Anonymous
23 September 2011 at 16:23
My financial position is not good to submit the writ in the high court. Its possible that court can arrange the advocate for me? if yes what is the procedure to do that?
Anonymous
23 September 2011 at 12:58
Hi , I just want to know that if someone committed a crime under the above mention section 10 yrs ago but the complainant get now.
he is arrested by police man and now in MCR.
i just want to ask u, should dis person get a bell in this case
Anonymous
23 September 2011 at 12:52
Hi , I just want to know that if someone committed a crime under the above mention section 10 yrs ago but the complainant get now.
he is arrested by police man and now in MCR.
i just want to ask u, should dis person get a bell in this case
Anonymous
23 September 2011 at 11:17
---------------------------------------------
Hi I am raghavendra,
Got Married in 2010 feb, i wife had an different affire, so she was forced by her parents to marry me,
she run away from my house in chennai, after that she do not want to come back now her parents also do not want to send here back,
initiallly they were asking for more time to send here back, after 5 to 6 months they put a case against me for domenstic voilance, in that they asked for out side settlement, for divorce, and when i refused for direce and tryed to prove i am inocence, they have pput 498a on me and my parents and sister after 13 months she ran away, she stayed with us for only 9 days. still police have not put charge sheet. i already tried for qusha in high court karnataka, but failed to get the stay, judge is telling let police finish there enquiry and put a chage sheet.
this is pury for the money they are doing this i was getting some threathening callls also, i recodede them and produce in the court where domenstic volance case is running.
i betwwen i came to know that her marrige is fixed some where else, not with her lover but some body else
who is also a divorce guy. the girl to whom i got married is not a good girl, and she lost her virginity also before the marrige to me.
they are in very urgent need of divorce, but putting more pressure on me,
what i can do to avoide them, with out giving the money.
since they are in hurry they are not touching the monthly maintance also,
since i will appeal in some other court and the domenstic voilance case stops.
some of the advocate suggested me to file a divoce in chennai where i am working and she is for chickamagalore, when they sart roaming to the court they will come for settelment.
can i take back the divorce case once filled.
Anonymous
23 September 2011 at 08:58
hello advocates
i just want to ask from u that is there any procedure or ruling in which son is liable to pay in case father who give the cheque is died under sec138 ni act
prashant pundhir
23 September 2011 at 05:33
Dear experts,
One of my application of 156(3) dismissed by the magistrate holding that the matter is of civil nature and not supported with affidavit .I need some rulings of supreme court and high courts(better of high court of allahabad) that affidavit is not mandatory with the application of 156(3)cr.p.c.
Thanks .
Swetambara Purohit
23 September 2011 at 00:47
In a compliant case,complaint was filed alleging commission of offence u/s 323,341,294,354,506 IPC and 3(i)(x) of SC ST (PA) Act.bt the court after the 202(Cr.P.C.) statement,framed charge under section341,323,294,354,506 IPC only and not under SC ST(PA) Act.But at the hearing stage the witnesses for the first time speak about the offence related to SC ST Act.After that the complainant filed a petition before the court to transfer the case to the Special Judge court as regards to the offence.Can This be possible n Can Sec.323 Cr.P.C. be applicable here???If yes then why??and if No then Why???
Anonymous
22 September 2011 at 19:48
sir,
bail able warrant have been issued against me under negotiable instrument act (138) in a conspirated case of Rupees. 10 lakh.
Earlier we have duely replied the opposit party's council notice. I was out of station with my family for long time i did nt get any summon may be in our absence they visited, but the court admitted it serviced and in our non appearence to the date court issued bailable warrant.
kindly let me know what should i do now the next date is january 2012.
Anonymous
22 September 2011 at 19:48
sir, i'm presenting my query through following example case:-
in a dictonary (or any other products), on its PREFACE( i.e. in 2nd page), the manufacturer SPECIFICALLY mention that:-
NORMAL RATE/UNIT-Rs1195.
Incase of bulk purchases (eg:- 40 units & above) Rs 896.25/unit.
BUT on two pages later (i.e. in 5th page),
he JUST GIVEN- "RS 597.5.". No other details mentioned.
He has nothing mentioned about the PRICE, either at the front cover or back cover.
the retailer got it for RS 474/unit (frm the manufactuer),since he bought 40 units.
my doubt is, at WHAT PRICE the retailer ( who bought it DIRECTLY from the manufacturer, in bulk)has THE RIGHT TO SELL ( as per the law)?
[i.e. LEGALLY, at what price, he can sell it to the ULTIMATE CUSTOMER?
Whether at RS 597.50 OR at ANY PRICE to a MAXIMUM of RS 1195(i.e. at RS 597.5 or at RS 896.25 OR at RS 1195 OR at 'in between RS 474 - RS 1196') AS PER HIS CHOICE ( and NOT as per the choice of manufacturer)?]
if ,whether the manufacturer could have the right to INSIST him to sell at 597.5 or at any other rates, which the manufacturer may wish that the retailer should have to sell it to the 'ultimate customer'?.
if the RETAILER sell to a customer ( who buys a single copy or unit) at RS 896.25 OR at a price which range between RS 474 - RS 1196(i.e. upto rs 1195), is that a CRIMINAL OFFENCE or CRIME?
IS the retailer is legally punishable FOR THAT?
if, other retailers sells as per manufacturer's advice at rs 597.5 or any other prices(as manufacturer prefers),what will be the legal consequence or impact on our above mention retailer( who sold per unit at RS 896.25)?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Crpc 169
If accused released under CRPC 169, its possible to rearrest the accused by proving about involvement of the accuse in the crime?