Anonymous
30 October 2011 at 12:27
Will you pls kind enough to intimate under what Section Punjab Wakf Board can apply police help to construct wall.So that unauthoised occupant may not interfere
Anonymous
30 October 2011 at 11:34
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I belong to a lower middle class family. My father has taken V.R.S in the year 2004(Mar).
In the year 2009(Sept-Nov), my father went to his native place to spend some time there. During this period My father's childhood friend contacted him.
He said to my father that he has good experience in stock market, but he has no money to do the business. He asked my father to invest some money with him.
Relying upon his words my father deposited
Rs 100000 with him.He gave 2 options of repayment:
(i) Monthly RS 8,333 for a period of 12 months and Rs 1,00,000 at the end of 12th month.
(ii) Total lumpsum payment of 2,00,000 at the end of 12th month and no monthly repayment.
Depending on the condition of our house my father opted for option(i) i.e monthly payment.
As per the agreement he initially paid Rs 8,333 for a period of 3 months correctly.
At the begining of the 4th month my father has invested a fresh amount of Rs 2,00,000 with him. As soon as he got this 2,00,000 Rs he completely stopped repayment as per the terms of the agreement.
Please advice me, what to do in this case..
SSng Aulakh
30 October 2011 at 11:00
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied
The Fundamental rights & right of living of me and my family is highhandedly denied to make us suffer.
Anonymous
30 October 2011 at 10:15
Dear sir
one person wrongly implicted me and wife in a fight of two persons in which we were not involved. we went into a compromise and got an sworn affidavit from him that he was injured by some un identified people and me and my wife and the third accused had no fight with the complainent and nor do we caused any injuries. WE surrendered before the court and got bail. NOw the IO says that the case can also be converted to 307, what should be do about it kindly explain us the legal possibilites and how to go about it ?
Jolly James 9447287658
30 October 2011 at 06:38
what are the probable defenses in a minor (aged 14 ) rape cases by an auto driver, who is acquainted with parents. They usually hired his auto.Please help me urgent
dev kapoor
29 October 2011 at 23:06
Dear Friends/Experts,
I am fixed at a legal-puzzle. A CJM recorded formal statements of the pws examined by the complainant & also the complainant,on a fresh complaint being presented before him.Instead of issuing summons etc, he found the case exclusively trial by Sessions Judge & committed the case for trial.
Q: Is is not an ILLEGALITY/IRREGULARITY?
In any case What is required of the SJ to set the things right e.g.Shall he return the complaint to CJM for adopting proper procedure & commit again? OR
Shall he make a reference to the High Court for illegality committed by CJM in not adhering to the procedure?
OR
Should he proceed with the complaint,issue notice to PP,summons etc to accused & wait till they appear in his court,supply copies of complaint etc to them & proceed with trial?
Purely academic & not Professional !!!!
Y. T. R. Rao, Advocate, VIZAG
29 October 2011 at 22:55
SIR! ALLEGED OFFENCES ARE S.395, S.419 & S.420. N 90TH DAY CHARGE FILED. THIRD BAIL APPLICATION FILED AFTER LAPSE OF 100 DAYS. BUT PETITION WAS DISMISSED. NEED GROUNDS FOR FURTHER STEPS. PLEASE ADVISE...
Anonymous
29 October 2011 at 21:40
if complaint is filed by victim or not decide its cognizabilty.
Prasad
29 October 2011 at 13:21
and my aged mom aged 79 was charged under IPC 498(a) on 3 rd June 2010 .We were granted bail on condition that i have to report mentioned police station for two months .i reoprted to police station for 2 weeks and in mean while i got visa and went abroad Trail on criminal court is on ,my aged mom attened court and due to her age she was granted some time permision for attendence in court
on June 2011 divorce on xpartie was filed by girl party and on September 2011 divorce was granted
The case on Judicial criminal court for IPC 498 is on 28october 30th Girl agreed to in court for squashing case and my lawyer was insisting for crpc 313
As ia m abroad will my case on this IPC 498 will also squash as i am unable to come now as i have to sell my property for a job and now it is only 1 year i got a scurity job here in Dubai
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Help to counter: "code of criminal procedure 1973 v/s section 202(2) provision
Dear Sir/Ma’am,
On February 23, 1991, around 1 a.m., some Police Men misused their authority and tried to kill my father and his friend so as to get reward. They shot my father and his friend in their legs and tried to frame them as naxalite with deliberately showing fake documents. My father always carried his licenced 12 bore gun (of my grandfather) with him (which he used to keep as folded in his handbag). They said that my father fired at police and in retaliation, these injuries are caused.
But truth prevailed and we won that case. But the complaint case (for Section 307 charges) which we filed against those police men is still in the Magistrate Court for last 20 years and charges are not still to be framed against those policeman. But it’s struck due to some complications in the case. I don't know much about the Laws but they say that it’s because of below clause:
"CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 V/S SECTION 202(2) PROVISION, if the complaint trilable by court sessions"
Note: Please find all the things in details in attached sheet.