LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi   10 November 2011 at 13:03

Sec 138 n i act

my client is accuse..

the council of complainant had issued statutory notice within due time. but the mentioned amount of cheque is 3,50,000/- instead of the true amount 2,50,000/-.

the last para of the notice also show the wrong amount can we take benefit of the same?

they have filed case in time.

one more ting is that the account was closed in 2009 and the complainant had wrongly misplaced the cheque and deposited in the bank in janu 2011 and the cheque is returned with the endorsement of "account closed in janu 2009".

please advise me...

Anonymous   10 November 2011 at 12:54

Judicial remad

What is Judicial Remand? what purpose behind it?

Anonymous   10 November 2011 at 11:59

Citation needed

I have read a supreme court judgement in304b ipc case that the accused nominated his wife(deceased)"in his insurance policy decessed as a nominee "so there is no crueality and the accused released"

i have missed the crl. A no. anyone know the citation no ple sent it to me
e-mail. mammalcare@gmail.com

Anonymous   10 November 2011 at 11:45

Manipulation of record

Dear Sir/Madam,
A private hospital has done some manipulation in medical records of the patient who has died in that hospital and has given photocopy of it to the family member after making a written request.
Does this manipulation of medical record attract criminal sections?
What the victim should do? Plz suggest.
Thanking all of You.

Anonymous   10 November 2011 at 09:05

Jurisdiction of lower court to discuss and argue applicability of hc order

Hello,

This is a very strange situation, please advice:

1. H.C. passed stay orders in a case proceedings. The stay order is applicable to all accused in the case as it was granted against the petition filed by all the accused.

2. The complainant's counsel presented written application in the lower court stating that the stay order is not applicable to some of the accused.

3. The Lower Court Judge, initially asking the complainant's counsel to submit his contention in HC, accepted the application and asked the accused's counsel to submit reply to explain their reason on why the HC Stay Order is applicable to all accused.

Question:

A. Is the lower court right in it's decision to accept the application from complainant's counsel to discuss the authority of the HC Order?

B. Does the lower court has Jurisdiction to discuss the applicability of HC Order? If no, please also site the appropriate sections of CrPC that can be brought to the notice of lower court Judge.

Thank you.

Arvind Singh Chauhan   10 November 2011 at 08:44

Bigamy

If after the full consideration of evidence criminal court finds that husband has remarried and wife has sufficient ground to live separately, and husband is liable to maintain her under 125 Cr.P.C.

If court elaborate this finding of second marriage in judgment of 125.

How far copy of this judgment relevant to punish the husband for bigamy, if wife does not want to produce more evidence ???

Anonymous   10 November 2011 at 05:52

Section 311 crpc

can defence recall any witness again for cross examination when earlier cousel had opportunity to cross examin him but did not cross examine fully and new cousel who is appointed in place of him as a result of earlier counsel death desire to do so.

Anonymous   10 November 2011 at 05:23

Case diary

how case diary of another case may help accused in another case which is on trial.explain me can we use SUCH DIARY of another case.

Anonymous   09 November 2011 at 21:45

Manhandling in between two govt. officers of same department & sec 353 ipc

R/Experts
I want to know if two officers of same department posted at different stations (at a distance of about 20 kms ) quarral/manhandling with each other in the office at office hours time, one of them can lodge a complaint against another uss 353/186/332/506 IPc or not.......kindly suggest.Regards
Rakesh

vinayak   09 November 2011 at 19:05

Section 138

Cheque bounce date 1-9-2011

Can i file a complaint under sec 138 and if not what would be procedure to recover amount ? pls advice