Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 22:54
Respected Sir's
I am charged under 420 & 468 related to a passport offense, i was offered a job out of India & in regard to the same, i was asked to get a passport done by the agent & the agent messed up the whole thing by forging my documents,
in this regard, i have taken anticipatory bail from high court, now, when i recollect the agent has submitted a degree certificate (FAKE) & it has not yet reached the police officers, now my query is, if police gets the same during their investigation, are they going to file a fresh case & arrest or the present anticipatory bail holds good.
i am in deep trouble &as i am tensed every minute as i have a family with two minor kids.
i am scared of their future as i am the only earning member in the family & if some thing happens to me, all of them would suffer because of my mistake.
Thank you all in advance for answering this question.
Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 22:39
Dear sir,
1--if any appeal is pending in the Session court regarding excess interim maintenance given to wife on wrong statements.
2--can her counsel can appeal/ submit any application in trial court regarding residential order or any other kind.when matter is pending in trial court.
3-- can respondent submit any application in trial court when some matter is pending in session court.
thank you in advance
Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 10:40
i have file a criminal case in munsif court but the judge returned file stating how the petition is maintainable when a civil case is pending i have not filed supreme citation that criminal case is maintainable what are other supremecourt judgements latest
Anonymous
01 October 2011 at 23:54
Cyber Crime Police filed a case against my cousin under IPC 66A, and sealed her laptop.
Is it mandatory to seal devices like laptop under this act. Kindly update.
Should we apply in high court under section 482 against it?
Thanks
Anonymous
01 October 2011 at 20:46
In a judgment famously delivered of Rachna Kathuria vs Ramesh Kathuria, Delhi High Court, Justice Dhingra mentioned in his judgement "Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 does not create any additional right to claim maintenance on the part of the aggrieved person. It only puts the enforcement of existing right of maintenance available to an aggrieved person on fast track" and similar lines on the above idea. Question is The Act itself mentions per section 26 and section 36 of PWDVA Section 26. Relief in other suits and legal proceedings.-(1) Any relief available under sections 18, 19,
20, 21 and 22 may also be sought in any legal proceeding, before a civil court, family court or
a criminal court, affecting the aggrieved person and the respondent whether such proceeding
was initiated before or after the commencement of this Act.
(2) Any relief referred to in sub-section (1) may be sought for in addition to and along with any
other relief that the aggrieved person may seek in such suit or legal proceeding before a civil or
criminal court.
(3) In case any relief has been obtained by the aggrieved person in any proceedings other than
a proceeding under this Act, she shall be bound to inform the Magistrate of the grant of such
relief.
Section 36. Act not in derogation of any other law.
36. Act not in derogation of any other law.-The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to,
and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law, for the time being in force
Now which is the correct legal lawful stand, The Act itself or the Judgement.
Does any1 know if there is any appeal preferred against it or what were the contentions of argument in the lower Court.
Anonymous
01 October 2011 at 20:25
I want the list of Advocates who are experts in Criminal case. Who can give relief to the client by his experience.
Anonymous
01 October 2011 at 18:28
If the witness not doesnot appear on the date specified. Will the court gives another date, if not does it weakens the position of the complainant
Victor
01 October 2011 at 18:17
Has any one have the 498a squashed in AP HC or SC. Kindly provide.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Forgery - ipc 420 & 468
i am charged under sec 420 & 468 for an offense, i had applied for a passport in 2009 & had submitted a forged date of birth.
police has started their investigations just now.
Passport is not issued & this has not cuased any finacial loss to any one nor i have taken any benefit out of it.
I had no wrong intention as this was done to secure an overseas job.
Can i plea bargain in this case or should i contest?
Most of the documents are against me like the passport application, the verification form,the documents submitted along with the passport application has my signatures.
now, if i plea bargain, will my case be considered for probation offenders act & can i get released under probation offneders act as this is the only offense againt me.
Thanks in advance to the experts