 at 12:56

Hostile witness

wheather a witness who has been declared hostile and after that in crossexamination public prosecuter contradict him from his previous statement and that witness supports p p than wheather this evidence will be read against accused or not please give answer with citations if available

Anonymous   28 August 2011 at 12:49

Mimimum judicial custody required in 420 465 467 468 471 120b

Can anybody tell me the minimum judicial custody required in the above mention offence when allegation against the person is that he is only employee of the company against which case is register

amarnathdhamayanthi   28 August 2011 at 12:35

Former pm rajiv case

respected all experts,in former pm rajiv gandhi's assassination case our supreme court had passed capital punishment for accused in the names of perarivalan, murugan, santhan. The above said accused are filed the mercy petition before our president and the same was rejected and their punishment execution date also announced, in this circumstances some political and public organisations agitate our supreme court judgement. this doings are correct or wrong.......

amarnath from tamilnadu

Anonymous   28 August 2011 at 12:20

Demand of maintenance rs.1500/- per month is mandatory

Demand of maintenance Rs.1500/- per month is mandatory please discuss with case law

Anonymous   28 August 2011 at 08:49

Cross examination

Sir
Whether the abuses and other conversation made in public by the complainant , which were recorded with the help of a tape recorder by the opposite party , can be played during the cross examination of the complainant in a criminal trial before the court? What is the procedure of it and whether it is of any evidentiary value in view of the fact that complainant has alleged in his complaint that opposite party used to abuse him and his family? matter is relating to 323 IPC. Pl advice

kuldeep kumar   28 August 2011 at 05:50

Murder

causing death which wud amount cul nt amt2 murder but in fact caused death of child in womb.causing death which wud amt2 murder.is there punishment for murder in last case or punishment for cul nt ant 2 mur.

Ashish   28 August 2011 at 00:33

Hello

hello,
i want to know what are the job opportunities for a cyber lawyer in India...i mean i am a fresher...please guide me??

Anonymous   28 August 2011 at 00:27

Related 156(3) cr.p.c.

Res Sir,

Can revision/ Appeal lie when any judicial magistrate dismissed the application of 156(3) Cr. P.C. for lodging the FIR

Is any citations of Supreme Court:
Thanks

james   27 August 2011 at 22:04

Evidence act section 66

As per the evidence act sec.66 notice is necessery to mark a photostat copy in a trial..In which manner the notice to be given to opposit party or persons in possession of document?
Can it be filed before the court for sending the same to concerned paries or directly to be given without the involvment of court?