vinodkumar
05 February 2012 at 15:34
A leaving in city and settled in city with his family, in his native village A has his, father;s home, after his father died, a never go in his village, after some years, when a went to in village,his home, he came to know that, a unknow person intentionsuly brek the lock and door and take possesson the home and also valuable thing, A ask the unknown person about it but the unknown person not vacate the home, under this fact which section of ipc is applcable for said offence?
vinodkumar
04 February 2012 at 23:15
In above criminal mater, police arrest one person like A, A apply for bail application u/s crpc 436 which is mandatory provison for bail in baillable offence. the magistrate call investigation officer and ask some question and then after investigeting officer put new report for add ipc 324 in FIR. IN really face the injured person is get medicle treatment as out door patient as first day, he has a simple injury on his head, on his head 4 stiches,injury. and then after 24 hour due to bed intension injured person second time without any reason, admit in private hospital for disturbing in our bail applicaion. A' s lawyer request all this fact in court but court, not order in bail application and FIX FOR HEARING bail application for next day, and demand for medicle certy, in this situtaion A sufferi g for pre trial conviction without any proper reason, so A can do some leagle step against the magistrate or police?
LegalEagle
04 February 2012 at 22:31
the facts are- if a famous personality goes to a tv show having lie detector wires attached to his seat- for example a serial like "sach ka saamna"....and if he is asked a ques about his wife's murder which happened a year ago he participated in that show.....he gave his answer in a negative showing his innocene, but the lie detector machine denied his answer and held him to be lying...in such a case..will the admission be admissible in courts AGAINST HIM?and will it have evidentiary value?
LegalEagle
04 February 2012 at 22:29
the facts are- if a famous personality goes to a tv show having lie detector wires attached to his seat- for example a serial like "sach ka saamna"....and if he is asked a ques about his wife's murder which happened a year before he participated in that show.....he gave his answer in a negative showing his innocene, but the lie detector machine denied his answer and held him to be lying...in such a case..will the admission be admissible in courts?and will it have evidentiary value?
varinder
04 February 2012 at 22:23
i here by requested to send me the drafting to file a criminal co0mplaint under 156/3 before the magistrate.
ALKESh BODIWALA
04 February 2012 at 22:18
INDIAN PERSON IS AT PRESENT RESIDING IN CANADA.
What is the legal procedure to issue a warrant against this person.
What is the Court procedure to issue a warrant against this person.
In that any provision in Cr.P.C.
I am advocate but I don’t know this proper procedure.pl.explain me proper and legal procedure to Issue a warrant from Gujatat to Caneda.
deadlaws
04 February 2012 at 19:33
An order was passed by the link M.M. in a fresh complaint and he fixed the matter for pre summoning evidence.
Now just before the date complainant filed list of witnesses alongwith application to summon the witnesses listed.
now the regular M.M. says that she would like to re appreciate the complaint, whether to take or not to take pre summoning evidence.
Is it permissible, after cognizance and fixing the matter for pre summoning evidence.
Can we make a complaint against M.M. for collusion with accused under 120 IPC ?
LegalEagle
04 February 2012 at 19:06
Can interviews/statements in TV shows be admissible in Courts? do the same have evidentiary value?
SANJAY JOSHI
04 February 2012 at 18:36
Dear Sir/s
With due respect to all experts, I am posting this query again because it is not academic but a case of CBI. I am only not putting the details of Case no. here, but it is purely a case related subject and academic. I would humbly request you to enlighten me on this topic please. I am following all the suggestions to ask a Query.
Query - A witness' statement has been recorded u/s 164 CRPC by the Magistrate. However, in section 164 (5), there is a clause that Magistrate has powers to administer oath to the witness. But it is not written that the witness shall be given oath by the magistrate. In this case,
Question- Does this mean that the Magistrate has to mandatorily administer oath to the accused before recording his statement u/s 164?
Question - Is the magistrate required to mention at the foot of the statement (like while recording confession u/s 164) to mention that oath had been administered to the witness before recording the statement. and also that is it mandatory for magistrate to write that the statement given by the witness appeared to be given VOLUNTARILY? Thank you so much. Regards.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 138 : case lost
Hello
If you remember i asked a question about section 138 on this forum.I fought this case for an year and lost it.I have been charged to pay 1 lac with simple imprisonment.i was left on a bail bond on the order day.Does this mean i will be put behind bars even if i pay the money(which i never wanted to pay those cheater).What happens if i appeal.I am unable to find a lawyer with an honest answer.Am a girl with high values.Coming to court itself has become so distressing for me. Am being treated as a criminal for no reason.I spoke to a local lawyer he says he would fight this in the session court and would charge me 50k.Is he making use of my situation.I am all stuck do not know what to do.I gave them a security check with the trust that they would fulfil all they promised. But a training of 6months was reduced to 2and half months.I was trained by their employee with the same profile as mine.Why should i pay the amount.I donot know what went wrong on the trial.PLease help.Please help
Thanks