CreateGoodwill
25 February 2012 at 11:31
I want to file a criminal suits against a dealer for 90K at Ghaziabad can anyone give details of advocate for the same
baiju
25 February 2012 at 09:04
Dear sir,
i had taken a personal loan from dubai nbd bank in 2007 and i had payed the instalments without any dues till 2009, at this time i was terminated from my job due to recession and my company got liquidated. and the court in dubai had put a liquidator for pay the employess the end of service but till now we havent got the end of service. as i had got terminated from my job i did not get any other jobs in dubai, so i came to india. now the collection agents in india is calling me to pay back my debts, as i havent got my end of service till now iam not able to pay my loans back, now they are telling that i will be facing a criminal case for this, i just wat to know is there any case they can take a criminal case against me, plz help me as am not able to pay back my debts until i get my end of service, plz reply.
Niny
24 February 2012 at 19:30
Conviction under s.302, Can it be changed to sec 304 during Appeal , as act was done under grave and sudden provocation, claimed by council for accused, u/s. 300 exceptions (b)culpable homicide not amount to murder.
Arvind Kumar Sinha
24 February 2012 at 19:07
1. Under which authority the mariners on the Italian Ship Enrica Lexie Napoli(in the news for killing of two Indian fishermen at 14 nauts from the base line of Kerala port) are being prosecuted ? Section 3 or 4 of IPC does'nt seem to cover the act of killing by a foreigner at 14 nauts which is beyond territorial waters (12 nauts) of India?
2. Under which authority have we arrested and are prosecuting the 120+ Somalian pirates kept in custody at Taloja ,Mumbai,India?
Tashi Norbu Basi
24 February 2012 at 15:15
Greeting to all,
I had lodged a FIR and the police during investigation arrested the accused. Accused was granted bail by Court. Having completed their investigation the police filed chargesheet. The accused was summoned and he appeared and received his copy of FIR. On the next date, the accused was absent. The Defense Counsel said accused or his wife was unwell so acc was unable to appear. On next date also the acc was absent. His Counsel told Court that he had neither information nor instructions from acc. Warrants were issued against acc and surety. Next date, same story. This happened for several dates. Neither acc nor his surety appeared in Court nor were they to be found.
Now accused has filed a petition u/s 482 CrPC in High Court for quashing of FIR, saying no criminal case is made out in FIR. I am the complainant but have not been made a party to this petition for quashing.
I understand the general arguments governing quashing of FIR.
What I want to know is will the fact that (1) acc has been absconding and both he and his surety have been evading the warrant issued by Court and (2) I have not been made a party to the petition for quashing, effect the decision of the High Court and if so, how? Citations please, if possible.
Thank you.
Amit R Kumar
24 February 2012 at 14:20
hi sir, one of my relative is getting frequent calls from her old boyfrind and he is making lewd comments on the calls, the numbers he is using is a fake number and this number belongs to united kingdom, i dont know how he got this fake number and using it...we complained about it to the police and told them, Along with the making obscene calls charge, he should be charged for using such fake number which could be used for making any illegal activity in india..police is doing nothing..kindly suggest what should be done?
N.Saravanan
24 February 2012 at 13:50
45 of Evidence Act has been dismissed on the ground that belated, rising the point at cross examination but denied the notice not 313Cr.p.c
again i filed 2nd petition stating that want to examine the age of ink but also given sc judgment but magistrate reply to me
how can file 45 of evidence act petition two times and i replied prayer is different
dev kapoor
24 February 2012 at 11:41
Hello Sir,
I seek your expert advice on the following:
(A)A case has been committed to Sessions by Chief Judicial Magistre for offence u/s.376 IPC in which the other juduicial Msgistrate had granted interim bail to accused.CJM did not cancel the interim bail.Now,is the accused the accused required to (a) approch the JIFC for confirmation of baor o (B) he should file an application for grant of permanent bail of the accused ? Kindly help me to know relevant law/provison and/or judgments,if any.
Regard !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Murder of husband by wife
Mrs. A and Mr. R was a couple married in 2003. After 2 years of marriage there were frequent quarrels between the two because of no child born out of the wedlock. It resulted in the consistent alcoholism of R and the quarrels use to end with brutal beating of A. The parents of A well as R tried to resolve the matter but as the couple was living away from their parents in Mumbai, the resolutions failed. In December 2004 A lodged a police complaint against R but police only admonished him and took no cognizance of it. Because of the complaint R increased his aggression and started locking her in the house and did not let her communicate to anyone. A started getting depressed by the scenario thinking that her life would never change and her miseries would never end. She was going through the same treatment from her husband till 22nd June, 2011 when she committed murder of R using kitchen knife.
The trial court sentenced her with life imprisonment and the High Court upheld the same without granting leave to appeal.
A now wants to challenge the decision in Supreme Court. Kindly advise.