Anonymous
25 December 2011 at 13:16
one of my friends issued cheques worth 80 lakhs to his ex partner on disolution of partnership in an undertaking and on disolution. It is proved on records that:
1. the complainent has negative capital in his balance sheet.
2. that the complainent says he has no acounts for rs. 40 lakh he gave as financial assistance. he tore of the papers.
3. the complainent has not filed any suit for recovery of such amount.
please advise what is the status of the case now ?
Anonymous
25 December 2011 at 13:07
Respected sir,
a person was forcibly entered into house by giving threat that if you cant come with us i will tear blouse of my wife and implicate you in false case and taken signature on papers and throw out of the home, and complainant is homless, in august 2011 a private complaint was lodged u.s 384, 452, 406 and magistrate direct u.s 202 for investigation, but the police replied complainant not found from 4 months, the accused managed the police station till the report is pending by police please guide me can i file complaint u.s 145 cr.p.c now guide me
Anonymous
25 December 2011 at 13:05
Respected sir,
a person was forcibly entered into house by giving threat that if you cant come with us i will tear blouse of my wife and implicate you in false case and taken signature on papers and throw out of the home, and complainant is homless, in august 2011 a private complaint was lodged u.s 384, 452, 406 and magistrate direct u.s 202 for investigation, but the police replied complainant not found from 4 months, the accused managed the police station till the report is pending by police please guide me
Anonymous
24 December 2011 at 21:01
a man was charged with 302, 120 ipc and 3sc/st act,as he could not be arrested police put up challan under 299crpc, the court took cognigance and commited the case to sessens court, later on accused surredered in the court and sent to j.c now police wants p.c. for further investigation, what is the legal position. can police seek p.c. in this case
Anonymous
24 December 2011 at 21:01
Could anybody le me know the full form of P.R.C.No. in Criminal procedings? As such I know c.c is for criminal case no. ?
navin
24 December 2011 at 18:03
Respected Shroff sir,
Court-- J.M.F.C thane,
Magistrate Mrs.patil
Case no- 0282/2010
next date- 03-Jan-2012.
I will surely contact to Respected Bansal Sir.
Anonymous
24 December 2011 at 17:59
this is not a query. rather some info on recent judgement of sc in case titled nitinbhai saevatilal shah v/s manubhai manjibhai decided on 1/9/2011. this judgement is being blanketly applied by trial courts thorughout the india to order de novo trials in 138 matters even when same is not required. the judgement reinforces s.326(3)CrPC which talks of non reliance of evidence in summary trials by subsequent magistrates when previous one is transferred. this judgement is only applicable to cases where substance of evidence has been recorded as per summary procedure( refer to para 13 of judgement.
THE JUDGEMENT DOESNT APPLY TO CASES where even though summary trial is held but full fledged verbatim statements evidence of witnesses is recorded. refer to shivaji sampat jagtap v/s rajan hiralal arora 2007 CrLJ 122..........i am providing this info because the aforesaid sc judgement is being applied blanketly applied even where it is not applicable to the detriment of complainants in 138 cases whose cases are on maturity by ordering denovo trial which will not only result in failure of justice and also double pendency of 138 cases.
Anonymous
24 December 2011 at 17:46
hI
2)My wife filed a false dowry case,DV case & Interim maintance now again she filed a section 125 crpc case by one or the other she is harrasing me like anything.What is this section 125 crpc already she had asked for maintance then what is this.
2)My wife filed a false dowry case against me i want to file a case under dowry prohibition act section 3.What this section says & whether it is help ful for me.
sajed
24 December 2011 at 17:42
One of my client is accused in stolen Railway property case. other accused filled Discharge petition before Magistrate.instead of deciding petition on oral argument he asked complaint (police inspector ) to lead evidence. prosecution leaded evidence. Now as per Magistarte oral version he will allow us to cross examine once . if we cross examine PW1 now he will not going to permit to cross in main case . if are not going to cross examine in DISCHARGE PETITION he will allow us to cross examine in main case . Can we cross examine both times ? Any supreme court & High courts judgment are there that accused counsel can cross examine in such situation TWICE ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Dv case and interim maintanance
Hi
My wife filed dowry case,DV,Interim maintance & section 125 case.assued if the court ordered for x amount can i go for stay in higher courts.