vijay
07 February 2012 at 17:04
One broker forged a false agreement that i had done an agreement to sell my property to him in 51 lac. and he had paid me 40 lac on the day of agrement.the agrement is notarized as well.
In the register of notary there is only one signatures of the three owners of the property and that too is tainted/cut ,the police seazed the register
our signatures on the agrement are true.
i dont know how and when i signed the document .
when he sent me a leagal notice , i was surprised and i filed FIR against him.
and now the chargsheet of the case is also filed before the court.
Now the accused had filed a complaint in the court against police and me that the
police had made cuts in the register of notary.
my question is that when the chargseet is filed in the court then is it possible for the accused to seperately file a complaint and register a new case when the same offence is already in court
let me clear you the detail of the acused.
The accused was my servant(salesman) at my shop for more than 15 years ,and we treat him like a family member . but from last few year 's he started his own work as a property broker . and i purchased that property through him (accused). he is one of the witness in my registry .
At the time of mutation of the property he took signatures on a blank Rs.100 stamp paper, saying that a affidavit is required for namantaran . Since we trust him a lot we dind't cared as it was a RS 100 stamp .
He missused this stamp and forged the false agrement.
Please also guide me how can he prove that he can pay 40 lac in cash at a time . one more important thing is that he is not an income tax payee
hi
I am facing a 498a case and my father in law has said they had paid me 4 lac cash, two day after marriage, that too after creating drama on marriage pandal.
Can i requrest below information.
Tax return of FIL. He is retired govt offical
Bank statement of FIL. re
I had read about RTI, but not sure about it.
P.C. Joshi
07 February 2012 at 01:24
Dear learned friends,
I want to know in case of dishonour of a cheque, whether a complainant has to appear persoanlly before the Magistrate for making the complaint or at any stage of the trial or he can deligate it to someone else by a power of attorney.
Will the answer be different where the complainant is an individual or firm or a body corporate.
Thanks
P.c. Joshi
P.C. Joshi
07 February 2012 at 01:18
Dear learned friends,
I want to know in case of dishonour of a cheque, whether a complainant has to appear persoanlly before the Magistrate for making the complaint or at any stage of the trial or he can deligate it to someone else by a power of attorney.
Will the answer be different where the complainant is an individual or firm or a body corporate.
Thanks
P.c. Joshi
amit
06 February 2012 at 21:47
A warrant was issued against X, sometime in the year 1993 to 1996 (Date not sure). X was charged against Transport Corruption matter in collusion with the RTO dept. & the case was put in hands of an IPS officer Y, (whose tenure was also in between the above year, not sure). Concerned thana is also not sure, only the details of the accused person are there.
Now if I move RTI letter to collect information what addressee should I mention apart from the PIO, & to which dept. Shall I move an application of RTI to DM or Police Commissioner of the city regarding the current position of the case?
Can a PIL be filed against the above accused X and his other partners who are still grabbing the govt. money/revenue in collusion with the RTO dept. personnel? Can a FIR which was filed against the X be reopened, if the matter had been closed under what provision?
can miscellaneous applications be disposed during "proceeding stay by High Court"? kindly provide the case law.
Sir/Mam
Do any one know any case laws in plea bargaining?.
if in case of s 138 of NI act if notice not served within 15 days to payee because of any reason what action can be taken or what is the provision for action against payee.plz give me suggestion on that because my client forget to give notice to payee and now he came back after 18 days of receiving receipt from bank for insufficient fund.
chethan
06 February 2012 at 14:51
Hi,
Can any one tell me the udpated details of section 198 which is related to filin gof 498(a). I heard that section 198 is changed as of oct 2010 and it says that a 498(a0 case can be filed on behalf of wives only if she is dead ? I am not a lawyer , so can any on ehlp me out with the correct answer.
Thanks
Chethan
Criminal law
M.M. says that he wont call upon witnesses prior to statement of complainant under sec. 200.
Can we move an application under section 202 to issue summons to witnesses before diposing under section 200 ?