Mr. Hitendra Shah
03 November 2011 at 08:10
Respected Sir,
the details are in the file attached.
Thanks,
Hiten Shah
hitendrahshah30@gmail.com
what should I do to get result?
Awaroop Asthana
03 November 2011 at 00:42
Sir
CMD (non IAS)of a semi Govt. organisation is chargesheeted by police under section 420/467/468/471/524/506 IPC.Can he be suspended by the parent organisation/board of directors?
Swaroop asthana
Kanpur(UP)
Parthasarathi Loganathan
02 November 2011 at 19:51
Please visit the link provided below and fill up a Survey form shared by a gentleman who has put up more than three decades in Banking operations.
http://prpoint.com/poll/public/survey.php?name=bankfraud
His details are furnished below:
V Rajendran
Advocate and Cyber Law Consultant
Senior Vice President, Cyber Society of India
044-22473849; 9444073849
The survey may take just a few minutes. Kindly do participate in the survey and submit your views. I am sure, you must be having some kind of complaint or grievances on their internet banking account or an ATM transaction. The survey is purely for academic purpose and any information will be used only for the purpose of analysis and for no other monetary gains.
You may tell the participants that as a practicing advocate and consultant on cyber crimes I on my part will be glad to provide legal counsel and any clarification on matters pertaining to cyber laws, cyber crime in banks, compliance procedures etc.
Please circulate this mail to your contacts and get me responses from a few people who may have had some kind of problem or a complaint with or without loss of money, or a complaint or a grievance either solved or yet to be solved. Please also visit his website www.venkrajen.in when you find time and quote my name for reference.
I am sure that you would share all your valuable feedback to this Survey by one of the senior most professionals in the industry.
Regards and best wishes
Parthasarathi Loganathan
Anonymous
02 November 2011 at 18:42
Sir,
Can any one tell me what is the Limitation period for filing 497?
Sathya Narayana
02 November 2011 at 13:21
WHETHER LIMITATION ACT PASSED BY THE HIGHEST LAW MAKING AUTHORITY VIZ: PARLIAMENT CAN BE OVERLOOKED / SUPERSEEDED BY COURTS OF LAW BY ALLOWING SLPs and under such circumstances what is the validity of limitation act ? whether state governments which are subordinate governments to govt.of india can themselves becomes parties to such slpS ?
Anonymous
02 November 2011 at 10:51
Hi
I got married 1 year back. My wife had a illicit relation with one of her college mates. Things went wrong and from beggning of marriage. my wife and her parents filed a 498a and DP3/4 case againt me.
Bases on the proofs given by me police and declered the case false in court and submitted a final report in court (Court has to still accept the report). Final report clearly says that she has an illicit relation based on her call records (call records show hrs for talking every day). As my wife had clamed that I had taken 5 lacks form her father through check(I have never taken any check). Police found that the check no given by my wife is never used.
This case has nearly ruind my life. Now I want to teach them a lesson. I have following questuions.
1) What are ther various cases whcich I can file againt my wife, her parents and her boyfreind. Cheating, defamation, criminal intimidation, blackmail, adultry etc
2) After marriage we were living in Chennai. But my wife filed the cases in our home town in patna. Her boy freing lives in Delhi. Is ther any change that I can file some cases against them in Chennai. Like defamation or criminal intimidation, etc.
3)In the various petitions given in court and police my wife and her parent have used bad words for my mom. Also they have told bad things against my mom to many of our relations. What action she can take against them.
Hetalkumar
02 November 2011 at 10:50
Please let me know, if the person have filed private complaint u/s. 190 (1) of Cr.P.C. on particular offence and upon which magistrate had took cognizance and issue process u/s. 202 of Cr.P.C. to enquired into the case to the IO, Can IO on similar set of circumstances and upon instance of another person, subsequently lodge FIR u/s. 154 of Cr.P.C. and take charge of entire investigation for which 202 order is already made by the competent magistrate under whose jurisdiction had been made out ? Can IO have right to club the enquiry and insvestigation basis on subsequent FIR lodged against him ? If the IO, basis on FIR of some other person, tried to manage things and harrass the original complainant and it's witnesses by giving threat of arrest and police attrocities, with intention to fit the person as well his witness before Magistrate in Private Complaint and wrongly diversified entire prosecution, what remedies are available with the complainant who lodged Private Complaint before Magistrate for appropriate investigation in his enquiry case ? Can High Court made interfearance u/s. 482 of Cr.P.C. to give entire enquiry and investigation on second FIR to independant Investigating Team ? or to give suitable direction as to quashing of Second FIR for same offence, registered with Police with an intention to harrass complainant, who rushed first to Magistrate by way of private complaint ? Please advise with any Apex court's Authority in this regard.
Anonymous
02 November 2011 at 07:05
Hello..
I am having matrimonial dispute with my wife. Is is an advocate, enrolled in the month of JULY, 2011.
I have her details.
She has given wrong information to the BAR COUNCIL before or at the time of registration about her marriage status that she is not married and she is single.
She has concealed that she is married.
Plz. suggest, whether any complaint can be filed regarding this to the BAR COUNCIL. What action(s) can be taken...??
Thankx
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
02 November 2011 at 00:51
sirs,
i am very much in need of some citations (preferably of supreme court) on the follwing topics . please help me sirs !
1) only police testimony, the sole independant witness to the seizure has turned hostile
2) no legal evidence that seized articles were explosives as they were not sent for any chemical analysis
3)inordinate delay in sending samples to magistrate court
4)arrest and seizure on the basis of a prior information.but no search warrant from a magistrate/ a search memorandum was prepared send to the magistrate before going for search
5)Pw1 arresting officer(SI) says he has seen the accused on the right side of a house. But, Pw2 police constable says that he has seen the accused on the left side of the house
6)
pw1 SI says they were 6 persons , in total , in the raiding party
but, pw2 constable says that they were only 5 persons in the raiding party
7)same set of witnesses for SCENE MAHASSER and SEIZURE MAHASSER , which were prepared by two differenr police officers on two different days . as per scene mahasser there are a lot of people residing near bye
8) charge sheet submitted in the magistrate court after a long delay
thanking you sirs ,
SALIL KUMAR.P
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
MOB : 9447536929
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ipc 4989a
i along with my 2 sisters were charged with 498 on 10th January 2010 and case was on in trail court till 10th october 2011 and it is settled and we applied for quashing FIR and trail court has send file to CJM for valuable report .
Due to my job i have to leave India for US on 17th feb 2010 .The case on me is transferred from trail court to CJM in my place.As i am employed in bakery in US with a small salary i find it difficult to come to india since it is only 1 year i left for US.
Will honourable CJM can squash my case as quashing and settled