Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 02:26
a govt employee convicted in n. i. act case, conviction warrant is pending against him and manage police, accused took leave on false groung, should i serve the certified copy of judgement to higher officials in his office, does it attracts any action against him as he is convicted by a court.
ganesh kumar
07 January 2012 at 20:43
I have filed a revision against the order of the MM, who dismissmed my compalint in default. I have filed the revision before Session Court who suggest me to withdraw the same and filed before high court because of Dhingra's judgement. Ld. Court told me that the Sessions court does not have the power. Kindly provide the details of judgement if any body have or put some light over the issue in question. The reason for the dismissed in default is non appearance only once. This is only due to problem while noting the date into diary
Anonymous
07 January 2012 at 18:28
My wife has filed a false case under section 498A and 406.
She is having one younger brother and one younger sister and my inlaws belongs to poor family.
Now I am planning to file case u/s 406,420 etc. on them on following facts :
1.I have given cash of Rs.20000 each to my SIL and BIL as they request me to advance that amount to them as loan for payment of thier tution fees and they tole me that they will repay the same within one year but till now I have asked them several times but they are not paying me the same.
2.I have advanced Rs.15000 to my FIL and MIL as loan on being requested by them as they required the same for repayment of rent of their rented house.
Is this good idea to counter my in-laws. What are the advantages or dis-advantages of the same.
Thanks.
Anonymous
07 January 2012 at 15:14
We have purchase a flat from M/s Laxmi Global Import Export Pvt. Ltd., Mansarovar, New Mumbai. We have booked flat from Builder in Dec-10. at that time they show us a plan in which no any shopr / residential in ground floor. It is completely open for parking & playing & our booking price is fixed on that basis that we will get more FSI for use. Afterwards they have change plan with CIDO & shown a Shops in ground floor. Whwn we ask the builder for the same he says that we have use our FSI. although as per CIDCO approved revised plan ares for shop is 210 sq. feet each whereas builder construed for 280 sq. feet each. That is excess illigal construction due to which only 4 parking ares are left for 20 flats & 4 shops. Even no Watchmen's cabil & society office is built by Builder yet which he has to provide normally. There is no sufficient space for that. Also the construction quality is poor. With in residence of only 15 days we observe removing of wall slabe, craks, partly removal of MAin door frame, low quality Electrical wiring & fitting is low quality, even building finshing work not yet completed. We call builders office but they are not neglecting us. What remidies we have to complaint against builder. Pl suggest.
Anonymous
07 January 2012 at 13:45
My friend was on Bail in Case u/s 498A and 406.
On last hearing date, the date given to him by reader was 3-01-2012 but the other party by bribing the reader, change the date afterwards to 3-12-2011.
On 3-01-2011, when he present in the court, he has been informed that his bail was cancelled as no body was present on 3-12-2011 from my freinds side and then the lawyer has said him to take the bail again.
My question what action he can take to ensure that in future it doesnt happen again and what action we can take against reader or the other party.
Thanks.
ritesh
07 January 2012 at 11:53
First of all i would like all expert for their valluable suggestion.
sir,
as for my safety i have recorded conversation between me & my friend in which he is saying that you will get you amount invested when i will receive the same from the department.
sir, but i asked his to give post dated check for the same amount he is not ready for the same.
sir,should i belive him for the same or not,or should i file F.I.R FOR THE SAME
Arvind Singh Chauhan
07 January 2012 at 08:23
Whether accused's presence is mandatory in appeal before session court. Generally exemption is asked in session court for presence of accused. If Yes why not in High court or supreme court also.
If Not please refer the provision or law.
Jolly James 9447287658
06 January 2012 at 22:35
Dear experts
In a trial of rape case I did not challenge the age of victim. Her age as per statement was 14 but as per the school certificate it was 15. So I did not ask any question or challenge about her age. The school certificate was challenged while examining the head master. The court take a stand that I failed to challenge the age of the victim so I cannot challenge the school certificate or her age. Is it correct. My view is that prosecution should stand their on foot. The defect of the defense will not strengthen the case. what you say can you suggest any ruling.
anil kumar agarwal
06 January 2012 at 22:05
RAM bought 10 hectare land from govt alonwith his father in law and brother 40 yrs back. share of ram was 25 percent , brother shyam 25 percent and father in law krishna 50 percent. ram was cultivating whole land since purchase, 20 years back his father in law and brother passes away,ram continue to cultivate, 3 yrs back ram filed a suite that no one named krishna exits and his brother has also died so land should be recorded in the name of himself 3/4 share and 1/4 in the name of shyams heir.in this suite he made shyams heir the party. this suite was filed by ram s son who happens to be a lawyer,later on shyams heir submitted affirmative affedavite in the court through the same lawyer [ram,s sons] on this basis revenue court issued a decree declaring ram owner of 3/4 share and 1/4 to shyam ,s heirs. now krishna legal heirs filed a fir against ram , his lawyer son and shyam ,s heirs. what is the legal position .who is guilty and under what sections
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cheque bounce
Dear Sir/Madam,
I was made a payment by a buyer in cheque. Unfortunately the cheque got bounced and could not be cleared for insufficient payment.
The cheque was issued dated 20th May 2011. I have sent numerous reminders to the buyer and although some payment has been made but the entire amount is still not made. The buyer is as of lately not responding to my calls.
My question is can I approach the police and court with a case of cheque bouncing. Is there any time bound limit to present a bounce cheque complaint.
Do please advise me.
Regards