Anonymous
10 September 2011 at 09:44
SIR,
WHEN IT IS CLEARLY MENTIONED IN THE FIR THE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS HAVE ESCAPED FROM THE CRIME SCENE AFTER COMMISSION OF OFFENCE. INSPITE OF TELLING ORALLY ABOUT THE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS THEY ARE NOT ARRESTING THE CULPRITS NOR ANY ENQUIRY IS MADE. I AM NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY THEY ARE NOT ARRESTING WHEN THE CHARGE IS UNDER SECTION 307 CR.P.C.
PLEASE ADVISE ME I WILL BE GRATEFUL FOR THIS.
THANKING YOU
Anonymous
10 September 2011 at 08:00
Is the loan letter/loan sanction letter given by bank is VALUABLE Security.Loan is not actually disbursed.
kuldeep kumar
10 September 2011 at 07:28
i need recent maintenance crpc 125 case law..if not available to members then pls provide me site names one or more..thanks
Adv. Virendra
09 September 2011 at 22:06
In 2 counter cases that are due for judgement, the judge instists that all the accused must be present at the time of pronouncing judgement. Which becomes impossible as the number of accused is too many.
What is the exact postition, is there any relevant case law ( I tried to find but failed to)
Anonymous
09 September 2011 at 21:52
Sir,
A cheque dishonour case is numbered as calender case (CC) and the complainant side evidence was over. Now, without going for sec 313 crpc questioning, the case posted directly to defence side evidence. whether it can be done for a case proceeding as warrant case. I am the defendce side counsel. Can u help with citation, if possible. Thank u.
Uma Roy
09 September 2011 at 21:04
I am a 59 years old housewife. My husband has filed several criminal & civil cases against a well known Builder on charges of cheating etc. To coerce my husband to withdraw the said cases the Builder started violating my privacy & confidentiality by hacking my private financial records whereupon I filed a case against them u/s.471/465/468/506/120B IPC, u/s 72 of the Information Technology Act 2000 and u/s.66A/66B/66C/72A of the Information Technology (Amended) Act 2008. After investigation for over 1 year the Police have filed a Final Report stating that "“Therefore they (the accused persons) are liable for prosecution u/s. 72/72A I.T Act. Sufficient evidences u/s.465/468/506/120B IPC and 66A, 66B, 66C IT Act has been well established against them” However,the Dy.S.P has commented that "Although the offences were committed but the notification of the amended act took place after the time of occurrence of the offence and other sections of I.P. could not be implemented or effective. Hence I.O submitted F.R as mistake of law”. What exactly is the meaning of mistake in law and what recourse do I have now?
Anonymous
09 September 2011 at 20:16
can a complaint under sec138 of ni act and arbitration award decree proceed concurrently in different courts
Anonymous
09 September 2011 at 19:07
my wife died with in 6 months for the date of our marriage. my father-in-law logged a complaint against our family that my family along with me has harrased my wife for dowry.police registered case under ipc 304b.but the fact is my wife lost her pregnency before the day she died.she was in depression.when the incedent took place i was attending an interview and my parents went on their work. all the facts r known by my father-in-law as he used to visit our house weekly once. he has come for compromise also.but another son-in-law is against the compromise. the thing is i am also not ready for compromise.as let the facts b reveled by themselves in the court.i and my family members r ready transfering this case to cid.
now,the thing is...
one of the senior advocate says that though there r witnesses in favour of us the session court will b afraid in giving acquital in this case.so he asks us to get compromise.
but,i am not ready for any such compromise.
let my case b an lesson for those who misuses this section ipc 304b.
is it true that session courts fear in giving acquital in this type of cases.
we r ready for any type of investigation.but the thing is the fact should b revealed by the complainants itself.
plz help me in this matter.
Anonymous
09 September 2011 at 18:34
Dear All,
Just wanted to check out the following:
Recently someone told us that there was a stay(or overrule) put on Justice SN Dhingra's judgement for 145(2)(Rajesh agarwal and ors a few months back.
Any update someone can provide? Wanted to check out if its true.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
N i act 138
I had given blank 120 cheques only signed and body of cheque like date amount drawee was left blank.
Now that blank cheque bank using to bounce and filing cases on me
cheques are from same bank same branch producing in same branch.
how to escape?
here before in one case from same matter i had prooved to court that bank had taken blank cheqes from me.